User talk:McGeddon: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
Sorry about disturbing you, but it is obvious that that picture is not my work, I just thought it would be a good edition to the page, and in what other ways can I insert images? [[User:Gigantopithecusman|Gigantopithecusman]] ([[User talk:Gigantopithecusman|talk]]) 19:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC) |
Sorry about disturbing you, but it is obvious that that picture is not my work, I just thought it would be a good edition to the page, and in what other ways can I insert images? [[User:Gigantopithecusman|Gigantopithecusman]] ([[User talk:Gigantopithecusman|talk]]) 19:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
Thank you for your help [[User:Gigantopithecusman|Gigantopithecusman]] ([[User talk:Gigantopithecusman|talk]]) 19:41, 11 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:41, 11 March 2016
This is McGeddon's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
You have the source
The source is authors William Strauss and Neil Howe (Check under Terminology): Wrote several books on the subject of generations and are widely credited with coining the term Millennials.[1] Howe has said "No one knows who will name the next generation after the Millennials".[1] In 2005, their company sponsored an online contest in which respondents voted overwhelmingly for the name Homeland Generation. That was not long after the September 11th terrorist attacks, and one fallout of the disaster was that Americans may have felt more safe staying at home.[2] Howe has described himself as "not totally wed" to the name and cautioned that "names are being invented by people who have a great press release. Everyone is looking for a hook."[1] Howe defines the Homeland Generation as people born from approximately 2005 to 2025.
No person born in the 90's is part of Generation Z. These guys did the intensive research for years as historians vs others who just have a 'feeling' that people born in the 90's belong to a different generation off of the eye test and vague research. A generation on average last 20 to 25 years from the birth of the individual to the birth of a child. So if Millennials birth range is from 1982 to 2004, then that obviously means that 2005 to 2025, give or take a couple of years, is the correct time frame of births for Generation Z. It's all about their place in history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.234.49.144 (talk) 17:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Make Wikipedia Great Again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Averageguy007 (talk • contribs) 12:28, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Help!
Thanks for you response about real-life room escape. Since the facts on the site are outdated and partially wrong. We put a lot of effort to gather all the right information to share it with others. I'd really like to update the article with the correct information, but without correct source is pointless. What can we do?
Speedy deletion nomination of Brooks Bombers
Hello McGeddon. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3), or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Brooks Bombers. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good fo Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.Template:Z149.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk • contribs) 00:33, 30 January 2016
Earth station
Hi, sir, as top level frequency management expert I would like to know for what reason you can NOT except a definition agreed upon in all ITU-language by 200 administrations, including US and UK. v.r. HHubi –
Revised Code Biology page (10 Feb 2016)
Notes for Reviewer McGeddon:
[1] The first objection was that Code Biology has originated by “Barbieri dismissing biosemiotics as unscientific and forming a splinter society”. In reality the polemics with Biosemiotics was only a secondary accident and for this reason it has been removed from the last revised version.
[2] The second objection was directed to find out the secondary sources in Code Biology, and the answer is that they are of three kinds: (1) the 12 members of the Code Biology Society (see their websites in External links), (2) the participants in the Code Biology Conferences (see the conference photogalleries in External links); and (3) all those who have published articles on the organic codes that appeared after the genetic code and before the codes of culture (see their papers in References).
Yours faithfully Marcello Barbieri Marcello Barbieri (talk) 18:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Question
how do i reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudyboxing (talk • contribs) 14:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
Hope this gives you a bit of a push for new writing! ♥ Cherry <33 x XxLolliexX (talk) 09:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC) |
Thanks....
....but this passive/agressive barnstar made me chuckle. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 09:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Revert to Movember
unrelated charity event according to source, misleading to describe as an "extension" [1]
It was promoted as an 'extension' - from November into December - with a substantial cable/satellite coverage, which may have arguably been advertising rhetoric. No intention to mislead, no spam, no promotion - are you agreeable to the general elements of deleted content going into Movember#Similar events? If so, please paste it in to your satisfaction. Thank you.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 13:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Instaprint
Hi McGeddon, I'm new to Wikipedia and want to make sure I'm not getting flagged for anything or for linking back to my page. Also, I have permission to use the image on the page. Can you please advise me? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Socialsister (talk • contribs) 18:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, can you please advise me if I want to write an article about Hashtag Printing and link it to my article about Instaprint? Is this ok? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Socialsister (talk • contribs) 13:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
My sandbox
Hi, can you check my sandbox before develop Paper soccer article? Dawid2009 (talk) 20:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Noah Miller (businessman)
Hi McGeddon,
I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Noah Miller (businessman). I've changed this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buhram (talk • contribs) 20:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Yo dude
I dont need a sorce the only source I need is God he has told me it is right I am his messenger Hebrews 5:9 Itsnotconectthedotscasey (talk) 20:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) (Addressing on user's talk page). Ian.thomson (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Invitation
Hello, McGeddon.
