Talk:William Lofland Dudley: Difference between revisions
MisterCake (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
MisterCake (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{WikiProject United States|class=B|KY=yes|KY-importance=}} |
{{WikiProject United States|class=B|KY=yes|KY-importance=}} |
||
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Miniapolis|date=October 9, 2015}} |
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Miniapolis|date=October 9, 2015}} |
||
}}{{GA nominee|07:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:MisterCake|Cake]] ([[User talk:MisterCake|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Chemistry and materials science|status=|note=}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Aurora Borealis== |
==Aurora Borealis== |
Revision as of 07:00, 20 March 2016
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
William Lofland Dudley is currently a Chemistry and materials science good article nominee. Nominated by Cake (talk) at 07:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
Aurora Borealis
Chemistry is likely my worst academic subject. From what I understand, Dudley was praised for explaining that the aurora borealis was neon gas, while today it's known not to be neon but work via the same process as a neon light, which is probably the point which Dudley got praise for elucidating. Please do clean this up if you can; to any interested, the man's scientific work leaves no shortage of material for the scientifically inclined. Cake (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- B-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class college football articles
- Low-importance college football articles
- WikiProject College football articles
- B-Class Chemistry articles
- Low-importance Chemistry articles
- WikiProject Chemistry articles
- B-Class Tennessee articles
- Unknown-importance Tennessee articles
- B-Class Vandy articles
- High-importance Vandy articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- B-Class Kentucky articles
- Unknown-importance Kentucky articles
- WikiProject Kentucky articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review