Jump to content

Talk:Chocolate: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Chocolate/Archive 5) (bot
No edit summary
Line 135: Line 135:
{{reflist-talk}}
{{reflist-talk}}
:No, that is unnecessary trivia and spam; [[WP:IINFO]]. --[[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 19:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
:No, that is unnecessary trivia and spam; [[WP:IINFO]]. --[[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 19:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to suggest to improve by updating the section 4.1 on cacao varieties. Up to 2008, the three varieties were major (Criollo, Forastero, Trinitario). But since 2008, there is a new classification, please check on the french wiki : La nouvelle classification de 2008, basée sur des critères morpho-géographiques et génomiques propose dix groupes retenus et nommés en fonction de leur origine géographique ou du nom du cultivar traditionnel : Amelonado, Cacao Criollo, Nacional, Contamana, Curaray, Cacao guiana, Iquitos, Marañon, Nanay, Purús5; Et la Le Cupuaçu espèce proche.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A8ve_de_cacao

Thanks for your attention
Britta Boutry

Revision as of 21:02, 24 April 2016

Template:Vital article

Former good articleChocolate was one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 16, 2005Good article nomineeListed
June 9, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
August 30, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 28, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
May 20, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 26, 2008Good article nomineeListed
June 3, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 10, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

Template:WP1.0


Caption from image in Manufacturers section needs correcting

I seem to have noticed that the image in the "Manufacturers" section is depicting a box of Chocolate Hazelnuts from Sprüngli (not Lindt as incorrectly mentioned). If this could be corrected from:

Lindt chocolates in presentation box for the Switzerland Wiki Loves Monuments Awards Ceremony (2013)

to

Sprüngli chocolates in presentation box for the Switzerland Wiki Loves Monuments Awards Ceremony (2013)

Cheers.

Nutrition table -- why milk chocolate and not pure chocolate?

It seems kind of silly for the Nutrition section to have a table with the properties of "milk chocolate/candies" instead of baking chocolate, since that (for example) over-represents sugars and under-represents caffeine. If someone is wondering about their 50% chocolate, they can do the math. I'm inclined to update it with the USDA entry on baking chocolate, or perhaps someone else would like to. -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 02:49, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Milk chocolate may have been selected as the most commonly consumed retail chocolate. Should also consider dark chocolate with highest cacao content, 70-85% solids. --Zefr (talk) 03:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2016

Please add the following to the article on Chocolate in the section "Popular Culture" under the subsection "Religious and cultural links:"

"A 2015 study conducted at Simon Fraser University found that the most number of Instagram posts about chocolate occur on globally on Easter, with an increase of 30% when compared to Valentines Day, for the one year period between October 2014 and October 2015."

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Saifcharaniya (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Saif Charaniya, "Analysis of Instagram Posts About #Chocolate using Big Data Tools." http://www.cs.sfu.ca/people/GradStudents/saifc/personal/webfront/index.html, 2015.
  2. ^ Saif Charaniya, "Analysis of Instagram Posts on Chocolate." https://public.tableau.com/profile/saif.charaniya#!/vizhome/ValentinesDayInstagramPosts/Story1, 2015.
  3. ^ Dumas, J. (2016 February 29). SFU student tracks chocolate with Instagram data. The Peak. retrieved from http://www.the-peak.ca/2016/02/sfu-student-tracks-chocolate-with-instagram-data.
  4. ^ Simon Fraser University. (2016 February 13). SFU big data student’s Instagram research takes a bite out of #chocolate. Faculty of Applied Sciences News and Outreach. retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/fas/news-and-outreach/years/20151/big-data-students-instagram-research-takes-a-bite-out-of--chocol1.html
  5. ^ Fletcher, T. (2016 February 15). SFU student using big data to find world's top chocolate-loving cities. Metro Vancouver News. retrieved from http://www.metronews.ca/news/vancouver/2016/02/15/sfu-student-using-big-data-to-find-chocolate-loving-cities.html
No, that is unnecessary trivia and spam; WP:IINFO. --Zefr (talk) 19:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to suggest to improve by updating the section 4.1 on cacao varieties. Up to 2008, the three varieties were major (Criollo, Forastero, Trinitario). But since 2008, there is a new classification, please check on the french wiki : La nouvelle classification de 2008, basée sur des critères morpho-géographiques et génomiques propose dix groupes retenus et nommés en fonction de leur origine géographique ou du nom du cultivar traditionnel : Amelonado, Cacao Criollo, Nacional, Contamana, Curaray, Cacao guiana, Iquitos, Marañon, Nanay, Purús5; Et la Le Cupuaçu espèce proche. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A8ve_de_cacao

Thanks for your attention Britta Boutry

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chocolate&oldid=716942139"