Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Day of Research: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:02, 25 August 2006

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Day of Research

Five cleanup tags on one article? Not a good sign. Unsourced naked tracklist, apparently for an album by Gerling, but this is the only one in a list of red links with an "article". Clearly doesn't need to be separate. Opabinia regalis 04:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete per nom. Is that 5 cleanup tags? It's a sight for sore eyes. Plus an AFD tag and a music stub tag and the templates are 3x longer than the track listing, plus all categories are for the tags: the only one close to the subject is the stub template. Wow. What a delete! TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 04:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete and I'm getting rid of the cleanup tags in the meantime. There is absolutely no reason to have them on a page, IMO, as long as it's up for deletion. It sends a mixed message, for one thing. Daniel Case 05:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Fails everything, and I mean everything. SynergeticMaggot 12:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Angelbo 21:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per nom. —Michael Hays 16:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.  ''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 14:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 ===[[A Day of Research]]===
 Five cleanup tags on one article? Not a good sign. Unsourced naked tracklist, apparently for an album by [[Gerling]], but this is the only one in a list of red links with an "article". Clearly doesn't need to be separate. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] 04:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
@@ Line 6: / Line 14: @@
 *'''Delete''' -  per nom. [[User:Angelbo|Angelbo]] 21:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Strong delete''' per nom. —[[User:Bluedustmite|Michael Hays]] 16:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>