Jump to content

User talk:Pastorma: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
OK: new section
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by モハメッド一二三 - "OK: new section"
Line 67: Line 67:
== OK ==
== OK ==


But I can't link the English page, I'm having problems. I deleted the page tho, I will find a way [to link it to the English article].
But I can't link the English page, I'm having problems. I deleted the page tho, I will find a way [to link it to the English article]. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:モハメッド一二三|モハメッド一二三]] ([[User talk:モハメッド一二三|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/モハメッド一二三|contribs]]) 23:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 23:55, 7 April 2016


Recent edit to Roblox

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Roblox, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roblox

Hi.

Are you sure you know what you are reverting?

And remember, edit summary for reverting is mandatory unless you revert vandalism. Failing to provide one might lead to the loss of your editing privileges.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BLOX City requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 01:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BLOX City for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BLOX City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BLOX City until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 22:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why make a speedy deletion claim

No
Why did you make a speedy deletion claim for the article on the glimpson. The article was made by the CREATOR of the glimpson, therefore it cannot harm him in any way and was not made to make fun of the creator. Ericglimpson23 (talk) 19:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NPP

Hi.We appreciate your enthusiasm but with only just over 100 edits to mainspace and your own creations being deleted, you do not have anywhere near enough experience to be patrolling and tagging other articles. If you insist on doing maintenance tasks, you may wish to consider a much easier task such as helping to combat vandalism, but even to do that you will need 200 edits to mainspace to enroll at the WP:CVUA to learn all about it. Happy editing ! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Roblox assualt team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 10:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Learning in Intelligent Information Retrieval requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 10:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SHEP (company)

The article SHEP (company) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laber□T 21:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

日本人知らない日本語page

The page is needed so people from the Japanese wikipedia page can access the English page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by モハメッド一二三 (talkcontribs) 23:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK

But I can't link the English page, I'm having problems. I deleted the page tho, I will find a way [to link it to the English article]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by モハメッド一二三 (talkcontribs) 23:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]