User talk:Narutolovehinata5

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Please leave a new message below this line. Remember to add a section heading. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

• Also, if you are asking why I tagged your page for deletion, just leave a new message below the "Talk Page" thing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Please add new sections below this line. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Regarding Cirque KA changes

Hello. Sorry about the changes I made referring to the 2013 accident on Ka. The reason being is that it's already mentioned in the Ka page and on the Fatalities sections, so I felt it was being repeated too many times (do check again). And I didn't mention it in the changes because I really don't know how since I'm a independent contributor that doesn't wish to register with Wiki (I like my freedom and anonymity). Again, my deepest apologies and no disrespect intended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.136.54.8 (talk) 20:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Happy Birthday

Hey, Narutolovehinata5. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Pratyya (Hello!) 14:32, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Bolding Lead Roles

Sorry if my edit to Maaya Uchida went against the manual of style, I'm not really a regular editor. Her list of roles already had three other bolded ones though, shouldn't they be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shardwing (talk • contribs) 17:17, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

My Edit was removed

Hey, I'm sorry about the article posted earlier on m behalf, Delonexenergy. I'm new to wikipedia, and was trying to create a dummy page to test things out.

My Edit was removed

Hey, I wanted to know why my edit was removed

Stop adding external links. Please see your talk page. Optakeover^(Talk) 16:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata interlanguage links

Hi! I think you should be very careful when removing interlanguage links. I think bots (or a bot) populated Wikidata back in December, so there are many links not present there. You should check if every link is present in Wikidata and leave the ones that aren't. --Moscow Connection (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Read this, by the way: Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Removing Wikidata interwiki links and their reversal. Try the script recommended by Rschen7754 there. I haven't because I don't edit Wikidata yet. But I'm worried cause you may want to delete interlanguage links from all Japan-related articles. :) --Moscow Connection (talk) 19:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. But don't worry, I checked most of my removals, and the interwiki links did show up (although in at least one case it didn't, so I have to revert it). Maybe I'll try the script too. And no, I only want to remove interwiki links from articles I want to edit ;) Happy editing! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Okay. I don't know how to use the script, by the way. --Moscow Connection (talk) 04:26, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry to say this, but I thought I would show you an example of how your edits had damaged Wikipedia and I found these in a matter of minutes. :) Not in Wikidata: uz:Manga, kk:Elfen Lied, be-x-old:Elfen Lied. Incorrectly linked in Wikidata: eo:Mijazaki Hajao. I simply wanted to find some examples, so I looked at the most popular pages. --Moscow Connection (talk) 04:48, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

You can always revert the edits, or better yet, add the missing links to Wikidata ;) I don't mind being trouted at this point. It will teach me to be a little more careful with my edits. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

I've corrected these 4 links just to show you how clever I am. But I didn't check other links. To be honest, I simply noticed (looked at creation dates) that Wikidata was populated by bots in November–December, so I just browsed through your contribution history, opened the most popular articles and checked if there were any interlanguage links changed or added to them lately. (By the way, I have your talk page in my watchlist at the moment, I always do it when I start a conversation with someone.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 05:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

And, by the way, in case you have difficulties with Wikidata (as I did)... First of all, I noticed that Wikidata wasn't listed in my SUL info. So I logged to Wikidata with the same password I have here, after which I found "wikidatawiki" automatically added to my SUL. (I didn't register, I simply entered the same login and password, and I found out that I was already there.) Then, I mostly use Internet Explorer, and I couldn't see any "edit", "add", etc. links in Wikidata when I was using it. I saw interwikis, but I didn't see any way to edit or add anything. Chrome and Firefox will work. --Moscow Connection (talk) 05:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Need help and counseling.

I do not believe that the article I edited contains any original material. I have cited source material from reliable sources.

What text is considered original material that I shouid remove or provide further citations?

RichardCacioppo (talk) 23:21, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Image song

How come you never notified me that you sent the page to AFD after declining my PROD? The article is in a shit state. The only references in the article regard the charting information for some songs from K-On. It's a dictionary definition at best. Come on now.—Ryulong (琉竜) 03:10, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Sorry Ryulong, sorry that I forgot to notify you. Probably because I thought that the page was on your watchlist and that you would see my edit. I should have at least informed you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

It's sorta upsetting that the AFD closed as keep just because "we know it exists". The sources do not support the notability of the subject. They support the notability of K-On's music. And oddly enough the article was on my watchlist. I just somehow missed the AFD entirely.—Ryulong (琉竜) 03:58, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Well, if you don't agree with the outcome of the discussion, you can always take it to WP:DELREV, or wait a few months, then re-nominate it for deletion. Honestly, I have no opinion on the article, I only sent it to AfD because the PROD was likely to be challenged because of the sources even though your rationale had some merit. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

My PROD explicitly stated that the sources were bad. I don't see why you felt the need to send it to AFd.—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Trouting myself again

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

I should be more careful with the rollback button. Oops :/ Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Aoi Yuki

I translated this text from Japanese wiki to wiki in Portuguese, and I wanted to bring it back here. What do you think of it?

She entered the entertainment industry at the age of 4. As a child, participated in films and dramas. From 1999 until 2002, she made regular appearances on variety shows Appare Sanma Dai-sensei and Yappari Sanma Dai-sensei, from Fuji TV. When she was in the fifth grade of primary school, she made his first work as a seiyū, which placed her in every branch of dubbing. Until the end of 2006, she was affiliated with the theater company Central. After her admission to the college in August 2007, starts to belong officially to the Breath's team, changing his artistic name to Aoi Yūki. She got her first major role in 2008 in Kure-nai , as Murasaki Kuhōin. In August of the same year, moves to the Pro-Fit. After that, there is an increase in their work as voice actress and a decrease in their work as an actress. In 2009, starred in two animes: Anyamaru Tantei Kiruminzuu and Yumeiro Pâtissière as Riko Mikogami and Ichigo Amano, respectively. After that, she becomes the protagonist in many of his works, taking as an example Iris, from Pokemon: Best Wishes!. In the year 2011, she interprets the protagonist in Shōjo Madoka Magika Mahō, Madoka Kaname. In October of the same year, won the award for best voice actor in "Newtype x Machi Asobi Anime Awards 2011", and , on March 2, 2012, in the announcement of 6th Seiyu Awards, became the winner newest history of the award, winning at 19 years of age.

Thank you very much. Ermeson15 (talk) 21:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

It could use some copyediting and sources, but other than that, it should be good to add. The article's currently a stub, so any further info is always appreciated. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:19, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Ermeson15's talk page.
Message added 11:30, 4 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ermeson15 (talk) 15:20, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

ALTIMA

Thank you for contacting me Narutolovehinata5,

The reason why I made a change to the names is because motsu usually goes by that name, real name is never used. But it's OK because I talked to Motsu and he's cool with what's on the wiki page. My interview with him (which comes out today) was added on the external link.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.10.96.16 (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Trout

You trouted me for deleting Christian Pasilan at 13:37 when I had already restored it at 13:36, less than two minutes after making the mistake. Perhaps you should trout yourself, or better still get on with something useful instead of cluttering talk pages with stupid rubbish. SpinningSpark 13:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

When I trouted you, the page hadn't been restored yet. It was restored while I was saving my edit. Guess I was a little slow. Sorry about that. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:11, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Battle of Dimishq

Yes, it did happen - and it's a copyvio of The Cambridge History of Iran Vol 6 to boot. And posted by a suspected sockpuppet of User:Polllilur as well... Peridon (talk) 18:23, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Talk:List of Steins;Gate episodes

Hey could you have a look at this discussion and provide a Point of View. I would like to spark some debate on this matter regarding use of Japanese Given names and Family Names. Thanks. Also, I'm still planning material for that Accel World article so I would end up with a large edit sometime soon. If they're any other articles with Terminology sections please let me know. Peace. KirtZJ 18:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback from Allen4names

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Allen4names's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello

Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars Wikipedaia:Don't template the regulars Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars Wikipedaia:Don't template the regulars Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars Wikipedaia:Don't template the regulars Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars Wikipedaia:Don't template the regularsDrumstickJuggler (talk) 01:11, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipediaing

"The act of using Wikipedia." GB fan 10:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

ArUco

Hi,

I just wanted to let you know that I removed the proposed deletion message from the page 'ArUco' for the reason 'Does not appear to be particularly notable software.' as this software has been referenced on multiple other wikipedia pages (see ARToolKit and List_of_augmented_reality_software), I hope this is okay.

Sietl (talk) 12:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. if you want me to help out on the article, I'd be happy to. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Self-trouting

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Next time, check directly on Commons instead of searching for it. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 17:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

about ore no kanojo to Osananjumu ga shuraba sugiru

It is a really small mistake and not that big of a deal but i am currently watching the anime and you put that his parents left him in high school but they left him on his own when he was in his third year in middle school. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.204.204.58 (talk) 19:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Free!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BS11 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Free!

