Talk:Student's t-test: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Student's t-test/Archive 1) (bot |
No edit summary |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
==Student t test== |
==Student t test== |
||
What are people's thoughts about changing this to the Student t test, with an italicized t? This removal of the possessive and use of italics is as per AMA style. Removing the hyphen is also according to AMA style, but it is also just logical; the hyphen should be retained only if the term is being used as a modifier (eg, "the t-test results"). Any objections? |
What are people's thoughts about changing this to the Student t test, with an italicized t? This removal of the possessive and use of italics is as per AMA style. Removing the hyphen is also according to AMA style, but it is also just logical; the hyphen should be retained only if the term is being used as a modifier (eg, "the t-test results"). Any objections? |
||
:Well, no objections have been made. If some of you do object, maybe me being bold and making the aforementioned change will spur you to comment so we can discuss the issue properly.[[Special:Contributions/211.23.25.61|211.23.25.61]] ([[User talk:211.23.25.61|talk]]) 07:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/211.23.25.61|211.23.25.61]] ([[User talk:211.23.25.61|talk]]) 07:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:12, 20 April 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Student's t-test article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Student's t-test article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
rotted link
Link to reference [9] for proc ttest in SAS is rotten. 131.249.80.207 (talk) 20:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)EAC
Unclear contribution by Texyalen
The recent contribution by User:Texyalen doesn't seem very useful to me without some explanation or at least one or two sentences of context. On the other hand, it will be very confusing or even deterring to beginners. Also, I can't make any sense out of some of the terms (see also copyedits by later contributors). Note that (1) Texyalen has posted the exact same content on Log-rank test and Logistic regression (there even a second time), and (2) they have refused to discuss any of their contributions [1].
If you want to add this back into the article, please refine it and make it understandable - or, even better, put it in one of the introductory articles on the topic, or create one in its own right. Here is the full contribution of Texyalen (with copyedits by others and demoted heading):
Statistical Comparison
variable type |
Statistical Unit |
Comparison Test |
regression
|
---|---|---|---|
numerical
|
mean
|
t-test/ANOVA
|
Linear regression |
categorical
|
percentage
|
Chi-square test
|
Logistic regression |
persontime
|
KM estimates (survival curves) |
Log-rank test
|
Cox regression
|
Se'taan (talk) 19:47, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Student t test
What are people's thoughts about changing this to the Student t test, with an italicized t? This removal of the possessive and use of italics is as per AMA style. Removing the hyphen is also according to AMA style, but it is also just logical; the hyphen should be retained only if the term is being used as a modifier (eg, "the t-test results"). Any objections?
- Well, no objections have been made. If some of you do object, maybe me being bold and making the aforementioned change will spur you to comment so we can discuss the issue properly.211.23.25.61 (talk) 07:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
211.23.25.61 (talk) 07:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)