Jump to content

User talk:MatthewVanitas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:MatthewVanitas/Archive 47) (bot
Line 175: Line 175:


Hi Matthew. Why do I keep getting a resubmit button when I check my sandbox? I can't tell if it's being rejected again after my edits supporting notability or if it is for some other reason. Thanks.
Hi Matthew. Why do I keep getting a resubmit button when I check my sandbox? I can't tell if it's being rejected again after my edits supporting notability or if it is for some other reason. Thanks.

== Article IBM System/360 Model 25 renamed to 360 Model 25 ==

Matthew,

On March 18th, you moved my draft article "IBM System/360 Model 25" to "360 Model 25". Can you please explain what was the reason?
The existing articles about other /360 models are all titled "IBM System/360 Model nn" (check the articles for models 30, 44, 50, and 67), so I think this should be kept as "IBM System/360 Model 25" for consistency.
Thanks,
[[User:Gmacedoj|Gmacedoj]] ([[User talk:Gmacedoj|talk]]) 13:04, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:04, 9 April 2016

Rgenhofer (talk) 14:52, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Archive box collapsible

Help on an article

Hey there. I see you have declined my article. I am new to wikipedia and I just referenced the other articles and submitted mine. I would be thankful if you could just help me out on how to improve my article. Draft: Umer Jubapu. He is the only person in Bhatkal who is a singer and a dancer together and he is very famous for his talent specially around the middle east. Please help me out. Thank you.

User:Alekborodina

11:04:12, 28 October 2015 review of submission by Imtiaz772

Matthew, I come to you for assistance because you seem incredibly knowledgeable and like to help other people who contribute. I have created a page John M. Dougan that was nominated for deletion. The person who nominated refuses to provide clarification on why, other than saying there appears to be a conflict of interest. Of course, there is none. I write about subjects that interest me and this is one of the subjects that interest me. He also claims the sources aren't good enough. I am using some of the largest newspapers in the country! I don't get it and I am just looking to make this article better. I know it may not be your area, but Wikipedia is created by people with interests in certain topics. I grew up in Russia and love people that fight against the government, so this man is very interesting to me. I beg you to check out the page and the talk page and give me guidance since this other person who is marking my items for deletion refuses to do so. I thank you VERY much in advance and please contact me at a_borodina@outlook.com for your convenience. You are great!

Aleksandra Borodina

11:04:12, 28 October 2015 review of submission by Imtiaz772


Dear Matthew Thank you for your review and response

based on your comment , I have two points to clarify

Point no 1: you have suggested to get references from neutral party

my response: In the reference section I have highlighted Khaleej times( News paper of UAE) carrying out an article and covering him as a speaker addressing a gathering of participants, the scanned copies of these originals are available with me and I can forward to your mail if you need them, these are three in number on the date I have mentioned. Khaleej times does not have a weblink of these as these are old and have shared with me the scanned original page

Point no 2: Zuhoori name

in these references of above it is titled as shihabdeen as per his original name, you will not find zuhoori, if this is seen as an issue then I can edit the title of his page as per his original name hypen Madhanisha zuhoori

Please let me know if you need any thing else

Reg Imtiaz

10:28:06, 4 November 2015 review of submission by Imtiaz772


Hi Matthew, I have provided the needed info, should I resubmit the article?

05:02:52, 6 November 2015 review of submission by 202.83.32.135


The film is an important one in the Malayalam independent films. It has been already selected to Mumbai Academy of the Moving Image MAMI 2015, International Film Festival of Kerala IFFK 2015 It has got a rare review in The Hollywood Reporter, It is the second film of the director who was awarded Kerala State Film Award for Best Director in Kerala State Film Award.

thank you

Sorry for Disturbing you again i readed your message and i hope i can , Re Edit it

thanking you after editing i'll inform you and if yo have a free time you can check it out thank you again for your interest

16:39:26, 5 January 2016 review of submission by Writingasaghost


Thank you so much for your recommendations for improvement. I have done my best to incorporate them and resubmitted.

Article on "Jackson Pyrotechnic Explosion (Chester, PA)"

Hello Mr. Vanitas,

Thank you for taking your time to comment on my proposed article. I have added an additional reference and I have also added to the article that this disaster was the impetus to establish the first hospital in Chester, Pennsylvania. I am now citing 3 references: newspaper articles from 1882, 1912 and 1963.

I appreciate your comments and your help. Having just retired last year as a senior professional in my field, it is very humbling to be a newcomer to Wikipedia trying to get my first article published.

Again, thank you for your help.

Regards,

Bill McDade

10:23:53, 26 January 2016 review of submission by Silverspoon83


Hi Matthew. I think I've updated and submitted the draft correctly now :/ ... the draft is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cheltenham_OLBG_Mares%27_Handicap_Hurdle . i find it very confusing!