Hey, just wanted to notify you that I nominated Free! at WP:DYK.--十八 00:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Two things

I'm cleaning up Attack on Titan and I'm noticing two things, the first is a continuing trend, and the second is a mistake you made. First, songs whose titles are in Japanese should not have their titles be literally translated into English. I am noticing this a lot on anime and manga articles, even though the Japanese manual of style does not proscribe this action. I think something needs to be stated somewhere to the effect that "Unless a song is primarily known by its translated title (ex. "A Cruel Angel's Thesis"), do not translate song titles" And secondly, I noticed that you mentioned that the broadcast is happening on April 7. While it is true that it airs at ~2 am on Sunday mornings, it is still considered part of the Saturday night broadcast so you should follow what the broadcaster says. This is how it works for TV shows no matter the originating nation, as I am almost 99% sure that List of The Venture Bros. episodes follows this concept, as it airs on Sunday nights, but technically on Monday.—Ryulong (琉竜) 16:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

However, we should still apply WP:MOS. I think an RFC would be a good option to decide whether or not the official broadcast date or the actual broadcast date should be used. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh, you responded. MOS:DATE does not govern when a broadcast day ends. It simply says that if you are going to write "12:10 am" in a 24-hour system, it should be parsed as "00:10" instead of "24:10". There is nothing in the manual of style that states that if a show is said to have premiered on "Saturday April 6, 2013, at 25:58" (a date all reliable sources point to), that the English Wikipedia should report this as "Sunday April 7, 2013, at 01:58/1:58 am".—Ryulong (琉竜) 18:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

But it's still implied. And besides, such a practice would confuse readers who are unaware of how Japan's broadcast schedule works (even I was confused at first). If you don't mind, I'm going to start an RfC on this very matter so that proper consensus will be reached. Thank you for the heads up. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 18:48, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

It's not implied at all. And this doesn't confuse readers who watch crap on Adult Swim. They have stuff that premieres after midnight but they still say it's part of the Saturday or Sunday programming block rather than the Sunday or Monday block.—Ryulong (琉竜) 19:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Free!

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Notifications box replacement prototypes released

Hey Narutolovehinata5; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Sea Quest

Ok, thanks for that Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Anete meuzniece brice

Hello Narutolovehinata5. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Anete meuzniece brice, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: a redirect seems reasonable, in this case. Thank you. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 16:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

I was actually going to tag it since we appeared to already have an article on her, but it appears it was redirected while Twinkle was tagging it. It happens sometimes. Sorry. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Delonexenergy (talk · contribs)

Just wanted a clarification on the message you left on the above user's page. Am I missing something? Hoax? -SFK2 (talk) 10:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

The user created an article, but later blanked it, which was why it was tagged as G7. I warned him just in case. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, but I doubt that it was a hoax given that it's probably COI-spam. -SFK2 (talk) 10:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Now that I think about it, G11 was probably a better speedy criteria. Thanks for the heads-up. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

No worries. -SFK2 (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

RDG Red Data Girl

I can't agree that 608 words are necessary to summarize a 24 minute episode, and even episode 4's 355 are too many. If you disagree, would you please state your reasoning on the talk page? I agree that the template I placed is inaccurate though. ー HigherFive〈Ｔ | Ｃ〉 16:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

What I meant to say was, the summary should be concise: not too long, not too short. Also, the length of the summaries is actually more or less the average length of summaries in the episode lists I've seen. Perhaps a better idea would be simply to spin it off into its own article. Also, the template you added is partially incorrect, as some of the episodes had episode summaries that were so brief they didn't even properly explain the essentials of the episode. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:31, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Mythbusters

Hi

Agree with your feeling that adding a separate section on Mythbusters quotes is not worthwile. Will look for another, less structure modifying way to mention it. Probably more as a single sentence, along with some other popular culture facts.

Have a nice day,

David (Rademakd) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rademakd (talk • contribs) 12:26, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Narutolovehinata5, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Vatsan34 (talk) 17:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

SKE48, BLP tag

The BLP tag links to [Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]], and the policy covers all of Wikipedia--not necessarily articles that can be called biographies in the strict sense of the word. BTW, I don't dispute the removal of the tag. The sourcing is poor, but not as poor as the content of the article itself, which consists of nothing but membership trivia. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Manyū Hiken-chō

The anime IS yuri. I have watched the episodes, and in all of them, women suck the breasts of other women and drink the breast milk and all that. And they kiss a few times and grab each other's boobs. And they moan. They moan. Is that a good enough source for you? 24.184.185.132 (talk) 02:55, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Well, one good idea is to find a reliable source that actually confirms it to be a yuri anime. Which anime are considered "yuri" is sometimes subject to debate and isn't always obvious. Citing a reliable source is a good way to confirm it. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:04, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

I kind of understand now. Thanks 24.184.185.132 (talk) 03:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

CD-i games from The Legend of Zelda series

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Yann98's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Deadman Wonderland edits

This is concerning the recent edits I made at this page. It was not a plot section (if that were the case, I would be fine with the edits), it was a character profile, which is supposed tell more about a character. An early reader may read just to know more about a character, and have the entire ending spoiled. This is better suited for "Plot" section, like you said, not "Main characters" section, especially considering how awkwardly placed these edits are. guidelines on spoilers appears to say nothing to contradict this. If I have made any mistakes or have overlooked something regarding this issue, feel free to correct me; I have not exactly been here for a long time, and I would appreciate the advice. --Toonipedia (talk) 00:48, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zenryoku Gu Shōjo!! Action!!

The article Zenryoku Gu Shōjo!! Action!! has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 192.251.134.5 (talk) 13:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Adminship?

Hi Narutolovehinata5! I see from your userboxes that you would like to be an admin but are too shy to nominate yourself, and that you are "nowhere near being an admin". Well, actually, you might be a lot closer than you think. :) Would you like me to nominate you? From what I've seen so far I think you would pass an RfA without too many problems. Let me know if you're interested, and I'll write you up a nomination statement. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 18:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Actually, I had been thinking of adminship for a very long time, but right now, I don't think I would make a good admin. Yes I may be familiar with a lot of Wikipedia policies, but I don't know if I currently have a the capabilities for the job. Also, I'm a little busy with studying for university so I don't now if I will have the time. For now, I need to decline this, but I'm still open to the idea in the future. Thank you anyway. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:28, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I'm curious - what do you mean when you say "the capabilities for the job"? I can't think of anything in particular that would stop you from being a good admin. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 06:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Madoka

Madoka is OFFICIALLY 12 not 14 185.33.113.252 (talk) 09:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Do you have a source for that? In Japan (the original) she's 14, so unless Aniplex of America changed her age ala Pokémon, the article should say so. Even if so, both ages could be mentioned, or a note should be added to explain the change. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes I have sources ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.33.113.252 (talk) 17:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Post them here. if they're reliable according to the standards set at WP:V and WP:RS, then feel free to make the change. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 17:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Article Improvements

Hello! I'm new to the Wikipedia scene, and you reviewed my first article, Developing Lives (thanks for taking the time to do so, by the way). I'd like to improve it, so I thought I would ask you for suggested edits that I could make to ensure that the article is up to par. I've already tried changing some of the wording to make it sound less like the promotional sources I referenced. Thank you! TardyMarmot (talk) 20:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Declined speedy of DRNH architects

I just wanted to let you know that I declined your speedy deletion tag of DRNH architects because I did not think it was blatantly promotional. If you still think it meets our deletion policy, then I would suggest WP:PROD or WP:AFD. Singularity42 (talk) 23:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Singularity42. I was actually thinking somewhat the same while tagging it (honestly A7 probably better applies) but because the article was (apparently) written by one of the company's architects (based on the creator's username), and because of the wording of the first sentence, I ended up tagging it as G11. Sorry about that. I don't think the article satisfies our GNG though Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank You!

I've been dealing with these IP hoppers for almost a year and a half on Steven Blum's page, it's driving me crazy that no one even watches the citation put there at all. I owe you one, thanks a ton! --Vaati the Wind Demon (talk) 13:29, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. It pains me to say this, but given the article's previous history, the article could use pending for a few months. Couldn't someone just edit his IMDb profile though and correct his DOB? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 18:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

I tried, eight times with my IMDB account, but it still hasn't changed, I even provided them the source, but my edit did not get published by the website since then yet. --Vaati the Wind Demon (talk) 19:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

hi, i am the one who made the last edition of the Aoi Eir page

i think it is inappropriate to mention Aoi's gravure and her gravure name there.

since its appears that Aoi already quit her gravure job have her new better life as music artist now.

she also change her name from Yui Arisawa into Aoi Eir, and in the beginning of her career as Aoi Eir, she actually always cover her face so shes not recognized.

so i believe in respect for Aoi, as fans who respect and support her we should leave the fact that she was gravure model alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord murakami (talk • contribs) 15:55, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

As long as the info is sourced it should remain in the article, and since the info is sourced, it satisfies WP:BLP. If you believe the info should be removed, please post on the talk page. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Joe Mohney Page

Hello, I am the appointed editor for the page you have recently placed under speedy deletion titled "Joe Mohney". He is a client of the Developmental Firm I work through and they had requested a page be created to show his professionalism and credibility, and this page is used due to the fact that he is in talks with major labels discussing record deals at this moment. Please do not be so quick to turn down this page, it is a positively written biographical piece of literature which can only be expanded and enhanced throughout the upcoming months and years as his career progresses quickly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joemohney (talk • contribs) 15:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rie Kugimiya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chiaki Takahashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you but I am writing about the article KickRaux which you said should be deleted. I understand you may have not heard of him but there is a lot of producers and artist and other things on Wikipedia I have never heard of. If you could please give me some advice on what can help it stay and also 24 hours to fix the problems. I have things which I can add and may be able to add whatever your looking for to not delete it. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walker1977 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the message! Anyway, for a person to have a Wikipedia article, he or she needs to pass WP:GNG; meaning, he or she needs to have been covered by significant reliable coverage (simply put, he or she needs to be the subject of an independent, non-blog (Blogspot or Wordpress), non-fansite or non-forum article (such as news articles or professional blogs). And Wikipedia is not the place for publicizing things (or in this case, people) who haven't been heard of yet. Sure Wikipedia is full of obscure topics, but those articles have been covered independently, or have a claim to notability (see WP:NOTABILITY for a fuller explanation). Unfortunately, KickRaux has not been covered in reliable sources, at least not yet. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Reviewing Openowledge article

