User talk:FA9295: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Can you please stop reporting vandals ''I'' revert to AIV? It's '''really annoying''' typing it up, only to be edit conflicted because you edited AIV two - four times in the last minute, and see that you wasted my time as well. [[User:Boomer Vial|Boomer Vial]]<sup>[[User talk:Boomer Vial|Holla]]</sup> 18:46, 5 March 2016 (UTC) |
Can you please stop reporting vandals ''I'' revert to AIV? It's '''really annoying''' typing it up, only to be edit conflicted because you edited AIV two - four times in the last minute, and see that you wasted my time as well. [[User:Boomer Vial|Boomer Vial]]<sup>[[User talk:Boomer Vial|Holla]]</sup> 18:46, 5 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Boomer Vial}} I'm not sure why you're annoyed by this. I reported them because they had a sufficient amount of warnings to be reported at the time. When someone adds another report under the initial one, all it does is put the second report under the first one as a comment. [[User: |
:{{ping|Boomer Vial}} I'm not sure why you're annoyed by this. I reported them because they had a sufficient amount of warnings to be reported at the time. When someone adds another report under the initial one, all it does is put the second report under the first one as a comment. [[User:FA9295|<font color="(#000080)" size="2px">'''''FA9295'''''</font>]] [[User talk:FA9295|(talk)<font color="(#000080)" size="1px"></font>]] [[Special:Contributions/FA9295|(contributions)<font color="(#000080)" size="1px"></font>]] 18:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
::{{tps}} Well, not actually. What Boomer is saying is that they've begun typing their AIV report and by the time they try to save it, you've changed the underlying page (so an edit conflict occurs). (Taking no position in the dispute, just my interpretation of the complaint.) <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">[[User:General Ization|<font color="#006633">General <i>Ization</i></font>]]</span> <sup>''[[User talk:General Ization|<font color="#000666">Talk </font>]] ''</sup> 18:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC) |
::{{tps}} Well, not actually. What Boomer is saying is that they've begun typing their AIV report and by the time they try to save it, you've changed the underlying page (so an edit conflict occurs). (Taking no position in the dispute, just my interpretation of the complaint.) <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">[[User:General Ization|<font color="#006633">General <i>Ization</i></font>]]</span> <sup>''[[User talk:General Ization|<font color="#000666">Talk </font>]] ''</sup> 18:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
:::Exactly, and not only is the edit conflict annoying when we report different vandals, but it's more so when I end up wasting my time typing it, only to see it's already there. [[User:Boomer Vial|Boomer Vial]]<sup>[[User talk:Boomer Vial|Holla]]</sup> 19:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC) |
:::Exactly, and not only is the edit conflict annoying when we report different vandals, but it's more so when I end up wasting my time typing it, only to see it's already there. [[User:Boomer Vial|Boomer Vial]]<sup>[[User talk:Boomer Vial|Holla]]</sup> 19:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:25, 7 March 2016
Archives |
No archives yet.
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
If you have any questions or concerns/criticism regarding my edits, then you are at the right place! With that said, please be civil when leaving a message on my talkpage. I will then respond to you from here in a timely manner. Also note that this talkpage has an archive rate of 2 months (1460 hours). If you need to continue a discussion that is currently archived, you will need to start a new thread that continues the discussion. Thanks! FA9295 (talk) (contributions)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Garagepunk66. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jan van der Molen, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
NPP
Please do not tag new pages for deletion. You do not have nearly enough experience to be undertaking any maintenance tasks on this project yet. If you would like to learn how you can be of help to Wikipedia, please consider patrolling for vandalism, but you will need to learn hoe to do that too, so check out the Counter Vandalism Academy and see what you need to do to graduate. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:35, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
I have declined your speedy delete nomination on Shokhrukhbek Abdulazizov as there was a claim of importance, championship wins, world record, "popular". Also you nominated too soon only 20 minutes after writing. Give the inexperienced page creators a break! Let them have an hour before giving them a dispiriting edit conflict and a red notice on their page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:38, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Please stop
Can you please stop reporting vandals I revert to AIV? It's really annoying typing it up, only to be edit conflicted because you edited AIV two - four times in the last minute, and see that you wasted my time as well. Boomer VialHolla 18:46, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Boomer Vial: I'm not sure why you're annoyed by this. I reported them because they had a sufficient amount of warnings to be reported at the time. When someone adds another report under the initial one, all it does is put the second report under the first one as a comment. FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 18:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Well, not actually. What Boomer is saying is that they've begun typing their AIV report and by the time they try to save it, you've changed the underlying page (so an edit conflict occurs). (Taking no position in the dispute, just my interpretation of the complaint.) General Ization Talk 18:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Exactly, and not only is the edit conflict annoying when we report different vandals, but it's more so when I end up wasting my time typing it, only to see it's already there. Boomer VialHolla 19:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Well, not actually. What Boomer is saying is that they've begun typing their AIV report and by the time they try to save it, you've changed the underlying page (so an edit conflict occurs). (Taking no position in the dispute, just my interpretation of the complaint.) General Ization Talk 18:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Singapore pinacotheque de paris
An article that you have been involved in editing—Singapore pinacotheque de paris —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. ► Bgpaulus (WORDS & DEEDS) ◄ 19:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Your signature
Just an FYI: your signature sends people to User:(FA9295) instead of User:FA9295 when clicking on the user portion of it. I'm not sure if you're aware of this, if you meant to do this, or not. Just figured I'd leave you a courtesy message and let you know (just in case) ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Oshwah: Yup, that was a typo in the coding of my signature, and it's now fixed. Thanks! FA9295 (talk) (contributions) 22:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- No problem! I got your back! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:49, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
~~ok i will take care while making changes to content~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mywikipediaarticle (talk • contribs) 18:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)