Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Industrial Style: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Dennis Brown (talk | contribs) →Industrial Style: add |
wait to move |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Keep''' {{u|Ihaveacatonmydesk}}, {{u|Mduvekot}} and {{u|Dennis Brown}} please have another look. I have edited the article to remove original research and add references. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' {{u|Ihaveacatonmydesk}}, {{u|Mduvekot}} and {{u|Dennis Brown}} please have another look. I have edited the article to remove original research and add references. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
:*I'm ok with that, although I'm not sure that "Style" should be capitalized. It isn't perfect, but it gets it down to the bare bones of what the topic is supposed to cover, and at first glance, has sources. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2¢</b>]] 16:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC) |
:*I'm ok with that, although I'm not sure that "Style" should be capitalized. It isn't perfect, but it gets it down to the bare bones of what the topic is supposed to cover, and at first glance, has sources. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2¢</b>]] 16:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
:::It is not a [[proper noun]] so ''Style'' should not be capitalized.It might create a mess to move it while AfD is in progress so I'll wait. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 16:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:57, 28 March 2016
- Industrial Style (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research, see talk page for more info. Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 23:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - This has been around most of a decade without improvement since 2007 other than categories. Having no article is better than an article that consists of nothing except original research. The topic exists and is likely notable, but the only way to make the article compliant with policy is to nuke it and wait for someone interested in doing it right. In short, nuke it and let someone start over if they want. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete If there is such a thing as "Industrial Style", it would be in interior design, where polished concrete floors and exposed brickwork feature prominently in open concepts. See for example this article from the WSJ. The examples given in the current revision describe a style of automotive design for which, as far as I can tell, no sources exist. Mduvekot (talk) 19:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Ihaveacatonmydesk, Mduvekot and Dennis Brown please have another look. I have edited the article to remove original research and add references. ~Kvng (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm ok with that, although I'm not sure that "Style" should be capitalized. It isn't perfect, but it gets it down to the bare bones of what the topic is supposed to cover, and at first glance, has sources. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 16:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- It is not a proper noun so Style should not be capitalized.It might create a mess to move it while AfD is in progress so I'll wait. ~Kvng (talk) 16:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)