User talk:TheLibertyLover: Difference between revisions
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
I made correct factual edits with citations. he just came on and claimed I did vandalism when is putting up fake candidates and false election results. (liberty lover) |
I made correct factual edits with citations. he just came on and claimed I did vandalism when is putting up fake candidates and false election results. (The liberty lover) |
||
::I've taken a step back and allowed for myself to cool down. In retrospect, I overreacted to your edits and I apologize for that. The problem is that unreferenced straw polls are being claimed as primaries. There is a big difference between straw polls and primaries. Also, this page is not a list of Libertarian presidential candidates. It is a list of primary results. You removed candidates who attained ballot access in states. These candidates were referenced. Whether they are recognized by the national party is irrelevant. I hope we can come to an agreement on this matter.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn|talk]]) 06:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC) |
::I've taken a step back and allowed for myself to cool down. In retrospect, I overreacted to your edits and I apologize for that. The problem is that unreferenced straw polls are being claimed as primaries. There is a big difference between straw polls and primaries. Also, this page is not a list of Libertarian presidential candidates. It is a list of primary results. You removed candidates who attained ballot access in states. These candidates were referenced. Whether they are recognized by the national party is irrelevant. I hope we can come to an agreement on this matter.--[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn|talk]]) 06:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
Okay fair enough. Im new to wikipedia as I know now not to get in an edit war. If you are to re add these candidates and there vote totals please have citations. For the side template maybe have straw poll victories, popular vote, percentage and states won. Can we agree though Uncommitted is not a candidate. (The Liberty Lover) |
Revision as of 06:51, 8 May 2016
TheLibertyLover, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi TheLibertyLover! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC) |
3RR Violation
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Vandal warning
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Im not committing vandalism. Your putting up old and incorrect information. I will continue as much as I can to fix your false information
Back off -- Use Talkpage
Both you and Saturn should stop. Use the article talk page to discuss the proposed edits. If you can't reach an agreement, then post a request to WP:3O. – S. Rich (talk) 06:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
I made correct factual edits with citations. he just came on and claimed I did vandalism when is putting up fake candidates and false election results. (The liberty lover)
- I've taken a step back and allowed for myself to cool down. In retrospect, I overreacted to your edits and I apologize for that. The problem is that unreferenced straw polls are being claimed as primaries. There is a big difference between straw polls and primaries. Also, this page is not a list of Libertarian presidential candidates. It is a list of primary results. You removed candidates who attained ballot access in states. These candidates were referenced. Whether they are recognized by the national party is irrelevant. I hope we can come to an agreement on this matter.--William S. Saturn (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Okay fair enough. Im new to wikipedia as I know now not to get in an edit war. If you are to re add these candidates and there vote totals please have citations. For the side template maybe have straw poll victories, popular vote, percentage and states won. Can we agree though Uncommitted is not a candidate. (The Liberty Lover)