Hello! I've received a notification that you've reviewed an article that I've recently wrote, Openowledge. I was wondering whether the article passed the review and whether if the 'unreviewed' tag could be removed. Thanks you! Kkj11210 (talk) 11:50, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

It means that the article has been checked by a new-page patroller (a Wikipedian who checks every newly-created article and sees if they pass Wikipedia's guidelines), and yes, the "unreviewed" tag can be removed. Sorry for the late reply, been fairly busy with stuff lately. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:36, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! I'll remove the tags then. Kkj11210 (talk) 11:12, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Tenth anniversary of the Tagalog Wikipedia

I trust that since you've been interested in the Tagalog Wikipedia's future development, you will be coming this Sunday? :) --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 05:51, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm afraid I can't, since I need to go back to my home province for the weekend (I am from Batangas but I am currently studying at the University of the Philippines Manila and living with relatives in Quezon City), but thanks for the invite. Maybe if I have time I can go to a future Philippine Wikimedia event. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I should note that it's on a Sunday evening, so technically by then you should be on your way back to Manila in time for classes, no? (That is, unless UPM doesn't have classes as well on Mondays, like UPD.) --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 12:59,

27 November 2013 (UTC)

I go to school Monday early morning for my PE classes so I'm (usually) not in MM on weekends. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:46, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

re: protection

Yeah I mean I have no objection to doing something like that. I will look at it again sometime in january and see how things are going then. Thingg^⊕⊗ 01:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at HigherFive's talk page.
Message added 14:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 14:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

About GACKT

Hello ! Thank you for your message about my last edit. I indeed wanted to change what some users may have "revealed" as unnecessary private details, possibly harmful for GACKT. The truth is, I am a huge fan of him, and as he is starting an international career, I thought various rumors and fantasies about him should not have been displayed on Wikipedia... I wanted to enlighten his talent instead.

I am sorry, I actually explained the reason for my edit in the edit summary... maybe I did it wrong, and it got deleted ? Do you think you can have my edit back, or do I have to write it again ?

Thank you for having taken time to read my edit and told me your view.

Kind Regards,

Noctalys — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noctalys (talk • contribs) 19:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Attack on Titan

I am the reviewer who accepted the removal of the word "tragic" from the article Attack on Titan. I did think the anonymous user referred to a spoiler in a plot, but then decided they meant that the conclusion of "The Mist" was unnecessarily being described as "tragic". Thinking it might be a violation of WP:NPOV, I accepted the change. What do you think? Smtchahal (talk) 11:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm fine with reverting the change, but just remind the user that removing spoilers for being spoilers is a big no-no per WP:SPOILER. If he/she didn't mention the word "spoiler" at his/her edit summary I wouldn't have reverted the edit. Sorry, I'm just a bit trigger-happy at reverting any attempts to remove spoilers from Wikipedia articles. Happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Misato Fukuen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''[[Big Windup!]]'' (Chiyo Shinooka]]<ref name=mf-anime-roles/>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Aseptic Void page on WIKI

I have removend the blog links (they're not sel-published, anyway). The Cryo Chamber Label of Simon Heath (Atrium Carceri) and the Slender's Woods links are notables.

I think that Aseptic Void is a very notable composer. Thank you for your understanding.

- Mark — Preceding unsigned comment added by Max000damage (talk • contribs) 20:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melrose, Kansas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cherokee County and Neosho Township (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been nominated for a gift from the Wikimedia Foundation!

You have been selected to receive a merchandise giveaway. Please send us a message if you would like to claim your shirt. Thank you again for all you do! --JMatthews (WMF) (talk) 06:52, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! A gift from fellow Wikipedians.

You have been selected to receive a merchandise giveaway. We last contacted you on 3/11/2014. Please send us a message if you would like to claim your shirt. --JMatthews (WMF) (talk) 06:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the message! Just a question: how do I send a message confirming my wanting to claim the shirt, and what information do I need to give? Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:14, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

ProofHQ page style formatting

Hi, thanks for the notification - i demoted the headers, but would appreciate any other feedback on the page style as well. Cuttysc (talk) 06:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Blanking attack pages

Hi,

Thanks for nominating Joesph benton for deletion as an attack page. Just a reminder, when you do tag these types of pages, can you please blank the text of the article as well? This prevents any potentially libellous material from remaining on Wikipedia for any longer than necessary. Thank you! Stephen! ^Coming... 11:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. However, Twinkle already automatically blanked the page for me, so there's really no need to remind me. Happy editing! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:03, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Just went and checked the deleted page, as it sounded like there might have been an error in Twinkle as the text wasn't deleted when I looked... turns out not to be the case. The fault lies with the daft administrator (aka "me") who failed to notice that the original editor added stuff after you blanked it. My bad! Stephen! ^Coming... 09:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Question

Sir, I just posted my article "The Conflict of Asian Merchants in the Black Community" can you give me a more specific reason as to why my post is up for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ubstudent5488 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Wikipedia isn't a place where you post papers and the like. Such articles probably belong in a different website. Even if it was an attempt to write an article, it mainly appears to be about a subject which already has a Wikipedia article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you for the warm welcome!!

OPOS

My 1st post was deleted and i'm a very new user to Wiki and trying to understand what went wrong. I hope you get this message.

One Pot One Shot (OPOS) is a cooking technique widely spreading and used in India and my page was not promoting anything. It is purely explaining that form of cooking and sharing that information online. Since it is from India, this form of cooking is covered in newspapers, articles, TV but unfortunately, it didn't reach much online. To get online as a useful resources for others to refer to, Im bringing the information from all those sources in to WIKI to share with everyone and in English language. I don't think I did anything against WIKI guidelines. Please help me on it and let me know the approach i should take in order to make this information available in Wiki. I truly appreciate your help. Thanks a lot!

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at [[User talk:UBFOPOS (talk) 23:36, 4 May 2014 (UTC)|User talk:UBFOPOS (talk) 23:36, 4 May 2014 (UTC)]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello. I understand that Wikipedia's policies, particularly its notability guidelines can be quite confusing for newcomers, but let me put it this way. Has OPOS been discussed in a source that is reliable? As in, something you can trust? If it hasn't, then unfortunately it can't stay on Wikipedia. You can post about in on other sites such as Blogspot though, but Wikipedia is not the place for these things. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Re:Madoka work, and GA

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Artichoker's talk page.
Message added 23:41, 6 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Artichoker's talk page.
Message added 19:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC) ). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Cyber Sleek

Hello Narutolovehinata5. I am just letting you know that I deleted Cyber Sleek, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. GedUK  12:44, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Nolyn Casino

Hello Narutolovehinata5, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Nolyn Casino, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article makes an assertion of the subject's importance--take this to AfD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 13:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Sailor Moon RfC

Hi, Narutolovehinata5. Since the RfC has only four editors supporting the motion, should we get other users involved in this matter? I attempted to inform WP:VG and WP:COUNCIL about this but there is no response so far. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Well, there are two options. One, you could add the discussion to centralized discussion (although the discussion might be too niche to need it), and second, all of the most active members of both WikiProject Anime and manga, as well as WikiProject Japan could be contacted. What do you think? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:55, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Very good options, but I can decide on that a bit later. I'll go ahead and see what can be done. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:57, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Also, on an irrelevant note, can you please take a look at this? I'm planning to get the Sailor Moon article up to GA or FA status soon. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

• Follow-up: Since we finally have a consensus, I have merged it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Sailor Moon. Can you help me out here? Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:37, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello there! First of all, I don't think it's a good idea for you to have been the one to close it, since you participated in the discussion. The discussion should have been put up for a request for closure instead. (never mind this, I read the requests for closure page and it mentions that even involved editors can close a discussion) Second, you should notify all active members of WikiProject Anime and manga about the change, and leave a message on WikiProject Japan as well. Third, make sure you leave a notice at Wikipedia:WikiProject Sailor Moon and its talk page about the closure. Finally, I can't really help out with you, as I'm not experienced with WikiProject work. At most, you can ask help from some of the other members, such as Lucia Black, DragonZero or Juhachi. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:37, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Re:List of Pokémon (1–51)

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Artichoker's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi need your help

can you give ur email id.i am trying to create a wiki page of my company and it is getting deleted. Thank u. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avanishiitr (talk • contribs) 06:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Entry of Dr. Subrarta Dasgupta

Hi,

I have started a wiki entry on Dr. Subrata Dasgupta. The entry shows the following: The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for academics. Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic. If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. Find sources: "Subrata Dasgupta" – books · scholar · JSTOR · free images (May 2014)

This is a misplaced articles for creation submission. If it is not yet ready for article space, please consider moving it to project space rather than marking it for deletion. Note: If you are not an administrator please tag the redirect left behind after the move for deletion.

I am not sure how to fix these issues. I am writing to you as you have reviewed the entry. Any help is appreciated.

