Jump to content

Romanos Ivory: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m Notes: citations
Line 2: Line 2:
'''The Romanos Ivory'''
'''The Romanos Ivory'''


The Romanos Ivory is a carved ivory relief panel from the Byzantine empire measuring 24.6 cm (at the highest) by 15.5 cm and 1.2 cm thick. The panel is currently in the Cabinet des Médailles of Paris. It is known as the Romanos Ivory for its depiction of the emperor Romanos and his wife Eudokia being blessed by Christ. However, there were two imperial couples by these names instigating an ongoing controversy among scholars. It was first believed to represent Romanos IV and therefore dated between 1068 and 1071. Discoveries of other carved relief works in the 20th century led researchers to theorize that it represents the earlier Romanos II, changing the date of creation to somewhere between 945 and 949. [2].
The Romanos Ivory is a carved ivory relief panel from the Byzantine empire measuring 24.6 cm (at the highest) by 15.5 cm and 1.2 cm thick. [1] The panel is currently in the Cabinet des Médailles of Paris. It is known as the Romanos Ivory for its depiction of the emperor Romanos and his wife Eudokia being blessed by Christ. However, there were two imperial couples by these names instigating an ongoing controversy among scholars. It was first believed to represent Romanos IV and therefore dated between 1068 and 1071. Discoveries of other carved relief works in the 20th century led researchers to theorize that it represents the earlier Romanos II, changing the date of creation to somewhere between 945 and 949. [2]


'''Romanos IV and Eudokia Makrembolitissa'''
'''Romanos IV and Eudokia Makrembolitissa'''
Line 20: Line 20:
==Notes==
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
# ^Parani, Maria G. "The Romanos Ivory and the New Tokali Kilise: Imperial Costume as a Tool for Dating Byzantine Art"(2001). Cahiers archéologiques. Fin de l'antiquité et moyen-âge vol. 49 (2001) p. 15-28
2. ^Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, Ioli. "Eudokia Makrembolitissa and the Romanos Ivory." Dumbarton Oaks Papers 31: 305-25.


3. ^Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, 310
1.^ Parani, Maria G. "The Romanos Ivory and the New Tokali Kilise: Imperial Costume as a Tool for Dating Byzantine Art"(2001). Cahiers archéologiques. Fin de l'antiquité et moyen-âge vol. 49 (2001) p. 15-28


4. ^Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, 318
2.^ Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, Ioli. "Eudokia Makrembolitissa and the Romanos Ivory." Dumbarton Oaks Papers 31: 305-25. Jstor.org. Web.


5. ^Cutler, Anthony. “The Date and Significance of the Romanos Ivory,” in Byzantine East, Latin West: Art Historical Studies in Honor of Kurt Weitzmann, ed. Doula Mouriki et al. (Princeton: Department of Art and Archaeology, Princeton Universit5, 1995), 605–10."
3.^ Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, 310


6. ^Pariani 21
4.^ Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, 318


7. ^Cutler, Anthony. "A Byzantine Triptych in Medieval Germany and Its Modern Recovery." <i>Gesta</i> 37.1 (1998): 3-12.
5.^ Cutler, Anthony. “The Date and Significance of the Romanos Ivory,” in Byzantine East, Latin West: Art Historical Studies in Honor of Kurt Weitzmann, ed. Doula Mouriki et al. (Princeton: Department of Art and Archaeology, Princeton Universit5, 1995), 605–10."


8. ^Cormack, Robin. Byzantine Art. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000.
6.^ Pariani 21


9. ^Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, 322-23
7.^ Cutler, Anthony. "A Byzantine Triptych in Medieval Germany and Its Modern Recovery." <i>Gesta</i> 37.1 (1998): 3-12.

8.^ Cormack, Robin. Byzantine Art. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000.

9.^ Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, 322-23





Revision as of 18:51, 1 March 2016

This sandbox is in the article namespace. Either move this page into your userspace, or remove the {{User sandbox}} template. The Romanos Ivory

The Romanos Ivory is a carved ivory relief panel from the Byzantine empire measuring 24.6 cm (at the highest) by 15.5 cm and 1.2 cm thick. [1] The panel is currently in the Cabinet des Médailles of Paris. It is known as the Romanos Ivory for its depiction of the emperor Romanos and his wife Eudokia being blessed by Christ. However, there were two imperial couples by these names instigating an ongoing controversy among scholars. It was first believed to represent Romanos IV and therefore dated between 1068 and 1071. Discoveries of other carved relief works in the 20th century led researchers to theorize that it represents the earlier Romanos II, changing the date of creation to somewhere between 945 and 949. [2]

