Jump to content

User talk:Oshwah: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 74.100.33.118 - ""
WTH: new section
Line 758: Line 758:
In the [[Allan Quatermain]] entry, a citation was requested about the name Quatermain often being misspelled and I gave a perfectly fine one. That was a few days ago. Today it has been removed. That does not bode well for my recent important well-cited entries noting how Uncle Scrooge was a precursor of Indiana Jones. I decided that rather than wait on the edge of my seat waiting for some editor to remove those remarks, I decided to remove them myself. Also the same thing goes for the list of Indiana Jones ---Novelizations and Novels--- that I also added. No doubt some editor would come along and say the list is redundant of [[Indiana Jones franchise]].
In the [[Allan Quatermain]] entry, a citation was requested about the name Quatermain often being misspelled and I gave a perfectly fine one. That was a few days ago. Today it has been removed. That does not bode well for my recent important well-cited entries noting how Uncle Scrooge was a precursor of Indiana Jones. I decided that rather than wait on the edge of my seat waiting for some editor to remove those remarks, I decided to remove them myself. Also the same thing goes for the list of Indiana Jones ---Novelizations and Novels--- that I also added. No doubt some editor would come along and say the list is redundant of [[Indiana Jones franchise]].
Bottom line: I do not have the temperment to be a Wikipedia contributor. Best Regards. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/74.100.33.118|74.100.33.118]] ([[User talk:74.100.33.118|talk]]) 04:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Bottom line: I do not have the temperment to be a Wikipedia contributor. Best Regards. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/74.100.33.118|74.100.33.118]] ([[User talk:74.100.33.118|talk]]) 04:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== WTH ==

DUDE WTH I SPENT SO MUCH TIME WHO EVEN CARES ABOUT REECE OXFORD

Revision as of 04:45, 8 June 2016



Let's chat


Click here to message me. I will reply as soon as I can. All replies will be made directly underneath your message on this page.

Please create your message with a subject/headline and sign your message using four tildes (~~~~) at the end.


Experienced editors have my permission to talk page stalk and respond to any message or contribute to any thread here.


No subject

I was wondering how my edit was more than neutral I didn't mean to offend anyone. I'm sorry if I did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by InfiniFighter (talkcontribs) 00:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi InfiniFighter! Thanks for leaving me a message! The reason for my message was because of this edit, where you add commentary and opinion regarding the units in the game. Remember that we must remain neutral; if a reference talks about its weakness, you can cite it and talk about how reviewers called the unit weak (just to give you an idea). But no harm done; we were all new once! Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it was just a joke

I was going to change it back myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.46.205.231 (talk) 01:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi

thanks for letting me know i am trying to make a wiki of a show i made on youtube so i was useing that to get it to be right on youtube sorry about that anyways right now there are only 2 episodes and a few shorts episodes are about 5 minutes right now but im just starting out so i will get more episodes to be longer if you want to see them i can give you the link and i will try out what you said — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goody2shoes3590 (talkcontribs) 01:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the Article 'Annexation of Goa' to the 'Liberation of Goa'

Unless the change is made the article itself is inherently biased towards the occupying Portuguese forces, thereby qualifying it as a constructive change. Goa has and will always be an integral part of India, and the article itself reflects this through the sections detailing the liberation and independence movements that occurred both before, during, and after the necessary military action undertaken by the Indian Forces. There is nothing more to add.

If your reversion of my edits was a mistake, please try out the 'sandbox' before changing it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.43.29.24 (talk) 01:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

THE NAME OF THE GAME TV SERIES

I received an e-mail from Shout Factory today stating that they cancelled the DVD. So, I imagine that it is ok to say that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.110.3.50 (talk) 01:47, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

THE NAME OF THE GAME TV SERIES

I don't understand what your problem is young man. I did cite a source, do you have a supervisor or someone else I can talk to. I was following this show before you were born. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.110.3.50 (talk) 01:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

gene logsdon passed away today

https://thecontraryfarmer.wordpress.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.101.5.24 (talk) 02:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Urbana High School

If you were wondering about the changed I did on the Urbana High School Page, I fixed the category problem since the school actually opened in 1995, not 1996 because it says on the page that the school was established in 1995. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Idiotboyxbox360 (talkcontribs) 02:08, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

please stop reverting/flagging me

Hi Oshwah, please stop reverting and flagging my pages. They are legit. I am an instructor for the class Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Penn State Brandywine/Language and Thought (Summer 2016). I am making pages on my students user pages/sandboxes for them to complete projects with. You also reverted my own user page for some reason I'm not sure of. Please let me know if you have any questions. yEvb0 (talk) 02:24, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

