User talk:AcidRock67: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:02, 15 May 2016

Welcome!

Hello, AcidRock67, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TFD (talk) 21:39, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Timothy Leary with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even though it isn't crossing the bright line of 3RR, this edit shows intent to continue to edit war. I strongly encourage you to undo the edit yourself as a show of good faith and that you're willing to discuss the situation and get consensus before adding the material.
I look forward to your reply here. Oh, while you're at the reply, pay note to the text above the edit box, where it says "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable." —C.Fred (talk) 02:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall there ever being a consensus to remove it in the first place. --AcidRock67 (talk) 03:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:48, 15 May 2016 edit C.Fred (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 277,596 edits →Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion: encourage user to self-revert ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:02, 15 May 2016 edit undo AcidRock67 (talk \| contribs) 91 edits →Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion Next edit →
Line 22:		Line 22:

	*Even though it isn't crossing the bright line of 3RR, [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Timothy_Leary&diff=720315303&oldid=720311601 this edit] shows intent to continue to edit war. I strongly encourage you to undo the edit yourself as a show of good faith and that you're willing to discuss the situation and get consensus before adding the material.{{pb}}I look forward to your reply here. Oh, while you're at the reply, pay note to the text above the edit box, where it says "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable." —'''[[User:C.Fred\|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred\|talk]]) 02:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)		*Even though it isn't crossing the bright line of 3RR, [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Timothy_Leary&diff=720315303&oldid=720311601 this edit] shows intent to continue to edit war. I strongly encourage you to undo the edit yourself as a show of good faith and that you're willing to discuss the situation and get consensus before adding the material.{{pb}}I look forward to your reply here. Oh, while you're at the reply, pay note to the text above the edit box, where it says "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable." —'''[[User:C.Fred\|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred\|talk]]) 02:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
			I don't recall there ever being a consensus to remove it in the first place. --[[User:AcidRock67\|AcidRock67]] ([[User talk:AcidRock67#top\|talk]]) 03:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)