Regards, Anandi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akd2014 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Spoiler

Yes my friend except that the spoiler was not in the plot section it was in the introduction ! And what i deleted was already present in the plot section !, thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbaban (talk • contribs) 08:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Even so, content should not be deleted on the sole grounds that it is a spoiler. And we have a number of articles which do have plot details on the lead. There's nothing to spoil in DBZ anyway, it's just episode after episode for a battle, sometimes taking a whole episode for one attack. This isn't The Mousetrap or Puella Magi Madoka Magica. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

What you are doing is clearly a kind of pathetic power play , you are not being logical , the information I deleted was already there in the plot section don't you get that ?? , maybe you can check before rushing into showing off and deleting people's edit before even what is it based upon , and clearly you are not fan of a manga which meant a lot for a huge amount if people , I myself when I first opened the article , I didn't intend to to read the plot section because I didn't want to have a spoiler , to my surprise they put information regarding the ending on the introduction ! I dare you to see such a thing in well written specially American shows articles , but apparently you have deep problems with your real life that you try to have this weird kind of control here , be logical .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbaban (talk • contribs) 09:08, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Distributed Leadership

Hello Narutolovehinata5. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Distributed Leadership to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Canal Lake

Hello Narutolovehinata5. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Canal Lake, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is not a duplicate of Kawartha Lakes in whole or in part. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Wildcat Baseball League Speedy Deletion answer

I am the creator of the Wildcat Baseball League page. Here is a page relating to this league.

http://sportsillustrated.ca/vault/article/magazine/MAG1067140/index.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eatmorepies (talk • contribs) 03:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Re:Madoka again

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Artichoker's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Artichoker^[talk] 04:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Mami Kawada

Hey, I just took a look at Mami Kawada. I think you've done a good job so far. Here are some suggestions I have if you are planning on eventually taking it to GAN:

• If you can find any sources discussing aspects of her music styles, work ethic, influence, reception, personal life, etc. it can be incorporated as additional sections in the article. Right now it mostly just talks about her career: dates when she released albums, what animes she has been involved with, etc. Although I understand that this singer is obviously not as well known as someone like, say Rihanna, so sourcing for some of these topics may be sparse or nonexistent.
• The prose of the article will need to be improved, it's a somewhat choppy reading right now, so work on combining and the transitions of sentences. Also several of the shorter one-line paragraphs could be merged.
• Eventually the lead will need to be expanded, although I'd recommend not worrying about that until most of the rest of the article is nearing completion.

Overall good work though! Let me know if you have any questions about my points above.

As an addendum, in regards to a "Themes" section for the Madoka Magica article, I agree that I think it's unnecessary at this point. Although there are a few other articles that do incorporate such a section, such as Cowboy Bebop, I think discussion about Madoka Magica's themes are already well integrated into the Production section, and am not sure if there is enough content to justify extracting it out and giving it a whole new section. Artichoker^[talk] 01:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. Here are my thoughts:

• Unfortunately, you are correct in your observation: given that she's relatively obscure even in her home country of Japan (while her singles and albums do relatively well on the charts, her sales are at best good for anime releases but poor when compared to mainstream releases), sources for her, even in Japanese, will be hard to come by. Information on her personal life is limited (for example, like several lesser known anime celebrities, we don't even know her age! But it is known that she has a younger brother, which could be sourced through her blog posts, though adding that might be considered trivia), and what can be normally found of her personal life is mostly information such as her favorite food, colors, etc., which would be considered unencyclopedic.
• The prose, I agree, is what needs most work in the article. Right now, the article is nothing more than a discography in prose. The bulk of the article content was originally written by a user who's since retired (although since he is also an I've Sound fan I was able to contact him and now we regularly talk to each other on Facebook), although pretty much all of the post-2012 content was written by me. When I started work on the article, it was almost entirely unreferenced and needed copyediting, both of which I have been doing for more than two years. I had been thinking that perhaps I could move all the information about single/album sales and charting information into a "Reception" article or the likes of one, along with critical reception of at least some of her musical work (which would be hard to come by, first because reliable music reviews in Japan are rare, and second, as I mentioned earlier, because she's a non-mainstream artist whose work is given relatively little notice by sources). Interviews of her do exist (some of which were posted on the article's talk page), which are mostly to do with her individual releases, though these could prove useful in a "Style and influences" section, which will probably be easier to write than a "Personal life" section.
• I'm using several articles as a basis for the structure and prose of the article, such as Aki Toyosaki and Mamoru Miyano, and to a lesser extent, ClariS, Supercell (band) and LiSA (Japanese musician, born 1987), and even the articles of her friends Kotoko (singer) and Maon Kurosaki. ClariS onwards are what I used for aiming for B-class, while the articles for Toyosaki and Miyano are what I am using for aiming for GA-class. In the case of Toyosaki and Miyano's articles (both of which are GAs), they too do not have much information on their personal life, but they discuss their careers in detail, and the reception and awards they received for their work, something I plan to emulate for Kawada's article, since I believe that this is the only way her article could pass GA given that there's so little information on her personal life.

I appreciate the feedback, and when I have the time, I'll try to apply some of these comments to the article, particularly about her musical style and influences. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

That's a good idea. Definitely emulate the styles of those GA articles. And take full advantage of any and all reliable interviews with her. There is usually a ton of great info to be harvested from types of sources such as those. Artichoker^[talk] 03:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

@Artichoker: Just an update, albeit 3 months late. I finally fixed some of the transitions between paragraphs and merged the shorter ones. Sadly, I'm losing hope on finding sources for the two: critical reception for her music, and sourced information on her personal life. Assuming I'd write a second on her personal life, given the sources available, it would look something like this:

Kawada has a younger brother.

Yes, it would be that short. Even her interviews don't give much information on her style, influences, etc., and if anything, the interviews would be better off being used as sources for the articles on her various singles (which, with the exception of Joint (song) are all stubs). It seems that her obscurity and fading popularity are making me face an uphill battle to break the status quo. How can I improve the article now? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

The article is looking better. If sourcing doesn't exist for any of her personal life, then that's okay; the article doesn't necessarily need it if nothing exists. However, not having any information regarding critical reception/commentary for her music does kind of hurt. Are you sure there are no sources with involving reviews of her albums, singles, etc.? Artichoker^[talk] 03:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

@Artichoker: None I'm afraid, even in Japanese. I already searched a long time ago, and reliable reviews for her (or for any primarily anime singer for that matter) simply don't seem to exist. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

If those sources don't exist, and you've scraped everything else, then the article would be considered comprehensive. There's nothing wrong with a small article, if that's all that existing sources allow. If you truly believe the article to be comprehensive, give it a copyedit and take it to GA. Cheers! Artichoker^[talk] 17:14, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

@Artichoker: Is it alright if I send it to another peer review before requesting a copyedit? Because, if ever, I could need some help with the writing of some of the prose, particularly the lede. That way, any kinks can be sorted out, and eventually, I could take it to GAN. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Absolutely. You know what state the article is in better than I do. Oftentimes prudence is the best choice. Artichoker^[talk] 23:05, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

@Artichoker: The article's peer review ended recently, and I made a few more copyedits. I hope the article looks better now; it took me 30 minutes or so to revise the grammar. I also did a partial rewrite of the lede section. I feel like putting it up for another peer review soon, but it might not pass GA given that (as mentioned above), information about style and influences cannot be found. Also, I don't think she has won any awards either (she doesn't even have a gold record). Given the backlog at GAN, even if I did nominate it, it could take some time before it gets reviewed. It's not like I could ask an uninvolved editor who specializes in music to take a look, right? What do you think? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

At this point, I don't think yet another peer review is going to be as valuable, as I wonder what else it could add to the table that the last one didn't. As for seeking a specializing editor, I think that's a good idea. I'm not familiar with any music editors, so I unfortunately don't have any suggestions for you, but I think this is a good path to take to get some more insight into how close the article is to GA status. Artichoker^[talk] 22:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

@Artichoker: By the way: how's the new lede? Does it feel better than the old one? It's my first attempt at writing a lede that's a basic summary of article content. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

I think it's good and an improvement! Artichoker^[talk] 02:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello,

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Ramya Balasundaram's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ramya Balasundaram (talk) 07:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Narutolovehinata5, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Vatsan34 (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Doraemon

If you look back it wasn't just the one IP. Here's a similar edit with the same edit summary from 19 July and same edit summary from 14 July. Also back in May there were problems as well. Probably best to leave it at three months for now. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 06:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 23 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Aki Toyosaki page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Kathnielofficial

Notwithstanding your helpful comment, I blocked the account anyway because of the "official". Even though I know a lot of people use that without any connection because it's common in Twitter accounts, it implies some sort of formal role, so it came under "softerblock". Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Aki Toyosaki singles charts

I put in the Oricon charts for Aki Toyosaki's singles discography, although I haven't looked for Japan Hot 100 or RIAJ information. I looked up her first single but it ranked 15th on the Billboard Japan Hot Singles but not on the Japan Hot 100, so could you help look through the other major singles and see if any of them charted? If there isn't information we can remove those columns from the table, but almost all her singles are clearly in that Oricon rank 11-20 category, which is good for a seiyuu singer. Also if you know of any more awards for singing that would help out too. -AngusWOOF (talk) 16:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Flo'Ball page

why to delete the page? there is an italian page, which was admitted and it's part of the list of teamsports.

the sport is trying to gain new followers, for sure, but still it was registrated in italy, so it IS a sport.

there are many pages with less informations about other sports, this page has all the complete informations.

the second link in the notes is not promotional: is an italian sports news site, talking about the events conducted by AIFB in the past: it's not promotion, at least is social news. (and it was a goal reached by the initiative).

