Wikipedia:WikiProject Animal rights: Difference between revisions
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs) →Aims: added yet another source to keep Nrets happy |
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs) moved aims to the top |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{alib}} |
{{alib}} |
||
⚫ | The aim of '''WikiProject Animal rights''' is to educate readers and editors about the concept of [[animal rights]], the [[animal liberation movement]], and its main concerns. The word "educate" is vital. We aim to provide intelligent, nuanced, three-dimensional coverage of the topic, not propaganda or simplistic knee-jerk responses, whether for or against. |
||
Some [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]s have formed a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|project]] to better organize information in articles related to '''Animal rights'''. This page and its subpages contain their suggestions; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians. If you would like to help, please inquire on the [[{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]]. |
|||
⚫ | Animal rights is no longer an issue that's confined to the fringes. The idea of extending legal [[personhood]] to animals is supported by an increasing number of legal scholars, including [[Alan Dershowitz]] [http://www.aldf.org/advocate/AnimalsAdvocatewinter02.pdf#search=%22%2Bdershowitz%20%2B%22animal%20rights%22%22] {{PDFlink}} and [[Laurence Tribe]] of [[Harvard Law School]]. [http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/oct03/animalrights.htm] At the time of writing, 39 out of 180 United States law schools teach specialist animal rights courses. The Swiss and German constitutions have been changed to reflect the status of animals as beings in their own right, rather than property. There is increasing support among academics for the idea of awarding very basic rights to other members of the [[Great Ape]] family. |
||
⚫ | This is therefore an interesting time to be exploring the issue. It's an exciting period for supporters of the movement, because legal breakthroughs may be on the horizon. It's challenging for those who rely on the use of animals in research or in industry. Philosophically, we may be on the brink of an intellectual revolution in which the status of human beings as the only possessors of souls, or as sitting at the moral pinnacle of the natural world, faces serious challenge for the first time in recorded history. |
||
⚫ | |||
If you would like to help, please inquire on the [[{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]]. |
|||
==Title== |
==Title== |
||
Line 6: | Line 14: | ||
{{user wpar}} |
{{user wpar}} |
||
<br><br> |
<br><br> |
||
==Scope== |
==Scope== |
||
The |
The project encompasses issues related to [[animal rights]] and the [[animal liberation movement]]. Specifically: |
||
#animal rights/animal liberation '''groups''' e.g. [[British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection]] |
#animal rights/animal liberation '''groups''' e.g. [[British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection]] |
||
Line 18: | Line 27: | ||
#individual animal rights/animal liberation activists |
#individual animal rights/animal liberation activists |
||
#lawyers, writers, and academics who work on animal rights/animal liberation theory |
#lawyers, writers, and academics who work on animal rights/animal liberation theory |
||
==Aims== |
|||
⚫ | The aim of |
||
⚫ | Animal rights is no longer an issue that's confined to the fringes. The idea of extending legal [[personhood]] to animals is supported by an increasing number of legal scholars, including [[Alan Dershowitz]] [http://www.aldf.org/advocate/AnimalsAdvocatewinter02.pdf#search=%22%2Bdershowitz%20%2B%22animal%20rights%22%22] {{PDFlink}} and [[Laurence Tribe]] of [[Harvard Law School]]. [http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/oct03/animalrights.htm] At the time of writing, 39 out of 180 United States law schools teach specialist animal rights courses. The Swiss and German constitutions have been changed to reflect the status of animals as beings in their own right, rather than property. There is increasing support among academics for the idea of awarding very basic rights to other members of the [[Great Ape]] family. |
||
⚫ | This is therefore an |
||
⚫ | |||
==General strategy and discussion forums== |
==General strategy and discussion forums== |
Revision as of 17:23, 22 August 2006
Template:Alib The aim of WikiProject Animal rights is to educate readers and editors about the concept of animal rights, the animal liberation movement, and its main concerns. The word "educate" is vital. We aim to provide intelligent, nuanced, three-dimensional coverage of the topic, not propaganda or simplistic knee-jerk responses, whether for or against.
Animal rights is no longer an issue that's confined to the fringes. The idea of extending legal personhood to animals is supported by an increasing number of legal scholars, including Alan Dershowitz [1] Template:PDFlink and Laurence Tribe of Harvard Law School. [2] At the time of writing, 39 out of 180 United States law schools teach specialist animal rights courses. The Swiss and German constitutions have been changed to reflect the status of animals as beings in their own right, rather than property. There is increasing support among academics for the idea of awarding very basic rights to other members of the Great Ape family.
This is therefore an interesting time to be exploring the issue. It's an exciting period for supporters of the movement, because legal breakthroughs may be on the horizon. It's challenging for those who rely on the use of animals in research or in industry. Philosophically, we may be on the brink of an intellectual revolution in which the status of human beings as the only possessors of souls, or as sitting at the moral pinnacle of the natural world, faces serious challenge for the first time in recorded history.
For all these reasons, animal rights is an issue that provokes strong feelings. The aim of this project is to ensure that Wikipedia's coverage is not informed by those strong feelings, but by disinterested, intelligent, neutral, and reliable research.
If you would like to help, please inquire on the talk page.
Title
WikiProject on Animal rights
This user participates in WikiProject Animal rights. |
Scope
The project encompasses issues related to animal rights and the animal liberation movement. Specifically:
- animal rights/animal liberation groups e.g. British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection
- animal rights campaigns e.g. SPEAK
- leaderless resistance movements e.g. Animal Liberation Front
- issues related to speciesism, philosophy of animal rights, ethical theories
- animals rights in law
- studies into animal intelligence that may have a bearing on arguments about animal rights
- areas of concern to the animal rights movement, such as factory farming and animal testing
- individual animal rights/animal liberation activists
- lawyers, writers, and academics who work on animal rights/animal liberation theory
General strategy and discussion forums
Category
The category contains articles about the movement, its ideas and philosophy, individual activists, writers, and issues of interest to them.
Participants
Projects
Tasks
Other subpages
Templates
This user participates in WikiProject Animal rights. |
- To add the template above to your user page, write {{user wpar}}.
- To add Template:Animal liberation to an article, write {{Alib}}, and it will produce the template you see at the top of this page.
- Regarding the topics the template should include, these should ideally be the most pertinent and notable AR activists, topics, campaigns, and writers.
Stub templates
Stubs are managed by the Stub-sorting WikiProject. Before creating a new stub, you should propose it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals. See Wikipedia:Stub for general guidelines on proposing stub templates and categories. Do not simply create new stub templates, as they may be deleted.
Articles
Please feel free to list your new projectname-related articles here (newer articles at the top, please). Any new articles that have an interesting or unusual fact in them should be suggested for the Did you know? box on the Main Wikipedia page. DYN has a 72 hr. time limit from the creation of the article.