Jump to content

Talk:Corydalis: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
To do: new section
WikiProject assessment
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Plants|class=Stub|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Plants|class=stub|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject China|class=stub}}
==Florida and the Gulf Coast==
==Florida and the Gulf Coast==
It would help readers if the article identified the specific climatic features of those areas that affect the plant's growth. [[User:Doctor Whom|Doctor Whom]] 20:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
It would help readers if the article identified the specific climatic features of those areas that affect the plant's growth. [[User:Doctor Whom|Doctor Whom]] 20:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:53, 4 April 2016

WikiProject iconPlants Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Florida and the Gulf Coast

It would help readers if the article identified the specific climatic features of those areas that affect the plant's growth. Doctor Whom 20:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I will ask the guy who wrote that section. By the way, this is not an article only about Corydalis lutea, which is moreover an older, invalid name (symonym) of Pseudofumaria lutea. I think most of this article should be moved to Pseudofumaria lutea. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aelwyn (talkcontribs) 15:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

To do

Looked through the species under the Corydalis category on Wikimedia Commons, found the photos that were clear enough to serve as thumbnails, and added them to the article. There are a ton of photos, so it would be nice to classify the species under sections. — Eru·tuon 05:04, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]