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikko it (talk • contribs) 13:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC) 

Unfortunately, the second link is not what we would call "significant" coverage (see WP:SIGCOV). Also, I don't know Italian, but from a glance at the page, there also seemed to have been a promotional tone to the text of the link. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Importance assessments

Thanks for posting the assessment requests for the voice actors and the visual novels. I've bumped many of them to Mid, left some of the others that need better reception write-ups or stuff that maybe someone else on the project can help with. -AngusWOOF (talk) 20:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Invitation: WikiProject Autism

Greetings! You are hereby invited to WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of autism, Asperger syndrome, and autistic culture on Wikipedia. As the project emphasizes contribution from autistic editors, it is especially interested in you, who have chosen to list yourself at Category:Wikipedians with autism. Muffinator (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia ads	file info – #251

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of indoor arenas in Portugal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• following is a '''list of indoor arenas in [[Portugal]''', ordered by capacity. The venues are by their final capacity after construction for

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

editing problems ,what am i want to do next,in simple?

sir,

   my edits does not inculcate, please give me short tipsRthavan (talk) 09:15, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

2012 Philippine film Award Season

Hi I saw that you nominated this for deletion and I saw your explanation. Can we change the title instead? let say 2012 Philippine Film Awards? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sompat11 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

hi Nawidafghan (talk) 04:45, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Prosperosity's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion declined: Demonization of Vladimir Putin

Hello Narutolovehinata5. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Demonization of Vladimir Putin, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: WP:CSD#G10 is for pages that "Pages that disparage, threaten, intimidate or harass their subject or some other entity, and serve no other purpose". This is not one. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 09:59, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Attack page?

Hi,

You warned me at my talkpage not to create attack page. Will you please be so kind to clarify what is the article I created to " disparage or threaten its subject" or which article I created is "biographical material which is entirely negative in tone and unsourced"?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:34, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

I just noticed that you referred to Demonization of Vladimir Putin and that your position is rejected (diff). Please be more carefull next time before you template the editors who have been around for a while. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

why was my

i posted somthing on wikipedia and it was deleted may i know why ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sublimation1998 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Kana Hanazawa

Erm, regarding your edit:

As per MOS:WORKS#Ordering, lists of works should be ordered chronologically, not alphabetically. Otherwise I see no problem with your formatting. Also, I wouldn't worry about removing the year subheadings, (you can if you want i guess, unless someone advises you not to...). If the year is there, it's a lot of extra effort trying to change such a common format that's not explicitly "wrong".

Also, as a side note, usually when you order titles alphabetically, "The" is ignored, so that for example "The Garden of Words" would be listed with the "G" titles not the "T" titles. I'm not sure if that's in the Mos though. Thanks,—Msmarmalade (talk) 14:47, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Oh okay. Just make the necessary fixes. You should have told me earlier though, it took me like three hours to make that edit, half of which involved rearranging the roles! I could have saved more time if I had known. Happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Done. I feel for you that you spent so much time on it. I usually sort by hand as well. Well now you know :P. Anyway, thanks for all the other details of that edit :) —Msmarmalade (talk) 15:40, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome. The biography section could use some expansion, though. I'll try to do the same to Houko Kuwashima's article soon. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews

Hello Narutolovehinata5. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Houko Kuwashima may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''[[RahXephon]]'' (2002) – [[Characters in RahXephon|Quon Kisaragi]])<ref name=doi-roles />

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:58, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Want to know

Hello sir

I have made one page about Software Suggest company. I want to know that how I will make a page for this company. I have read rules for creating a page but I am very confuse about it. So Please let me know how I will write about this company. Can you help me to create article about this Company...?

Speedy delete tag removed

Hey there, I accidentally noticed that your speedy delete tag has been deleted out-of-process, see [[1]]. Some content has been added afterwards so things have changed meanwhile, but you might better check this yourself. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:01, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Puella Magi Madoka Magica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dub. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Lord Marksman and Vanadis#Current_Status - To do

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Lord Marksman and Vanadis#Current_Status - To do. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 09:46, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Template:Z48

Happy New Year!

Dear Narutolovehinata5,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 08:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page.

Happy New Year!

Dear Narutolovehinata5,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--Coolfoolz (talk) 14:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page.

Please add the details of the latest issues and chapters of the English/Japanese version of the manga Hayate the Combat Butler on the article List of Hayate the Combat Butler chapters. The article is outdated. Please update it as soon as possible. Thanks. Coolfoolz (talk) 14:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Possible sockfarm

Good grief. I started trying to do some cleanup around the article for Haunted Party and it looks like there's a possible sock farm. The more I look, the more I see more and more SPAs that were opened just to try to re-create the article, edit it, or so on. I think I've tagged all of them and plopped them in Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of PeterJohnston12345, but I'm unsure whether or not to block the ones that haven't edited since November. What's your thought on this? I'm trying to avoid doing blocks for the time being, but the few blocks I've made just now (for the socks/meats that edited very recently) are ones that couldn't be avoided. They're not quite stale just yet but they haven't really edited recently. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

• Ugh... I just fell so deep into the rabbit hole that I think I broke my foot. It looks like these are all socks of User:Aron&April654321. I was looking to see if I could find more potential socks (via User:Fairytale65's edits) and found a link to User:Jackgriffo5, who edited Anthony Ilott and Joe Gaminara. An additional look showed that Fairytale65 *also* edited alongside User:PoolerBear, who is a confirmed sock of Aron&April654321. A look at the edits shows that Haunted Party is a re-titled Scary House, which was one of the articles that these socks have been trying to add. (sighs) I really don't want to open up a new SPI to look for sweepers. I'm going to tag Ponyo and Mike V since they dealt with the last SPI for these guys. I'm going to re-tag the accounts as socks of Aron&April654321 since there's more than enough evidence now to show that it's all part of that group, but I don't know if it'd be worth sweeping for sleepers or not. I'm also going to block all of the accounts since there's enough evidence to warrant blocks all around. (sighs again) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

• This is so messy I'm just going to take it to SPI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

• It's at SPI now, if you want to weigh in any. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

• It looks like it got even more messy. I found evidence that this is linked to another sockfarm that predates the Aron&April stuff. Yeeks. Long story short, it looks like this guy Anthony Ferando is continually trying to add various hoax articles to Wikipedia and the tell is that he's always listed in the cast somewhere. Apparently the Scary House and Haunted Party articles were originally a hoax article for Scary Movie 6 where he listed himself as the main actor. From there it just sort of spiraled into various different things, so I guess we'll all have to try to keep an eye out for any articles that list him as an actor and have a similar writing style- odds are that they're hoaxes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Doesn't matter anymore right now since the article's been deleted and salted. Good job. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 06:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Help through revision of article

Hi Narutolovehinata5,

Thanks for reviewing the page i created. I'll edit the english to be sure i didn't leave any mistake or incorrect syntax. Can you guide me through "additional citations for verification"? Is there a particular part of the text i should provide more citations?

Thanks for your help!

Westanna (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Westanna

Re: Mami Kawada GA

I think you have a pretty good chance of getting this article up to GA in its current state. The thing about the current WP:GAN process is that if you nominate it now, it probably won't be reviewed for another 6 months or more, so if you want to get the article up to GA this year, you should try to nominate it soon. I plan on doing the same to ClariS in the next month or so once I actually get around to writing a musical style and influences section (which I suspect will be shorter than the one you wrote for Kawada, but oh well ).--十八 02:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

I see. But I don't feel like nominating it for GAN any time soon. I feel that it's not yet complete. Not when there's still not enough information regarding her personal life that can be used. I'll probably wait for some major event in her career before doing so (perhaps once she announces her next album or if he holds a major concert?). Also, I feel like doing a musical style/influences section for LiSA as well (given that she's my second favorite artist), though I guess in her case it will be much easier to find sources given that she's twice or thrice as popular as Kawada. What do you think?

Also, a side-note: do you believe that ClariS (either the original one or the current one with Karen) will ever reveal their identities in the long run, or will they remain a Japanese version of Daft Punk? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh, well whenever you want to nominate Mami Kawada is fine; she's one of my all-time favorite artists, so I'd love to see her article at GA someday. I think a musical style/influences section for LiSA would be great if you can find the sources. It was hard enough finding enough when I wrote Supercell (band)#Musical style and influences, and ClariS' is probably gonna be half that length if I'm lucky. I just haven't found very many sources which discuss their music in detail. ClariS is about to perform at the Budokan in a few days, and I doubt it'll be behind a curtain like before, so it's possible they're about to at least reveal what they look like. And since they're about to graduate high school, I don't think there will be any more reason to keep their identities secret, unless they want to retain that as their "gimmick". Alice, however, will most likely always remain a mystery, unless she comes back as a soloist in a few years (which I'm dying to happen, since I loved her voice more than Clara/Karen, who sound exactly the same to me).--十八 06:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

I see. Thanks for the comments. I really do love Mami and I wish she was more popular. To this day, the fact that Break a spell flopped horribly, both in sales and at the charts, still gives me a sad feeling in my heart. I actually visited Japan in July of last year, and despite Break a spell only being released in February of that year, not a single music store I went to (I went to about five) had it, and out of the five, only a single one (Gamers Akihabara) had her CDs at all (even Animate, which according to the book A Geek in Japan is the largest anime store in Akiba, had none of her CDs in stock, excluding the I've compilation album Outflow which I guess doesn't count). Also, it seems that virtually every Japanese I asked outside of the stores in Akiba didn't even know her. Shame.

Oh, and as for LiSA, I think I've seen that she has tons of interviews. LisAni and the like should have a few. You should also be easily be able to find sources as well. I'm also going to ask Prosperosity if he knows anything that can be used. What do you think?

