Jump to content

Talk:American Economic Association: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
TommyBoy (talk | contribs)
Rate as Start-class for WikiProject Organizations
JJMC89 bot (talk | contribs)
subst /Comments to discontinue comments subpage) (AWB [12009]
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Economics|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Economics|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Organizations|class=start|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Organizations|class=start|importance=}}
Line 16: Line 16:
==Accusation of Bias?==
==Accusation of Bias?==
I'm not entirely sure what the relevance of the "Bias" section is. If one looks at all of the social sciences, across the board there is a more progressive bent to them--Economics is no different. Why feign 1) that we can eliminate bias or should disclose it in every possible way and 2) pretend like there would even be an AEA with non-progressives at the healm. The very marker of the AEA is social scientists working with policy makers to direct national and international fiscal thinking. Isn't that in and of itself biased? I think this is less a controversy than American conservatives may want it to be. I also wonder that, if one looks at the AEA from a global perspective, if the allegiance to the Democratic party over the Republicans really matters. I propose that this section be deleted as it adds nothing to the article and is not supported anyway. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.230.100.99|64.230.100.99]] ([[User talk:64.230.100.99|talk]]) 15:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I'm not entirely sure what the relevance of the "Bias" section is. If one looks at all of the social sciences, across the board there is a more progressive bent to them--Economics is no different. Why feign 1) that we can eliminate bias or should disclose it in every possible way and 2) pretend like there would even be an AEA with non-progressives at the healm. The very marker of the AEA is social scientists working with policy makers to direct national and international fiscal thinking. Isn't that in and of itself biased? I think this is less a controversy than American conservatives may want it to be. I also wonder that, if one looks at the AEA from a global perspective, if the allegiance to the Democratic party over the Republicans really matters. I propose that this section be deleted as it adds nothing to the article and is not supported anyway. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.230.100.99|64.230.100.99]] ([[User talk:64.230.100.99|talk]]) 15:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Assessment comment==
{{Substituted comment|length=145|lastedit=20090520082703|comment=Well, the AEA is obviously the most important economics association, but it is definitely not the oldest. See e.g. [[Verein für Socialpolitik]].}}
Substituted at 07:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:33, 29 April 2016

Too Americentric?

I don't know much about this topic, but I'm concerned that in calling the AEA the "oldest and most important professional organization in the field of economics" that we may be neglecting important organizations outside the USA. Is this article too Americentric? Deco 04:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, most science is americentric, so it doesn't really surprise me. The AEA seems to be the most important with over 18,000 members. The Royal Economic Society, for example, claims 3,000 members. But I'm more surprised that the AEA is so small, compare it to the ACM with 82,000 members and 40 or so publications. --Vesal 14:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vanderbilt

Isnt the Association housed at Vanderbilt University? The website seems to indicate so. Why isnt this mentioned in the article?

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Economic_Association"

Accusation of Bias?

I'm not entirely sure what the relevance of the "Bias" section is. If one looks at all of the social sciences, across the board there is a more progressive bent to them--Economics is no different. Why feign 1) that we can eliminate bias or should disclose it in every possible way and 2) pretend like there would even be an AEA with non-progressives at the healm. The very marker of the AEA is social scientists working with policy makers to direct national and international fiscal thinking. Isn't that in and of itself biased? I think this is less a controversy than American conservatives may want it to be. I also wonder that, if one looks at the AEA from a global perspective, if the allegiance to the Democratic party over the Republicans really matters. I propose that this section be deleted as it adds nothing to the article and is not supported anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.100.99 (talk) 15:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:American Economic Association/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Well, the AEA is obviously the most important economics association, but it is definitely not the oldest. See e.g. Verein für Socialpolitik.

Last edited at 08:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 07:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)