Category talk:Systems programming languages: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Category name: new section |
m Signing comment by Mister Mormon - "→Category name: new section" |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Category name == |
== Category name == |
||
Would the singular form be preferred? [[Systems programming]] and [[systems programming language]] both redirect in such a way. |
Would the singular form be preferred? [[Systems programming]] and [[systems programming language]] both redirect in such a way. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mister Mormon|Mister Mormon]] ([[User talk:Mister Mormon|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mister Mormon|contribs]]) 22:57, 8 March 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 22:58, 8 March 2016
I am not sure if SMALL belongs here. A lot of "low level" stuff was done in small.
Nevillednz 00:48, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
According to the Wikipedia page on Swift, Apple refers to it as "the first industrial-quality systems programming language that is as expressive and enjoyable as a scripting language". Is this disputed in any way or is not listing it here an oversight? - 13/07/2015
Category name
Would the singular form be preferred? Systems programming and systems programming language both redirect in such a way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mister Mormon (talk • contribs) 22:57, 8 March 2016 (UTC)