And by the way, which one was Alice again? I've liked ClariS for almost 4 years and yet I still don't know which was which? Was Alice the one with the deeper voice, or the one with the softer voice? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

That's a shame to hear that about Kawada. I wouldn't have thought she was that unknown after being in the industry for so many years. As for interivews and the like that I could scrape for ClariS, I did manage to find a few, all of which I've already used in the main article and a few of the albums/singles articles, but among them, there wasn't much that could go in a musical style/influences section that I could find. LisAni may be a good source, but most of its content is offline and thus not available to read. Alice sings at a slightly deeper octave than Clara, who has a more 'softer' voice as you put it. You can see who sings what for some songs at this blog. I feel that Alice had a more unique voice than Clara, and considering that I can't tell Clara and Karen apart, it makes listening to the new ClariS slightly less interesting.--十八 08:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Lisa articles

Translating 27 articles on a musician I'm not super familiar with would be a full-time job! I'm not sure if I have time for that, sorry! According to this, she planned to go to Animax Carnival Philippines 2013, which got cancelled due to a typhoon. She probably didn't even get the chance to land in the country then, I suppose! --Prosperosity (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

You don't actually have to translate all 27 articles though. Just sections of said articles that could potentially be useful. If what's needed is only a single paragraph in an entire article, for example, then that's all that needs to be translated. Also, don't remind me about that event. I was going to go to it, but then everything went horribly wrong. Well, at least we got King Gustav and Pope Francis in exchange. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:02, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Metrolite

I have checked that you had added maintanence templates such as {{coi}} and {{third-party|date=February 2015}} to Metrolite, I agree with them. You may want to keep a eye on it, after a couple of day we can bring it to AfD, I don't see any significant amount of notability. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filinvest Land, Inc..
Message added 01:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Hello, my name is Lily Baxter. Check out my new article I made!! Weirdalmaster27 (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Classroom Crisis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Classroom Crisis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classroom Crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikipedia 02:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

How speedily my article was deleted

You posted a message on my talk page stating that my article on How to Learn a Foreign Language had been proposed for speedy deletion, but that if I wanted to, I could contest that. It was deleted in 20 minutes, before I could. I consider this discourteous. deisenbe (talk) 14:02, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 31 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Mami Kawada page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Make sure you are checking that a term is invented before tagging it as such. A quick search shows that catacoustics is a real word, and can be found in the Oxford English Dictionary. That being said, this is just a dictionary definition, and already has an entry on Wiktionary, so this should be deleted, I re-tagged it for No context. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

About my edit on Kantai Collection.

The source is from Toyo Keizai. Please recheck its reliability. C933103 (talk) 15:35, 25 April 2015 (UTC) @C933103: Nevertheless, it's hard to argue how the information is relevant to the over-all article. Please first discuss on the talk page if the statement should be added to the article. If the consensus says that it can, then go ahead. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:05, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

(FYI) Replied on Talk:Kantai Collection. --benlisquare_T•C•E 18:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Edit rejection

Hi, I've responded to your talk message.

Edit: Never mind, I have discussed it in help chat

deletion discussion of Marilyn Monroe mural D.C

I have redirected this to Marilyn Monroe mural. You are welcome to nominate the latter for deletion but I would suggest doing it as a separate nomination. Mangoe (talk) 12:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

A beer for you!

thank alot Ceechrison (talk) 22:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Lakun.patra. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Ad-exchange, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Lakun.patra (talk) 12:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined

I declined your speedy deletion nomination of Goel TMT because the criterion does not applies. A7 does not applies to articles with assertion of notability. The appropriate deletion criterion is G12 because almost all the contents of the article was copied from its own website. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 14:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

@Wikicology: Does G11 also apply? In many of these cases, the "copyright violations" are actually posted by users who appear to be affiliated with relevant companies, and apparently these users create such articles as a form of promotion. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:05, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

I agree with you on WP:COI but in the case of obvious COI, the editor involved may be advised on how to edit such article. I often point them to this guideline. However, G11 does not applies to articles with Minor promotional wording. I normally try as much as possible to remove the promotional contents to save such articles if its actually a notable one. In the case of the deleted page, Goel TMT, its actually not eligible for G11. The promotional wording may be removed if the organization. is actually notable. Cheers! Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 19:27, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

This was not a hoax

Hello! I am wondering why you tagged the article Lamont Johnson (jazz bassist) as G3 - meaning that you thought it was a blatant and obvious hoax. A quick Google search would have revealed that he is real. I have removed the tag and I am in the process of expanding the article, but I am curious what made you think it was a hoax? --MelanieN (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

MelanieN, You need not be curious. Although the page is certainly not a hoax and I'm sure they would have realized their mistake. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 21:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

@Wikicology: @MelanieN: I did a search for the person (including his DOB) and a search resulted in absolutely no results whatsoever, which lead me to believe that it was a hoax. If it was a mistake then I am sorry for it. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

No reason to worry. this one and several other sources verified and confirmed the existence of the article's subject, therefore not eligible for G3. The criterion (G3) does not applies to article with at least one source, even if the source is not reliable as long as it establish the existence of the subject of the article. Regards! Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 22:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Wakaba Girl for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wakaba Girl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wakaba Girl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 17:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Do you realize you nominated a redirect page for WP:CSD#A7 speedy deletion? The page in question has been moved to Rana Tarakji, but I don't think A7 applies because a credible assertion of notability is made. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

@WikiDan61: That's strange! When I opened the article the page wasn't a redirect. You must have been moved it at the exact same time that I tagged it. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Well the page is deleted now, but when I looked at the history, there was a 5 minute difference between me creating the redirect (per the move) and you tagging. Could just be server lag. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

My Article was Misunderstood

I believe that you though that my article,Crafter (character),was about a web series character,you misunderstood it the article is about a character from a popular book,I even have proof in the second paragraph of this page:http://www.skyponypress.com/book/?GCOI=61608108388690& . Please don't delete my article the book series is very popular so I believe it's worthy of an individual page.--Minedigger (talk) 13:16, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

From the looks of things, the character is from a Minecraft online series, which would qualify it for speedy deletion as web content. If I am mistaken, I don't think he's still notable enough for a separate article: the book doesn't even have its own article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Mamiko Noto article

I've started to convert Mamiko Noto's filmography to a table format. I've tagged all entries there as citation needed but the tags for each one can be removed if they appear on her Mausu profile or replaced with Doi's database. Will get to that later. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:24, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: Well, as long as that ugly BLP sources tag at the top is removed. There's still a ton of work to do, and Noto's article is far from the only article on a well-known voice actress (or actor) whose article has major sourcing problems. You (and in fact the whole WikiProject) should work on them too, it's probably one of the biggest works that the WikiProject needs to do. This should probably include either looking for free images for people, or requesting for them (like, say, asking the agencies politely if they could donate images). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

I've gone through the discography portion of the article and made some heavy edits, mostly around the drama CDs, singles and albums. The albums and singles I've left only the ones that made a dent in Oricon and have her as the featured artist rather than compilations where she is only on one track (1 singles collection album, 1 sort-of album character CD, and 9 singles character CD). The drama CDs I only picked the five in Doi's database. There are a bunch of other CDs in Doi's second list that could be added but didn't see much notability for them – a lot are just supplementary material for anime titles for her most popular characters like Nogizaka or the Strawberry 100%/Marshmallow series, Tomoe / Queen's Blade, etc., so I left them out. I've checked most entries against her profile, so next is to hit some of her major anime and video game works and removing those individual entries. Should we remove the blanket tag or wait until the individual tags get down to a small fraction? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: Perhaps, as a compromise, until most of the cn tags are reduced, the BLP sources tag can be demoted to a BLP sources section tag and be moved to the Filmography section. Still better than having the said article at the top. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I've moved it to the More footnotes tag. Walking through ANN's news archive to fill in many of her roles now. Also upgraded her to Mid importance; she's in a ton of anime shows as leading characters and was nominated for Seiyu Awards in its first edition. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Bernadette Caine Llanto

Hello Narutolovehinata5. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bernadette Caine Llanto, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Obvious newbie attempt at an article; certainly not vandalism. Thank you. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:58, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

@Opabinia regalis: I tagged the article as G3 not because it was vandalism but because the article was a blatant hoax: there is no Philippine television writer by that name, and she had never worked on the series mentioned in the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Ahh, I see; thanks for following up. If you tag with multiple criteria, the combined tag only shows the most general version of each problem. Looked like the usual case of someone trying to write about themselves. I userfied the article and tagged it as a user draft, which comes with a noindex. I'll take a look tomorrow to see if the user does anything else with it. Opabinia regalis (talk) 09:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Post-midnight dates

Japanese (more familiar with Chinese btw) do note the validity, but its more of a niche thing. Anime is popular, but older guests (which I typically deal with) have little care of the subject of anime and manga. Discussing post-midnight times basically boils down to the "in progress" type thing. The concept that the "day doesn't change till the sun comes up" is definitely a dated one and is losing some ground. It used to be that the "night hours" were part of the same day - regardless of the "clock time". In modern days, that's a bit of an outdated thing, but for the purpose of advertising and telling guests to "stay up or plan for the event" definitely still works. You'll find that such listings are not universal, but when we have a show at 1:00 a.m. our guests typically arrive at 10 p.m. before the show starts. Hence the "深夜" in "週三深夜1時". English has rare examples as well, like fireworks after a double header in sporting or shows in cabarets and bars. For example, you have three acts in the cabaret, one at 10:30 p.m., one at 11:30 p.m. and one at 12:30 a.m. - the advertisement would list all three acts for the same date despite the third act being post-midnight. The reason being that the guests who stayed for the first two acts are not leaving and returning on a "different day" for the third act. While practically rare and unusual, most cases do not need to notate whether or not the person performed in the past on such a date and time - but for an encyclopedia or other record, it is the case. Events "in progress" thus go by the establishments calendar day (open and close cycle) for most cases. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:36, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

