Talk:Ram pickup: Difference between revisions
Cyberbot II (talk | contribs) Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot |
m Jayron32 moved page Talk:Dodge Ram to Talk:Ram Pickup over redirect: Vehicle was renamed 4 years ago. About time we moved the article. |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 16:08, 11 April 2016
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Getrag 238 manual transmission option
Some 3rd generation Rams were offered with the same Getrag 238 manual transmission package as was offered in the Dakota, when equipped with the 3.7L V6 and / or 4.7L V8 engines. These transmissions replaced the NV3500 when the GM / Chrysler joint venture called 'New Venture Gear' ended. Applicable model years are 2005-2006. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.46.22.101 (talk) 12:52, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Move to Ram (automobile)?
As is detailed in the Ram Trucks article, Chrysler no longer uses the Dodge brand for Ram trucks. It's created a new make called Ram Trucks, which includes the Ram trucks (1500, 2500 and 3500, as described in this article), two vans and a chassis cab truck.
This article is about the Ram line of pickup trucks, so I believe it should be moved to Ram (automobile). Thoughts? Objections? Jesuschex (talk) 18:57, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Agree
It only makes sense to move the article since the title of the article no longer corresponds with the name of the vehicle.Num1dgen (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Disagree - the Dodge Ram was used for a lot longer. Mr.choppers | ✎ 00:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- I also disagree as the new makes started at a year model. There is no reason not to have seperate pages, one for historical vehicals which are not renamed, and are properly refered to as Dodge Trucks; and one for Ram Trucks which is a new product line that only has similarities with the old brand. ~AeSix 66.86.14.225 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- It should definitely be moved to Ram (automobile) in my opinion, as the brand move is an essential part of the vehicle's history. But if I may add, the 2009 model rams were Dodges, so it really doesn't make sense to split the pages. --Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 04:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Dodge Ram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.media.chrysler.com/dcxms/assets/specs/2001DodgeRam25003500FASpecifications.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)