Wittman v. Personhuballah: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
new page |
m Substing templates: {{scite}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info. |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
'''''Wittman v. Personhuballah''''', {{ |
'''''Wittman v. Personhuballah''''', {{Ussc|578|___|2016|el=no}}, was a [[Supreme Court of the United States|United States Supreme Court]] case in which the Court held that the appellants lacked [[standing (law)|standing]] under [[Article III of the United States Constitution]] to pursue their appeal.<ref name="slip-opinion">{{cite web|url=http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-1504_6khn.pdf|title=Wittman v. Personhuballah, 578 U.S. ___|accessdate=2016-05-30}}</ref> |
||
== References == |
== References == |
||
Revision as of 18:37, 6 June 2016
| Wittman v. Personhuballah | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 21, 2016 Decided May 23, 2016 | |
| Full case name | Robert J. Wittman, et al., Appellants v. Gloria Personhuballah, et al. |
| Docket no. | 14–1504 |
| Citations | 578 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Breyer, joined by unanimous |
Wittman v. Personhuballah, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the appellants lacked standing under Article III of the United States Constitution to pursue their appeal.[1]
References
- ^ "Wittman v. Personhuballah, 578 U.S. ___" (PDF). Retrieved 2016-05-30.
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |