Irregular moon: Difference between revisions
Eurocommuter (talk | contribs) +rotation |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[ |
In [[astronomy]], an '''irregular satellite''' is a [[natural satellite]] following a distant, inclined, often [[retrograde orbit]] and believed to be captured as opposed to a regular satellite, formed ''in situ''. |
||
[[Image:Phoebe_cassini.jpg|thumb|150px|right|[[Phoebe (moon)|Phoebe]], the largest irregular satellite of Saturn.]] |
[[Image:Phoebe_cassini.jpg|thumb|150px|right|[[Phoebe (moon)|Phoebe]], the largest irregular satellite of Saturn.]] |
||
Eighty-six irregular satellites have been discovered since 1997 orbiting all four [[giant planet]]s. Only a dozen were discovered earlier, including [[Phoebe (moon)|Phoebe]], the largest irregular satellite of Saturn, and [[Himalia (moon)|Himalia]], the largest irregular satellite of Jupiter. |
Eighty-six irregular satellites have been discovered since 1997 orbiting all four [[giant planet]]s. Only a dozen were discovered earlier, including [[Phoebe (moon)|Phoebe]], the largest irregular satellite of Saturn, and [[Himalia (moon)|Himalia]], the largest irregular satellite of Jupiter. |
Revision as of 17:03, 22 August 2006
In astronomy, an irregular satellite is a natural satellite following a distant, inclined, often retrograde orbit and believed to be captured as opposed to a regular satellite, formed in situ.
Eighty-six irregular satellites have been discovered since 1997 orbiting all four giant planets. Only a dozen were discovered earlier, including Phoebe, the largest irregular satellite of Saturn, and Himalia, the largest irregular satellite of Jupiter. It is thought that the irregular satellites were captured from heliocentric orbits, near their current locations, early after the planet formation. Their origin in Kuiper Belt space is not supported by the current observations.
Definition
planet | rH[Gm][1] |
---|---|
Jupiter | 51 |
Saturn | 69 |
Uranus | 73 |
Neptune | 116 |
There's no precise widely accepted definition of the irregular satellite. Informally, the satellites are considered irregular if they are far enough from the planet that the precession of their orbital plane is primarily controlled by the Sun.
Typically, the semi-major axis is compared with the Hill sphere (the gravitational influence sphere) .
Irregular satellites have semi-major axes greater than 0.05 and apoapsis up to 0.65 [1].
Orbits
Current distribution
The diagram illustrates the orbits of the irregular satellites of the giants planets discovered so far. The semi-major axes are expressed as a fraction of the planet’s Hill sphere’s radius and the inclination is represented on Y axis. The satellites above the X axis are prograde, the satellites beneath are retrograde.
Origin
The capture from a heliocentric orbit requires one of the following
- energy dissipation (e.g. in interaction with the primordial gas cloud)
- a substantial (40%) extension of the planet's Hill sphere in a brief period of time (thousands of years)
- a transfer of energy in a three-body interaction.
The last mechanism involving a collision (or a close encounter) of two satellites could result in one of them losing energy and be captured.
After the capture, some of the satellites could break-up leading to groupings of smaller moons following similar orbits. Resonances could further modify the orbits making the groupings less recognizable.
Long-term stability
Remarkably, the current orbits prove stable in numerical simulations, in spite of substantial perturbations near apocentre [2]. A number of irregulars are proven to be in secular or Kozai resonance believed to be the cause of this stability[3]. In addition, the simulations indicate that
- orbits with inclinations higher than 50° (130° for retrograde orbits) are not stable, their eccentricity growing quickly resulting in the satellite being lost
- retrograde orbits are more stable than prograde (stable retrograde orbits can be found further from the planet)
Physical characteristics
Size
Given the varying distances from Earth, the known population of the irregulars of Uranus and Neptune are understandably poorer than that of Jupiter and Saturn. With this observational bias in mind, the size distribution is similar for all four giant planets.
Typically, the relation expressing the number of objects of the diameter smaller or equal to is approximated by a power law: with q defining the slope.
Shallow power law (q~2) is observed for sizes 10 - 100km 1 but steeper (q~3.5) for objects smaller than 10km2 .
For comparison, the distribution of Kuiper Belt objects is much steeper (q~4) i.e. for one object of 1000km there’s 1000 objects with diameter of 100km. The size distribution provides insights into the posiible origin (capture, collision/break-up or accretion)
1For every object of 100km, ten objects of 10km can be found 2For one object 10km, ca 140 objects of 1km can be found
Colours
Observed colours vary from neutral to reddish but not as red as the colours of some Kuiper Belt objects (KBO).
albedo[4] | neutral | reddish | red |
---|---|---|---|
low | C 3-8% | P 2-6% | D 2-5% |
medium | M 10-18% | A13-35% | |
high | E 25-60% |
Each planet's system displays slightly different characteristics. Jupiter's irregulars are grey to slightly red, consistent with C, P and D-type asteroids [5]. Groupings with similar colours can be identified (see later sections). Saturn's irregulars are slightly redder than that of Jupiter. The very red colours typical for classical KBOs are rare among the irregulars.
Colour indices are simple measures of differences of the apparent magnitude of an object through blue (B), visible (V) i.e. green-yellow and red (R) filters. The diagram illustrates these differences (in slightly enhanced colour) for the irregulars with known colour indices. For reference, the Centaur Pholus and three classical Kuiper Belt objects are plotted (grey labels, size not to scale). For comparison, see colours of centaurs and KBOs.
Spectra
With the current resolution, the visible and near-infrared spectra of most satellites appear featureless. So far, water ice has been inferred on Phoebe and Nereid and features attributed to aqueous alteration were found on Himalia.
