Jump to content

Talk:Species: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Species/Archive 2) (bot
Line 20: Line 20:
==Is "species" a social concept?==
==Is "species" a social concept?==
See discussion on [[Talk:Race_(biology)#Social_concept]] [[User:Captain JT Verity MBA|Captain JT Verity MBA]] ([[User talk:Captain JT Verity MBA|talk]]) 14:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
See discussion on [[Talk:Race_(biology)#Social_concept]] [[User:Captain JT Verity MBA|Captain JT Verity MBA]] ([[User talk:Captain JT Verity MBA|talk]]) 14:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

== Difficulty defining or identifying species ==

i see quite a few "citation needed" tags in this section. now, it may not be really much of a help, but this link (http://www.macroevolution.net) discusses all or most of these topics (though this is just a starting point, someone would still need to find the exact part of the text that could be used as reference).

the species concept seems to be a scientific artefact from the times when divine creation was the sole scientific theory with the most explanative power, and its survival must be partially explained by its deep embeddedness int common sense, eg: how to tell the dog from the hog.[[Special:Contributions/80.98.114.70|80.98.114.70]] ([[User talk:80.98.114.70|talk]]) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC).

Revision as of 23:40, 27 April 2016

Template:Vital article

Is "species" a social concept?

See discussion on Talk:Race_(biology)#Social_concept Captain JT Verity MBA (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Difficulty defining or identifying species

i see quite a few "citation needed" tags in this section. now, it may not be really much of a help, but this link (http://www.macroevolution.net) discusses all or most of these topics (though this is just a starting point, someone would still need to find the exact part of the text that could be used as reference).

the species concept seems to be a scientific artefact from the times when divine creation was the sole scientific theory with the most explanative power, and its survival must be partially explained by its deep embeddedness int common sense, eg: how to tell the dog from the hog.80.98.114.70 (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]