@ChrisGualtieri: The problem is whether or not the advertising date should nonetheless be used in an encyclopedia article. Advertising and writing an encyclopedia are two completely different beasts. While they have a similar purpose (to spread information), there is a crucial difference: in advertising, you are trying to persuade people to use/go to your product/service/location/event, whereas an encyclopedia's goal is to inform and nothing else. What works in a poster outside of a cabaret may not on an encyclopedia with almost 5 million articles. Each media has its own standards to follow. With that said, one of the main reasons why I am against the format that you are a proponent of is that, to put it simply, it's misinformation. Even with the footnote, saying that a show first aired on a particular date even though it actually aired the day after is misleading. For example, imagine the statement "Anime X premiered on January 1, 2000 [footnote: the show aired on January 2, 2000]". It's confusing to the readers, it's misleading since it makes you (at least initially) think that the show aired at a date different from an actual date, and as I've repeatedly mentioned, it violates the MOS (whether or not MOS is biased towards Western concepts is beside the point). Readers could complain about being mislead, even if the footnote is included; in fact, they might actually become even more confused because of the footnote. By contrast, the statement "Anime X premiered on January 2, 2000 [footnote: the show officially premiered on January 1, 2000 at 25:00]" is more factual and accurate, and would be an easier and less confusing introduction to non-informed readers of the Japanese practice of media dates, because the first thing they will see is the date that it actually premiered, meaning the date used for listing purposes such as databases. Besides, imagine the theoretical situation I mentioned in the discussion: of the anime which was advertised to premiere on December 31 but actually aired on January 1: what year should be used when listing in categories? I am perfectly aware that the threshold for inclusion on Wikipedia is verifiability and not the truth, but the thing is, Wikipedia also strives to be accurate (which has been a problem for many years), and using the media date in articles would be anything but accurate. In any case, both dates can be verified, and as mentioned by Juhachi on his userpage, even Japanese sources are gradually moving to the use of actual airdates. The planned change merely reflects that. Another possible issue is a technical one: while this may not be very common in most cases, there can be instances among certain devices when the footnote or the footnotes list simply won't show, perhaps due to technical issues/incompatibilities or loading problems. In this case, it would be a case of making more accessible information (in this case, the date of broadcast) that the reader is looking for. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:59, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miho Karasawa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lantis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Henry

Hi. I've declined your made-up as it appears to be a real series of games. How notable it is another question. Google gives 1600 hits which come down to 60 when you look at page 7. Probably a prod case. Peridon (talk) 15:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

@Peridon: Would it be alright for you for me to take the articles to AfD instead? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:08, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

No problems here. Peridon (talk) 15:09, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Deletion and request for the article to thrive,

I do hereby request that my article be reconsidered for submission and if not , my content please be respectfully returned on my talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meritempest (talk • contribs) 11:04, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Mami Kawada edit

Thanks for clarifying her involvement with Love Planet Five. Can you add some of that detail to her biography so it doesn't look like a one-album/song collaboration? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: It might be a bit difficult to find sources for that (especially now that I've Sound redesigned their website), so I'll probably get to it when I update her page when her new album (Parablepsia) comes out on the 16th. Remember that Love Planet Five wasn't really much of a band but was more of the unofficial name for I've Sound's line-up at the time (KOTOKO, Kawada, Eiko Shimamiya, MELL, and Kaori Utatsuki). By the way, could you take another look at LiSA (Japanese musician, born 1987) and its corresponding peer review? I made more fixes to the article the other day. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, subunits can be a bit tricky. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a one-off thing and that it was promoted independently of I've Sound in order to keep the name in the associated_acts. I'll take a look at the LiSA article later; it's good that it got reviewed by some folks outside of the WT:ANIME project. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Dr robert young

Hi,for this page I marked it for blp-prod,but can you explain such short article that you marked it for G11?--User:Gmaildamn (User talk:Gmaildamn) 11:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

@Gmaildamn: Well, in this case, BLPPROD wasn't necessary. The article did not show a credible claim to notability for its subject, meaning, it did not explain why Young deserves a Wikipedia article. This is why it qualified for A7. As for G11, well, the tone of the article was borderline promotional. It doesn't help that the article creator appeared to be Dr. Young himself. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Hi can you please review the article strike off fighting championship, it is getting deleted no matter I made changes. Strikeoff1 (talk) 14:15, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

re Two articles and GAN

Hello. Since sometime last year, I had been planning to nominate for GA status the two following articles: Mami Kawada and LiSA (Japanese musician, born 1987), which I and other users have been working on for quite some time. However, I wanted to make sure that both articles are at a quality where they have a shot at GA before nominating them for GA status. Given that you seem to be experienced with GANs, do you think either article could pass a GA? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm not particularly knowledgeable, specifically, about those topics. However, what I would recommend is you go through and point-by-point compare to all the criteria at WP:Good article criteria. Then, compare to some recently promoted WP:Featured articles on the same topics, and see how they stack up as compared to overall structure, layout, lede size, etc. Good luck, — Cirt (talk) 05:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

@Cirt: In any case, I've nominated for GA LiSA's article. If you could refer the article to someone who has more knowledge of musician GANs then that would be appreciated. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps try posting neutrally-worded, matter-of-fact notices to talk pages of relevant WikiProjects, like Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music ? I hope that's helpful, — Cirt (talk) 05:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Anatole Krasnyansky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anatole Krasnyansky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anatole Krasnyansky until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhuwan

Hello Narutolovehinata5. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3),or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Bhuwan. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.Template:Z149. The same principles apply to placing a G2 speedy on a page one minute after a new editor has made their one and only edit. A new editor is entitled to a decent opportunity to try and create an adequate page, and limiting them to one minute and one edit obviously doesn't fly. If we had a zero tolerance policy for technical gaffes, we might have nine editors left. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 03:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Department Of

Hi Narutolovehinata5, I wasn't exactly sure of the editing process on the deletion log and was hoping to figure out how I could get my voice heard. The community of wiki moderators seemed swift to censor and put the post up for deletion delete without thorough explanation of how one could defend their page. After reading through the 5 pillars of wikipedia it seems that the only comedic publication at a university (with 10,000+ potential readers) started by a group of undergraduate women could be deemed notable, especially given the gender divide in the world of comedy. The definition of notable is subjective, however if you have a particular definition of what is 'notable' and what is 'not notable' I would be more than happy to hear it out (it is not specifically described in the wiki guidelines). If you were to be the sole judge of what is and is not notable, that is in and of itself another form of censorship something I'm sure the wikipedia community frowns upon. Chinese leaders have deemed the Tiananmen Square Protests as "not notable" enough to put in textbooks and the leadership of the state of Texas also felt that Thomas Jefferson was not 'notable' enough to be in a US History textbook. I'm obviously not equating these instances of censorship with the potential deletion of this page, however I thought it was worth bringing up the example to convey a point that it would be in some respects unfair to delete this page solely because you deem it to be "un-notable".

Though I realize that this comedic publication is not the NY Times or the Yale Record, I feel that it is odd to name a comedic magazine that caters to 10,000+ students and alumni as not notable. We have added a few more links to the page to provide some evidence of its existence. I understand that the title of the publication is very vague, but were hoping to hear your thoughts on what else we could do to fulfill the community guidelines.

thanks for reading! Gloriafrankensteinem (talk) 20:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)gloriafrankensteinem

Deleted article (NGS Recordings) why ??

With all the respect why my article deleted ? i don't understand well with the specific example the reason for!! can you send me more simple specifically correction parts for my articles or references or whatever is to correct it ?? By the way my page article is NGS Recordings that was deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marios Nicou Charalambus (talk • contribs) 18:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of LiSA (Japanese musician, born 1987)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article LiSA (Japanese musician, born 1987) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 01:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Dear User Narutolovehinata5, Just wondering why you hated on my first article called Seven Different Leadership Styles. Regardless of you nominating my page for speedy deletion, I need to receive a copy of my article. I compiled this information for an entire semester during my Doctoral Program, and I would like a copy of my final article. Please email me a copy of my deleted article to sheimroch@gmail.com. Thank you. Sheimroch (talk) 05:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Re: Mami Kawada

The article looks pretty good. One thing I wonder is why there is no info about the year she was born. Like with LiSA, I would recommend splitting the lead in two paragraphs as well as adding a brief intro to the Discography section. If you are still unsure whether this could become a GA, ask for a peer review like what I did with Kamiya Kaoru. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

@Tintor2: The answer to that question is very simple: she hasn't revealed her year of birth. I've sent it to peer review three separate times, and in the last one a comment given was that it's really close to GA status. Anyway, should I nominate the article for GA, would it be okay for you to review it, or is it better for me to ask someone else to review it? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:55, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

I would say go nominate it if you think it is well written.Tintor2 (talk) 16:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Also about that Madoka peer review, I would advise you to write others' peer reviews while promoting your own peer review. That's at least how it worked for Kamiya Kaoru's peer review. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Thing is, I don't exactly have experience with peer reviewing other articles. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

GoogleTrans gadget can do machine translation on Content Translation system

Hi there,

I noticed your request for Japanese language support for the Content Translation system at

[[2]]

You can try the GoogleTrans gadget, if you wish. It now does machine translation for Japanese to other languages, using the Google translation engine.

Help for this is at:

[[3]]

You can try the version of the gadget that uses the Yandex translation engine if you are translating from Cyrillic languages. Help for this is at:

[[4]]

I, myself, am an intermediate French reader, but since the French-English pair is quite good for Google, I have translated 24 frwiki articles on French forts to the enwiki in the last 6 weeks.

