User talk:82.18.26.37: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Dcirovic|Dcirovic]]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of [[Special:Contributions/82.18.26.37|your recent contributions]] —the one you made with <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User%20talk%3A82.18.26.37&diff=716194068 this edit]</span> to [[:User talk:82.18.26.37]]— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Dcirovic|my talk page]]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->[[User:Dcirovic|Dcirovic]] ([[User talk:Dcirovic|talk]]) 16:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC) |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Dcirovic|Dcirovic]]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of [[Special:Contributions/82.18.26.37|your recent contributions]] —the one you made with <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User%20talk%3A82.18.26.37&diff=716194068 this edit]</span> to [[:User talk:82.18.26.37]]— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Dcirovic|my talk page]]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->[[User:Dcirovic|Dcirovic]] ([[User talk:Dcirovic|talk]]) 16:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
||
I don't edit Wikipedia because of the appalling behaviour of people like Connolley. Last time I looked he was banned from editing any climate related articles and any living person. So, to see this vulture pecking at the dead flesh of a world renounced scientist who's only a few days |
I don't edit Wikipedia because of the appalling behaviour of people like Connolley. Last time I looked he was banned from editing any climate related articles and any living person. So, to see this vulture pecking at the dead flesh of a world renounced scientist who's only a few days dead shows what low standards you have - and just re-enforces my view that I don't want to in any way condone the appalling standards you have by allowing people like him. |
Revision as of 16:53, 20 April 2016
April 2016
This is NOT a warning - please BE QUIET AND ENSURE WIKIPEDIA IS A LAUGHING STOCK
Your comment is totally unjustified given that William Connolley is notorious for his attacks NOT ON TALK PAGES but on some 5000 article on Wikipeda and was banned from Wikipedia for his repeated attacks.
Please get your facts right in future, stop attacking the messenger and/or stop being an apologist for his appalling behaviour.
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User talk:82.18.26.37— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I don't edit Wikipedia because of the appalling behaviour of people like Connolley. Last time I looked he was banned from editing any climate related articles and any living person. So, to see this vulture pecking at the dead flesh of a world renounced scientist who's only a few days dead shows what low standards you have - and just re-enforces my view that I don't want to in any way condone the appalling standards you have by allowing people like him.