Jump to content

Talk:William Lofland Dudley: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
{{WikiProject United States|class=B|KY=yes|KY-importance=}}
{{WikiProject United States|class=B|KY=yes|KY-importance=}}
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Miniapolis|date=October 9, 2015}}
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Miniapolis|date=October 9, 2015}}
}}{{GA nominee|07:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:MisterCake|Cake]] ([[User talk:MisterCake|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Chemistry and materials science|status=|note=}}
}}


==Aurora Borealis==
==Aurora Borealis==

Revision as of 07:00, 20 March 2016

Aurora Borealis

Chemistry is likely my worst academic subject. From what I understand, Dudley was praised for explaining that the aurora borealis was neon gas, while today it's known not to be neon but work via the same process as a neon light, which is probably the point which Dudley got praise for elucidating. Please do clean this up if you can; to any interested, the man's scientific work leaves no shortage of material for the scientifically inclined. Cake (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]