Talk:Tim Spicer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:12, 24 August 2006

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article needs clean-up, should be expanded and stick more to the (open available!) sources. For example, Sandline did not violate the UN embargo on Sierra Leone, but only the british, misinterpreted version of the UN resolution. It is believed that the British as well as the US government might have been involved in the scandal makes the whole incident sound like a conspiracy, which is simply wrong. --Echoray 23:22, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Sandline affair mentionned in the article has nothing to do with Sierra Leone, but with Papua New-Guinea. Red Star

Revision as of 19:19, 15 August 2005 edit Theresa knott (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 22,922 edits m Talk:Tim Spicer on wheels! moved to Talk:Tim Spicer ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:12, 24 August 2006 edit undo Kingbotk (talk \| contribs) 447,274 edits Tag with {{WPBiography}} for WP1.0 assessments/Living persons bio Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{WPBiography\|living=yes\|class=\|importance=}}

	This article needs clean-up, should be expanded and stick more to the (open available!) sources. For example, Sandline did '''not''' violate the UN embargo on Sierra Leone, but only the british, misinterpreted version of the UN resolution. ''It is believed that the British as well as the US government might have been involved in the scandal'' makes the whole incident sound like a conspiracy, which is simply wrong. --[[User:Echoray\|Echoray]] 23:22, 6 May 2005 (UTC)		This article needs clean-up, should be expanded and stick more to the (open available!) sources. For example, Sandline did '''not''' violate the UN embargo on Sierra Leone, but only the british, misinterpreted version of the UN resolution. ''It is believed that the British as well as the US government might have been involved in the scandal'' makes the whole incident sound like a conspiracy, which is simply wrong. --[[User:Echoray\|Echoray]] 23:22, 6 May 2005 (UTC)