Talk:2012 phenomenon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:20, 22 March 2016

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2012 phenomenon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This discussion page is not the place to air your personal views on which or why momentous events/changes of consciousness/whatever things did or did not occur in December 2012. Wikipedia is not an internet discussion forum. Any such comments will be deleted. Please attempt to keep discussion on the topic of improving the article.

2012 phenomenon is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 20, 2012.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 20, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
November 2, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
January 29, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
September 22, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
October 23, 2010	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
April 3, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
May 27, 2011	Featured article candidate	Promoted
December 27, 2012	Articles for deletion	Speedily kept
Current status: Featured article

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

The following are formal Requested move discussions to rename the 2012 phenomenon article.

Move: "2012 Doomsday Prediction" → "December 21, 2012 Mayan Calendar theories": July 2009, Opposed (Discussion archive)
Move: "2012 doomsday prediction" → "2012 millenarianism": August 2009, Accepted (Discussion archive)
Move: "2012 millenarianism" → "2012 phenomenon", August 2009: Opposed (Discussion archive)
Move: "2012 millenarianism" → "2012 phenomenon", September 2009: Accepted (Discussion archive)
Move: "2012 phenomenon" → "2012 apocalypticism", June 2010: Opposed (Discussion archive)
Move: "2012 phenomenon" → "2012 (pseudoscience)", August 2010: Opposed (Discussion archive)
Move: "2012 phenomenon" → "2012 theory", October 2010: Opposed (Discussion archive)
Move: "2012 phenomenon" → "2012 end of world predictions", November 2011: Rescinded (Discussion archive)

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Alternative views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mesoamerica (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Paranormal Low‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Skepticism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Spirituality Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Spoken Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Shouldn't this be updated to past tense now that all the referenced dates have past? Much of the content still portrays this as something that could happen in the future.Practicality (talk) 21:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Practicality: It was mostly already past tense; though I went through the article and fixed a couple places that weren't. Is it better now? If not feel free to fix anything that still needs updating. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 18:29, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2012 phenomenon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2012 phenomenon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130526025419/http://telefenoticias.com.ar/es/news//20121217/cerrarian-uritorco-proximo-viernes-por-temor-suicidio-masivo/14489.shtml to http://telefenoticias.com.ar/es/news//20121217/cerrarian-uritorco-proximo-viernes-por-temor-suicidio-masivo/14489.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apocalypse

As I recall, Coe put the date as December 11, 2012. If this is correct, Coe's faulty calculation should be retained and noted, not elided out of the quotation from his work.156.98.252.252 (talk) 20:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC) Whoops! Looks like there is a note of some kind. Could go back and see what date Coe used in the edition I was reading a few days ago, but don't think it's worth the bother.156.98.252.252 (talk) 20:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:14, 22 March 2016 edit 156.98.252.252 (talk) →Apocalypse: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:20, 22 March 2016 edit undo 156.98.252.252 (talk) →Apocalypse Next edit →
Line 124:		Line 124:

	As I recall, Coe put the date as December 11, 2012. If this is correct, Coe's faulty calculation should be retained and noted, not elided out of the quotation from his work.[[Special:Contributions/156.98.252.252\|156.98.252.252]] ([[User talk:156.98.252.252\|talk]]) 20:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)		As I recall, Coe put the date as December 11, 2012. If this is correct, Coe's faulty calculation should be retained and noted, not elided out of the quotation from his work.[[Special:Contributions/156.98.252.252\|156.98.252.252]] ([[User talk:156.98.252.252\|talk]]) 20:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
			Whoops! Looks like there is a note of some kind. Could go back and see what date Coe used in the edition I was reading a few days ago, but don't think it's worth the bother.[[Special:Contributions/156.98.252.252\|156.98.252.252]] ([[User talk:156.98.252.252\|talk]]) 20:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)