Rotation
Typically, the rotation of the regular moons is synchronous with their orbital rotation (tidal locking). For the irregular satellites, given the distance from the planet, the tidal forces are negligible and rotation periods in the range of 10 hours have been measured for the biggest moons Himalia, Phoebe and Nereid (to compare with their orbital periods of hundreds of days).
Families with a common origin
Given very similar orbital parameters of some satellites, a possible common origin has been investigated.
Dynamic groupings
Simple collision models can be used to estimate the possible dispersion of the orbital parameters given a velocity impulse δV. Applying these models to the known orbital parameters makes possible to estimate the δV necessary to create the observed dispersion. It is believed that δV of tens of meters per seconds (5-50m/s) could result from a break-up. Dynamical groupings of irregular satellites can be identified using these criteria and the likelihood of the common origin from a break-up evaluated.[6]
When the dispersion of the orbits is too wide (i.e. it would require δV in the order of hundreds of m/s)
- either more than one collision must be assumed, i.e. the cluster should be further subdivided into groups
- or significant post-collision changes, for example resulting from resonances, must be postulated.
Colour groupings
When the colours and spectra of the satellites are known, the homogeneity of these data for all the members of a given grouping is a substantial argument for the common origin. However, the precision of the available data makes often difficult to draw statistically significant conclusions. In addition, the observed colours are not necessarily representative for the bulk composition of the satellite.
Observed groupings
Irregular satellites of Jupiter
Typically, the following groupings are listed (dynamically tight groups displaying homogenous colours are listed in bold)
- Prograde satellites
- Himalia group (inclination 28° cluster): confined dynamically (δV~150m/s); very homogenous n visible (neutral colours similar to C-type asteroids) and near infrared spectrum[7].
- Themisto (isolated so far)
- Carpo (isolated so far)
- Retrograde satellites
- Carme group (165° cluster): dynamically tight (5<δV<50m/s) and very homogenous, displaying light-red colours consistent with a D-type progenitor
- Ananke group (148° cluster): little dispersion of orbital parameters (15<δV<80m/s); Ananke itself appears light-red while the satellites following similar orbits are grey
- Pasiphae group: dispersed; Pasiphae appears to be grey while other members are light-red 1.
1Sinope, sometimes included into Pasiphae group, is thought to be independent, trapped in a secular resonance with Pasiphae
Irregular satellites of Saturn
Typically, the following groupings are listed
- Prograde satellites
- Gallic group (inclination 34° cluster): tight dynamically (δV~50m/s), homogenous in both visible (light-red colours) and near IR[7]
- Inuit group (34° cluster): dispersed (δV~350 m/s) but physically homogenous (light-red colours)
- Retrograde satellites
- Norse group is defined mostly for naming purposes; the orbital parameter’s dispersion is large and different sub-divisions have been investigated, including
Irregulars of Uranus and Neptune
planet | rmin[km][1] |
---|---|
Jupiter | 1.5 |
Saturn | 3 |
Uranus | 7 |
Neptune | 16 |
It is believed that the relatively poorer (known) populations of the irregulars of Uranus and Neptune are due to the varying observational limits (the table on the left; the albedo of 0.04 is assumed). Statistically significant conclusions about the groupings are difficult. Single origin for the retrograde irregulars of Uranus seems unlikely given the dispersion of the orbital parameters that would require high impulse (~300 km) implying a large diameter of the impactor (395km), incompatible in turn with the size distribution of the fragments. Instead, the existence of two groupings is speculated [5]
The two groups have been found distinct (with 3σ confidence) in axis/eccentricity space[8].
For Neptune, a possible common origin of Psamathe and S/2002 N4 was noted [9].
References
- ^ a b c Scott S. Sheppard Outer irregular satellites of the planets and their relationship with asteroids, comets and Kuiper Belt objects Asteroids, Comets, Meteors, Proceedings of the 229th Symposium of the International Astronomical Union held in Búzios, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil August 7-12, 2005, Edited by Daniela, L.; Sylvio Ferraz, M.; Angel, F. Julio Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006., pp.319-334. Preprint.
- ^ David Nesvorný, Jose L. A. Alvarellos, Luke Dones, and Harold F. Levison Orbital and Collisional Evolution of the Irregular Satellites, The Astronomical Journal,126 (2003), pages 398–429. [1]
- ^ Cuk, M.; Burns, J. A. A New Model for the Secular Behavior of the Irregular Satellites, American Astronomical Society, DDA meeting #35, #09.03; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 36, p.864Preprint
- ^ Based on the definitions from Oxford Dictionary of Astronomy, ISBN 0-19-211596-0
- ^ a b Grav, Tommy; Holman, Matthew J.; Gladman, Brett J.; Aksnes, Kaare Photometric survey of the irregular satellites,Icarus, 166,(2003), pp. 33-45. Preprint
- ^ David Nesvorný, Cristian Beaugé, and Luke Dones Collisional Origin of Families of Irregular Satellites, The Astronomical Journal, 127 (2004), pp. 1768–1783 Full text.
- ^ a b Tommy Grav and Matthew J. Holman Near-Infrared Photometry of the Irregular Satellites of Jupiter and Saturn,The Astrophysical Journal, 605, (2004), pp. L141–L144 Preprint
- ^ Scott S. Sheppard, David C. Jewitt, and Jan Kleyna An Ultradeep Survey for Irregular Satellites of Uranus: Limits to Completeness, The Astronomical Journal, 129 (2005), pages 518–525 . Preprint
- ^ Scott S. Sheppard, David C. Jewitt, Jan Kleyna A Survey for "Normal" Irregular Satellites Around Neptune: Limits to Completeness Preprint