I'm not sure about the quality of the Japanese-English translation engine. Any feedback you can give on this would be most useful.

There is a Japanese Help page for GoogleTrans at:

[[5]]

Endo999 (talk) 22:53, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Narutolovehinata5, why did you do this?

My page was meant to be a school project and i was so close to finishing. You need to learn dignity and respect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lachlan1258 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

ArenaCube page nomination

Hello Narutolovehinata5,

I understand your point why you classified the page I created about ArenaCube as promotional. As I stated in the relevant talk page, this happened because the info where gathered either by press releases and the company's website. However, I made several changes in the content. Let me know if it is OK now or if you feel that further changes are required.

Many thanks in advance for your help, Dkalo (talk) 16:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

You're right, but

considering that 50% of stuff that is on wikipedia, is false and fictional and thanks to you I got a F on my assessment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lachlan1258 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Lachlan1258, the article was deleted because it was an Article about a subject obviously invented by article creator or associate, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. The article read like a story, a work of fiction, and that content is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like, we could place the content on one of your user pages so you could continue to work on it. But only encyclopedic subjects are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia that have demonstrated notability from reliable sources. This is not a platform for creative writing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Well

can you and this liz person please put it back up on my user page or whatever it is called so i can get a better mark. You just could of done that in the first place instead of DELETING IT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lachlan1258 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

And

tell that liz creep that how can a horror story be a personal story!?!?!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lachlan1258 (talk • contribs) 03:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

you are going about it the wrong way if you want Liz to help you!-Roxy the dog™ woof 12:02, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Can you please explain

how i 'attacked' you and that Liz creep. I believe i have done nothing wrong and if anything you and that Liz creep are blackmailing me. Please after this leave me alone and stop harassing a 14 year old — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lachlan1258 (talk • contribs) 03:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

P.S

who gives you the Authority to delete my PERSONAL stuff that my teacher told ME to do, NOT OTHER USER CREEPS to mess with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lachlan1258 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Please read the whole thing before editing. I say READ.

You Narutolovehinata5, stop tagging the topic Shikkhok.com as speedy deletion. This topic is completely new from the very first edit by me. The very first edit was copied content. This time I edited the whole page. SO please look before you adding Speedy Deletion. There were no speedy deletion content. You READ carefully first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themasudur (talk • contribs) 10:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Even with the promotional content remove, the article did not credibly state why the article should have an article on Wikipedia. Essentially, the article did not indicate "why should this have an article?" As it stands, the company is not remarkable enough to be included here per our notability guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga#RfC:_Anime_films_and_production_companies

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga#RfC:_Anime_films_and_production_companies. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Template:Z48

Article Deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Stopcook is an E-commerce website well familiar site in Chennai city, Considerable number of people are visiting this website everyday. Holding high reputation like food panda, justeat. I couldn't understand, how it would come under speedily deletion. ) --Vivekanand Selvaraj 12:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Basgann - Speedy Deletion

Hello, I hope everything goes well. I am trying to create a page for an online e-zine in Turkey which is Basgann.com and you tagged it for speedy deletion. Nevertheless, it is not a blog page, personal web-site etc. It is one of the newly developing media medium in Turkey which is e-zine like the printed men's magazines such as gq, esquire, boxer magazines. These popular printed mags are also have online e-zines in Turkey, too. (www.gq.com.tr; www.esquire.com.tr; boxerdergisi.tv) Also, these brands mentioned on wikipedia, too. Moreover, basgann in terms of daily page views, unique users etc. is bigger than these popular mags in Turkey. So, I need your help about this speedy deletion because it is unfair. Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unexploredmind (talk • contribs) 10:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

"As long as you remember her, you are not alone"

Hello ^_^ I love Puella Magi Madoka Magica. You say on your user page that the quote at the top of your page is your motto in life. May I ask what you mean by that? I mean, Madoka isn't real, and even if she were, you're not a magical girl ^_^; Grizel Cochrane (talk) 17:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

It's just a quote. Nothing wrong with that, right? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC

A motto is a statement of a principle you try to abide by in your life, isn't it? I'm just wondering how it applies to your life. I'm not trying to be argumentative, I'm just curious! Happy New Year! Grizel Cochrane (talk) 12:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Don't delete Left Wing Fascists there is a long history of music here

why would you want to delete my article? There is a new release by the band and history since 1987

The band may have been around for decades, but a search on Google failed to show sources which could establish notability; sources which discuss why the band is notable. The article did not credeibly indicate why its subject deserves a Wikipedia entry. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kisida Kyoudan & The Akebosi Rockets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Explain the Deleted Article?

Can you explain why you deleted the article on Impossible Ventures. You had flagged it before it was even finalized. - Nouhb (talk) 10:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes but the company appears to not have been covered in reliable sources, which in most cases is a requirement for establishing the notability required for a subject to have a Wikipedia article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Find something better to do than keep getting pages marked for deletion ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinips (talk • contribs) 17:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Re: Mami Kawada

I don't know much about real people articles but I would recommend archiving citations if you plan to take the article to FA. Still, I think it would pass GA in its current state. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC) @Tintor2: Actually, I was asking if you could review it for GA status (i.e. start the GAN). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry but I also don't have experience with real people articles and I could a bit bias. I would recommend you to at least seek help in the project other GANs even if it's your first time. Try searching for a small article first to reduce the pressure. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 02:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I see. I see that Cirt hasn't been active for about two months now, so Karas (anime)'s GAN is currently on hold. Will take a look at it in a moment and will try leave feedback there. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mami Kawada

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mami Kawada you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 01:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mami Kawada

The article Mami Kawada you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mami Kawada for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mami Kawada

The article Mami Kawada you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mami Kawada for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 02:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations in making the article pasa gan. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Thanks for the message. I've nominated it for DYK too and it's passed, so if all goes well, the hook should go up on February 13 (her birthday). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Anonymous;Code for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anonymous;Code is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anonymous;Code until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 14:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Swpb. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Carola Pavlik, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. —swpb^T 14:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

buypaa

article about "BUYPAA" was deleted & i wud like to improve it further and also i gave the reason about why it should not deleted..

DYK for Mami Kawada

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Yay! Congrats on the GA and DYK! :) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: Thanks for the message. It's a shame I had to work on her article as she's about to retire, but I guess at least she can retire with her having a pretty good Wikipedia entry. The effort I put into the article actually amazes me considering how the article looked like this when I started working on it. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

The good thing about retirement is that the article isn't having to constantly update for new material and having to scrub a pile of gossip and cruft. But yeah, it's quite satisfying to bring such articles to a well-written encyclopedic state. The version back then wasn't too bad for content, but now it's sourced and readers should get a better idea of what she's about instead of just being yet another Japanese anime singer. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: Here's a fun fact: my original plan was that I wouldn't actually nominate her article for GA status until today. I was planning to nominate the article today (February 13, which happens to be her birthday). I wanted the GAN to be kind of like a birthday gift for her. However, her announcement of her retirement made me change those plans, so I decided to nominate her for GAN status earlier than anticipated. When it passed, I thought it would be a good idea for her article to be a DYK hook, and when it passed the DYK nomination, I requested that the hook go up today, her birthday. So I guess her being a DYK today is my birthday gift to her. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you!

I appreciate you cleaning up after my mess. Thank goodness for new-page patrollers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie Sanders (talk • contribs) 03:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Deleted Article

Sir, why did you delete my article without a warning or any permission?!

UR LIKE WORSE THAN JANSEN HOWANG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoizh (talk • contribs) 01:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Teen angst

I wasn't trying to be promotional. Is it because I offered solutions to the problem instead of just stating the problem. What could I change to make this page more successful. i was really just trying to make a page so I could have some edits under my belt. I think teen angst is a real thing that warrants its own page, and I have no relation to any of the sources used, except the link which is just a picture of someone I think perfectly embodies teen angst. I had to use that link because I wasn't allowed to upload a picture until I have ten edits already. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to keep this page up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Achenbam (talk • contribs) 04:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Echoes from the past

Hey Narutolovehinata5. You may be interested in the new reply to an old question of yours at WP:Reference desk/Archives/Entertainment/2010 June 26#old anime?. Cheers! -- ToE 23:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Glitter Force move review

There is a move review at Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2016_February#Glitter_Force that you might want to look at. It's about moving "Smile Precure"/"Smile Pretty Cure!" to "Glitter Force". --Joseph123454321 (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA Nomination for Fitso

Hi, I am sorry that I published the article whereas I meant it to go in drafts. I couldn't find the option for drafting it. My bad. Request you to move it to drafts if possible. Sajelsaxena (talk) 10:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Quick speedy tagging of new articles

I just want to let you know that I moved an article that you recently tagged A7 into draft space, Draft:PetCloud. It was live for less then 60 seconds before you tagged it and the person came into the IRC help channel asking why it was tagged and that they were in the process of adding references. Perhaps in the future you can wait at least 10 or 15 minutes before tagging things for deletion unless they are blatant copyvios, attack articles, or vandalism? Article creation is hard and tagging the first article of a new contributor that quickly can be a big shock and a little bitey to someone that is trying. Thanks. --Majora (talk) 01:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

As someone who himself has experienced articles being nominated for deletion shortly after creation (see messages posted on my talkpage above), I understand the feeling. The problem is that it seems the article failed criterion A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, as the article did not credibly state why the article is important (not necessarily notable) enough to have a Wikipedia article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Serious? I'm so sorry, I didn't realise it would be that serious. I'm new here, and don't understand the rules completely PLEASE don't block me Gigantopithecusman (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)