You are invited to join WikiProject Food and drink, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of food, drink and cuisine topics. |
Panicum effusum has been nominated for Did You Know
Hello, McGeddon. Panicum effusum, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 04:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC) |
Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences/KISS Foundation
Hi McGeddon. Could you take a look at my comments at Talk:Kalinga Institute Of Social Sciences (formerly KISS Foundation)? Any thoughts? I'm going to ask an administrator to move this to Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences over the current redirect, unless there are serious objections. Voceditenore (talk) 09:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Panicum effusum
On 27 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Panicum effusum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that earlier this month, the town of Wangaratta was overrun by hairy panic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Panicum effusum. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Slanderous remark
Please withdraw the slanderous remark you made on the Cliff Richard talk page. I am a unique user and I have not been posting under aliases. That is a slanderous slur and unacceptable. Your apology needs to be posted immediately and the comment withdrawn. I shall escalate if it is not done so.72.245.246.219 (talk) 23:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- 72.245.246.219, please see the duck test. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
no need
i not need your welcome temple do your own work thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ψιδο μρ.χ (talk • contribs) 16:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Filth City
When you put a PROD tag on an article, like you did at Filth City, please make sure the article is patrolled as well. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Something something perpetual motion
Then your a traitor who supports human exploitation and economic slavery, and this conversation is over, since you are not a reasonable human being, but rather a dulled down hypocritical slave.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Noscam (talk • contribs) 16:18, 3 March 2016
Copyright violations
Thank you for letting me knowGigantopithecusman (talk) 13:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Overhasty speedy deletion
Hi, for Rivane Neuenschwander you tagged it with A3 only 7 minutes after creation. Please give the writers a bit more time, an hour is an appropriate amount of time. The same applies to A1, A7 and A10 speedy delete reasons. In this case the author added content a couple of minutes later, still not enough, but is it no longer blank. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:07, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Ouch my toes are burining
Please do a Google search for the term. If you find any source, even a blog, that talks about a drink like that, then do go ahead and undo my CSD. Otherwise, it seems common sense that the creator of the article has invented the term themselves. Thanks. Xender Lourdes (talk) 18:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- And yes, "burining" (with the spelling error) is actually how the author named the article. Xender Lourdes (talk) 19:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Your sense of humour
I like your sense of humour :-) This is apart from my thanks to you for the patient effort you (and JohnCD) have taken to explain the nuances in the A11. Had a request to you. Can you please change the heading of the talk section you've written on my talk page? "Burining the newcomers" is not what I feel should be the import of our discussions. I shall be quite thankful if you can do that. Thanks. Xender Lourdes (talk) 04:02, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- :-) I actually wanted to remove the line Burining the newcomers (it is embarrassing for me and far from what was intended). As you've again written the same statement in your latest reply, so I wanted to request you to allow me remove that too (i've substituted that for now, if you're okay with it). Thank you for understanding but more than that thank you for the nice and humorous way you describe things. Xender Lourdes (talk) 02:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Stop
Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. I added a sentence and a reliable source that supports my edit. Quit trying to own the article. Kindzmarauli (talk)
Page on Randolph Stone
Hello McGeddon, yesterday I have put on an article on Randolph Stone. When you suggested it to be deleted I learned that an article on Stone has been deleted in 2012. I don't know who wrote it and have never seen it. In the meantime I have worked on rendering the stile of the article neutral, dropping a few details and providing more references including secondary sources as required. It is my first article I have put on Wikipedia. How are its chances now? Regards, Polaritytherapie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polaritytherapie (talk • contribs) 11:46, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Wrestling Socks
I am not sure how to approach persistent soaks but you managed quite well the last time. Please take a look at User:Japonesede123. I could put the speedy tags on myself but I think an SPI must be started (or added on) and I am not sure how that works.Peter Rehse (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Own work
I did not claim it as my own work, even though it said it there, and how am I supposed to do It without that?Gigantopithecusman (talk) 18:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Sorry about disturbing you, but it is obvious that that picture is not my work, I just thought it would be a good edition to the page, and in what other ways can I insert images? Gigantopithecusman (talk) 19:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your help Gigantopithecusman (talk) 19:41, 11 March 2016 (UTC)