Romanos IV and Eudokia Makrembolitissa

Until 1926, this panel was assumed to be depicting the coronation and/or marriage of Romanos IV and Eudokia Makrembolitissa, mainly due to the inscription over Eudokia’s head which reads “Basilis Romaion”. Basilis (and Basillisa) was a title only used by women who were regents for their minor sons, which Eudokia Makrembolitissa was at the time of her marriage to Romanos IV. The term was only used by two other women, both of whom assumed the throne as sole rulers or regents for their sons during their lifetime. Bertha-Eudokia did not have title or powers greater than the senior empress Helena, who would have been referred to as ‘augusta’ and “no instance is known in which the wife of the crown prince was called august or basilis.” [3] There are currently no known instances where a wife of a crown prince was portrayed, nor a junior emperor without the senior. [4] The image of this double coronation was also used on seals and the coinage of the realm to both promote Eudokia’s power and legitimize Romanos IV as emperor.

Iconographic concerns

Contemporary scholarship on this piece asserts that this work represents the 945 CE Easter coronation of junior emperor Romanos II and his child bride, Bertha (re-named Eudokia on her arrival at court). Stating that “emperors are always show more or less as they looked”, scholars point to the fact that the Romanos depicted on the Ivory is beardless, and therefore more likely to be Romanos II, who was only six years old by the time of his coronation in 945 CE. In contrast, the later Romanos IV would have been about 30 and had a full beard. There is also some allusion to the Eudokia figure’s ‘child-like features’ [5]. Costuming of the couple also favors the Romanos II theory, as Romanos is shown wearing a loros while Eudokia wears a chlamys, signifying she is subordinate in rank to the senior empress, Helena. [6] It is therefore assumed that this is the only surviving imperial portrait where Christ is crowning a junior emperor and empress.

Stylistic Concerns

Some scholarship links the style of the Romanos Ivory to other surviving works of art that are more certainly dated in the 10th century. An ivory plaque ordered as part of an epistolary by Sigebert, bishop of Minden (1022-1036) is part of such a group, and Cutler states “if… the central portion of the triptych that had arrived in the west before the death of Sigebert of Minden in 1036, it follows that the Romanos ivory could not have been made in the second half of the 11th century.” [7]. This claim also fits with other assertions that metal and steatite [link] were favored over ivory as a medium by in the 11th century [8].

However, others note that the ivory more stylistically resembles other works dated in the second half of the 11th century such as the Harbaville plaque and at least to other Byzantine era triptychs, while noting the 10th century mode of carving was more flat and use less undercutting than seen on the Romanos Ivory. Facial types and other artistic details have also been paralleled to works created at this time. maybe clarify what "this time" means [9]

Notes

  1. ^Parani, Maria G. "The Romanos Ivory and the New Tokali Kilise: Imperial Costume as a Tool for Dating Byzantine Art"(2001). Cahiers archéologiques. Fin de l'antiquité et moyen-âge vol. 49 (2001) p. 15-28

2. ^Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, Ioli. "Eudokia Makrembolitissa and the Romanos Ivory." Dumbarton Oaks Papers 31: 305-25.

3. ^Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, 310

4. ^Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, 318

5. ^Cutler, Anthony. “The Date and Significance of the Romanos Ivory,” in Byzantine East, Latin West: Art Historical Studies in Honor of Kurt Weitzmann, ed. Doula Mouriki et al. (Princeton: Department of Art and Archaeology, Princeton Universit5, 1995), 605–10."

6. ^Pariani 21

7. ^Cutler, Anthony. "A Byzantine Triptych in Medieval Germany and Its Modern Recovery." Gesta 37.1 (1998): 3-12.

8. ^Cormack, Robin. Byzantine Art. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000.

9. ^Kalavrezou-Maxeiner, 322-23




To add an inline citation to an article, follow these steps: Check that the bottom of the page has a "Notes" or "References" section. If not, type: ==Notes==

Check that the Notes section either has the text

or . If not, type:

. This determines where your references will appear on the page.

Now click after the text you would like to create a reference for. Now type in [1] after your reference. Wiki software will automatically add your inline reference number. You can also use the Cite gadget, described on the next page, to insert the <ref> tags and citation details.

You can leave an indented reply to someone else's message by beginning a line with one or more colons. Be sure to sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~) to mark it with your username and a timestamp.

Leave an indented reply like this.--~~~~

Subsection

  1. ^ tag before your reference and type