Talk:Species: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Species/Archive 2) (bot |
→Difficulty defining or identifying species: new section |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Is "species" a social concept?== |
==Is "species" a social concept?== |
||
See discussion on [[Talk:Race_(biology)#Social_concept]] [[User:Captain JT Verity MBA|Captain JT Verity MBA]] ([[User talk:Captain JT Verity MBA|talk]]) 14:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC) |
See discussion on [[Talk:Race_(biology)#Social_concept]] [[User:Captain JT Verity MBA|Captain JT Verity MBA]] ([[User talk:Captain JT Verity MBA|talk]]) 14:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Difficulty defining or identifying species == |
|||
i see quite a few "citation needed" tags in this section. now, it may not be really much of a help, but this link (http://www.macroevolution.net) discusses all or most of these topics (though this is just a starting point, someone would still need to find the exact part of the text that could be used as reference). |
|||
the species concept seems to be a scientific artefact from the times when divine creation was the sole scientific theory with the most explanative power, and its survival must be partially explained by its deep embeddedness int common sense, eg: how to tell the dog from the hog.[[Special:Contributions/80.98.114.70|80.98.114.70]] ([[User talk:80.98.114.70|talk]]) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC). |
Revision as of 23:40, 27 April 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Species article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:WP1.0
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Is "species" a social concept?
See discussion on Talk:Race_(biology)#Social_concept Captain JT Verity MBA (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Difficulty defining or identifying species
i see quite a few "citation needed" tags in this section. now, it may not be really much of a help, but this link (http://www.macroevolution.net) discusses all or most of these topics (though this is just a starting point, someone would still need to find the exact part of the text that could be used as reference).
the species concept seems to be a scientific artefact from the times when divine creation was the sole scientific theory with the most explanative power, and its survival must be partially explained by its deep embeddedness int common sense, eg: how to tell the dog from the hog.80.98.114.70 (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC).
- C-Class Biology articles
- Top-importance Biology articles
- WikiProject Biology articles
- C-Class Evolutionary biology articles
- Top-importance Evolutionary biology articles
- WikiProject Evolutionary biology articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class philosophy of science articles
- Mid-importance philosophy of science articles
- Philosophy of science task force articles
- C-Class taxonomic articles
- Top-importance taxonomic articles
- WikiProject Tree of Life articles