09:49:37, 27 January 2016 review of submission by Jyellen


Hi Matthew.

This is disappointing to hear. We are the promotional arm of the governing body of British horseracing (see our website: http://www.greatbritishracing.com/#/8RfED6Vk5XiKMGua.97).

What kind of references do you wish me to obtain to get verification on this page?

Many thanks,

James.

19:13:22, 17 February 2016 review of submission by NickSaul


Matthew, Thank you for reviewing my article. I understand your concerns regarding the officiality of the holiday. I changed "official" to "unofficial" and stated that it is beginning this year. Since it is beginning this year, there are not many sources to cite yet. I will be building up this holiday page throughout the year, adding content and more source articles as they become available.

Is this enough to have the article published?

18:36:06, 7 March 2016 review of submission by Amer zaffar01


have improved the things that were mentioned

10:41:53, 21 March 2016 review of submission by 117.238.124.151


Hi there. I see you declined my review request for a college page. Well that's completely fine. I'm fairly a newbie. I'll improve. Well this college I was writing about was ordinary one in a rural area with no such historic influence or alumni base. I actually wanted to write a very simple article as it didn't have many references to put on. I still want to edit it and remove the things you mentioned like I should have been unbaised. But I don't want to be declined again. So kindly help me make the changes. Thank you.

GYMGUYZ Wikipedia Help

Hi Matthew, Thank you for taking the time to review the page I submitted for GYMGUYZ. This is my first time writing a page for Wikipedia and obviously, I want to do the best job possible when getting this information onto the site. That being said, I was wondering if you can provide some more direct suggestions on how to get this page up and running. Given the lack of unbiased/neutral information available on GYMGUYZ on the internet, finding sources is proving to be a little bit difficult. What can we do to get this page approved using the sources that we have? Please advise when you can, thank you!

Hello @Rgenhofer:, the main response is that if there's a "lack of coverage" of Gymguyz by neutral, unbiased commentators in news media, business journals, academia, etc. it might not yet qualify for a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia doesn't qualify people/things/organizations based on whether we personally think they're important or not, but rather based on the amount of outside commentary about them. If Gymguyz gets coverage in several major newspapers, Fortune magazine, various physical fitness mags or business journals, it would totally qualify. In the short term though, it looks like most of the coverage you've included is interviews with the founder (can be used to substantiate his own comments but don't count as outside analysis), business listings (listings, ratings, franchise profiles etc. do not count if they don't have expert, vetted analysis included, we're not a directory), and the company's own materials and press releases. Again I strongly advise you look at WP:Notability (businesses) to see the qualifications; fundamentally, we don't publish articles to help publicize and get more people talking about a subject, we publish what's already being said about the subject in a short, summarized digest form. Makes sense? MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shariarshafiq.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shariarshafiq.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19:23:45, 29 March 2016 review of submission by Andrewhmartin




more references added! I figured I would create this page as there was a number of links from other Wikipedia pages to a blank Thistle Finch Distillery page.

CLEAR

Hi Matthew, I'm not even sure I'm writing this in the right place but thank you for your prompt feedback on my draft article on CLEAR. I've already tweaked it slightly as per your suggestion and I'll work on it this weekend to expand the coverage. Regards,

What more historical data do you need?

Re: Draft:The Dutch Masters - 1960’s Chicagoland Rock and Roll Band

What more historical data do you need? The reference of the Production Company and Management can prove a record was cut and the powerful notoriety of this powerful Chicago Rock band....

Hello @76.101.127.133:, did you read the advice left on the top of your page? Telling me to refer to the production company or management has nothing to do with qualifying your draft to be published. Please read WP:Notability (music) which explicitly explains the guidelines for what a music article must include. After you read it, feel free to post back right here and ask any follow-up questions, but please don't just guess that you think that I think is wrong and then argue about it, because you're guessing completely different things. Please read the pink Decline box and read the linked guideline there and it will become much clearer. Then after that feel free to post here with any questions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Renatoalas/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lakun.patra (talk) 11:05, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dinesh Soi (2)

Hello, MatthewVanitas. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Dinesh Soi".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 13:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21:24:10, 7 April 2016 review of submission by Deuce222



Hi Matthew. Why do I keep getting a resubmit button when I check my sandbox? I can't tell if it's being rejected again after my edits supporting notability or if it is for some other reason. Thanks.

Article IBM System/360 Model 25 renamed to 360 Model 25

Matthew,

On March 18th, you moved my draft article "IBM System/360 Model 25" to "360 Model 25". Can you please explain what was the reason? The existing articles about other /360 models are all titled "IBM System/360 Model nn" (check the articles for models 30, 44, 50, and 67), so I think this should be kept as "IBM System/360 Model 25" for consistency.

Thanks,

Gmacedoj (talk) 13:04, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]