Talk:Gulripshi

Name

Per WP:COMMONNAME, this article's name must be Gulripshi, see Google Book Ngram viewer. --g. balaxaZe✰ 11:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Pointless reverts

Some users here (@The Drover's Wife:,@Chipmunkdavis:) think that they are the only right side and remove every change what is in connection with Georgia. My last edits modified previous user's work and make article more acceptable for both sides, why we must show only Abkhazia map, when for most of the world this settlement located not only in Abkhazia but in Georgia as well (so bigger map of Georgia is preferable). Next, they are removing native name in Georgian - Why?. Next about de facto, de jure issue, previously this was discussed in wikipedia and we agreed that it will be good if we have one standard for conflict regions and we accepted (*Sovereign Country* (*conflict region*) formulation), why another user's de facto/de jure is preferable than discussed one? And also Abkhazia is not even a de facto country, it is under active military control of Russia, controlling army, land, government, and Abkhazia's budget is formed from Russian money by 73 percent (!) it's definitely not a country or even more - independent one. And remember these are not just my views but facts that I read and can provide.--g. balaxaZe★ 10:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

I reverted your edits because you're trying to play out nationalist battles on a random town and it's not the place. Regardless of your position on the status of Abkhazia, no one disputes that Gulripshi is geographically in Abkhazia, so the map of Abkhazia makes no claim either way - whereas the map of Georgia takes a clear opinion on the matter of its status.

You may well have personally decided that you should refer to conflict regions in a way that suits the Georgian nationalist perspective, but unless that was actually incorporated into Wikipedia guidelines somewhere, that is irrelevant to this article.

You know full well that "definitely not a country" is a matter of opinion, and Wikipedia has a whole bunch of articles on the status of Abkhazia where you can fight that question away to your little heart's content. It doesn't change the actual fact that it's completely irrelevant to this article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 10:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

What you call nationalistic, for nationalists there is no another Abkhazia except Autonomous, but I recognize that this is conflict region and very sensitive. And no, your preferred map of Abkhazia is not neutral in this case, there must but its location in Georgia as well but because of article is to small we can't put here both maps that's why bigger map that includes both parts is better. We say that it is also in Georgia but no one will know where it is on the map of Georgia.

And explain what you mean in Georgian nationalist perspective because I have no idea what you dream in this. I can say that you are supporting Abkhazian nationalist perspective when can't see formulations the capital of the republic' as inappropriate and removing them only after my words.--g. balaxaZe★ 10:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)