Talk:Per-unit system: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Apparati?!: new section |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I added a paragraph about the steps for calculating per-unit system into the original "purpose" column.[[User:Hsiu Wei Chang|Hsiu Wei Chang]] ([[User talk:Hsiu Wei Chang|talk]]) 05:42, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Hsiu-Wei |
I added a paragraph about the steps for calculating per-unit system into the original "purpose" column.[[User:Hsiu Wei Chang|Hsiu Wei Chang]] ([[User talk:Hsiu Wei Chang|talk]]) 05:42, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Hsiu-Wei |
||
== Apparati?! == |
|||
In English, the plural of ''apparatus'' is ''apparatuses''. |
|||
If you must be pedantic and insist that it's a Latin word, then get it right. The plural is ''apparatus'', not ''apparati''. It's a fourth-declension noun, not second-declension masculine. See [[Latin_declension#Fourth_declension_.28u.29|Latin 4th declension]] |
|||
I won't bother editing the article; it'll only get reversed. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/109.157.82.217|109.157.82.217]] ([[User talk:109.157.82.217|talk]]) 21:08, 5 June 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:08, 5 June 2016
This is wrong, but I'm too busy to fix it now.
The example at the bottom is correct though so overall the article is fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.107.165.53 (talk • contribs)
14-Apr-2013: I followed the link for short circuit, but it took me to short circuit in a computer programming context, not a power systems context. I don't know how to fix this, but it would be great if someone could... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.52.185.71 (talk) 12:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- [1] Done (Although, I couldn't find any article specifically about short-circuit evaluation in power systems, so I just linked it to short circuit) Dalba (talk) 11:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
I added a paragraph about the steps for calculating per-unit system into the original "purpose" column.Hsiu Wei Chang (talk) 05:42, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Hsiu-Wei
Apparati?!
In English, the plural of apparatus is apparatuses. If you must be pedantic and insist that it's a Latin word, then get it right. The plural is apparatus, not apparati. It's a fourth-declension noun, not second-declension masculine. See Latin 4th declension
I won't bother editing the article; it'll only get reversed.