YEvb0 - I'm looking into this now. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
YEvb0 - I'm rolling everything back now. Please accept my dearest and most humble apologies. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! yEvb0 (talk) 02:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
yEvb0 - Alright, my friend. You're all set. Everything should be back to where it was before my stupidity managed to mess it up. Thank you so much for letting me know ASAP. I'm extremely sorry about that, man. I deal with a lot of vandalism, and some accounts do leave mass spam on user talk pages. You just happened to be a huge false positive. If there's anything I missed, or if you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to let me know. Again, I feel extremely bad about this and I owe you a big one. :-( ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

please delete this page

Oshwah: could you delete this page?

Have been trying to delete the page but could not figure out how. Thanks in advance. Zan752

Hi Zan752. I've replaced the speedy deletion tag with the version that states that you're requesting it to be removed. And administrator will take care of it shortly. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am NOT vandalizing wikipedia pages - I am adding FACTUAL INFORMATION that is being intentionally deleted by Wikipedia people with FAKE non-human names

I am NOT vandalizing wikipedia pages - I am adding FACTUAL INFORMATION that is being intentionally deleted by Wikipedia people with FAKE non-human names I added one comment BACK to Kshama Sawant's page based on publicly verifiable facts. change.org petition and other info available on the web. Call Kshama herself and she will VERIFY it. There is anti-bernie sanders bias sentiment happening in these edits by pro KKKlinton individuals and I have to INSIST that it stop. I can report it to the Bernie campaign office and then you'll be all over the news AND have to reveal their REAL names and connections. Thanks, Jax

--Jaxmullins (talk) 03:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(tps) @Jaxmullins: Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner (see WP:CIVIL). Making personal attacks and threats against other editors is against Wikipedia's policies because these actions can be damaging to the community and deter users. Please keep cool if you have a dispute with other editors and address it civilly in the appropriate venue. RA0808 talkcontribs 03:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HI

Hi, I have a question about the self balancing scooter, why did you revert my content while the information I provided is the fact and would be helpful to the community?

Hi Oshwah, just to inform you that my information on Ibinabo is accurate. She contested in 1991 Miss Nigeria pageant (not 1998) and was first runner up to the winner, Bibiana Ohio. She also contested in a pageant called Miss Wonderland in 1990 and she was the 2nd runner up for Nike Oshinowo in MBGN pageant in 1992. Check your sources, I know that I am right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.99.34.6 (talk) 03:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You sire are fast

fast!!! dang TheDwellerCamp (talk) 03:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TheDwellerCamp - Thanks man! Keep practicing with CSD! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oshwah I think that "tag" works. Can I CSD your page? TheDwellerCamp (talk) 04:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal 173.169.126.238 appears to have hopped IPs, is now editing from 108.34.150.59 if you can look... Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 04:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh please. You are the one inserting contentious material without consensus. Also unrelated. No need to be paranoid. 108.34.150.59 (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Page protected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:27, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Edit history (see this diff as an example) indicates the IP is either a sockpuppet, or a coached meatpuppet. Humorously, the information they are attempting is wrong even by the standards of Kyle's autobiographical claims - before the actual, authoritative military records were released Kyle had claimed 5 Bronze Stars, the authoritative military records show only 3, the IP is claiming SIX... Do you think it's worth time asking someone to Checkuser them, Oshwah? Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 04:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No subject

OI Mate Back off im having fun and my big brother was annyoing me im trying to do an essay im 12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tristy Yo (talkcontribs) 04:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OI Mate Back off im having fun and my big brother was annyoing me im trying to do an essay im 12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tristy Yo (talkcontribs) 04:36, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Fraser

Yo Oshwah I know my grilled cheese comment to be a fact I know Bruce Fraser personally. Don't delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.30.16.68 (talk) 04:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Berbers with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:47, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Berbers with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

i have removed some contents and add other content because there is mistakes on this page and i'm BERBER IN ORIGINE. please leave my changes on this pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brahim213 (talkcontribs) 05:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dr._U._Srinivasa_Rangan

"Hi Oshwah I want to create a page forour professor Dr. U Srinivasa Rangan can you please help me " Rashmim6 (talk) 05:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Jerod Tate edits

Please reinstate the changes to Impichchaachaaha'. The first "a" is underlined because it is a nasal vowel and is my correct spelling of my name. Thanks! :)

I also made some minor detail additions/corrections, all of which should adhere to Wiki guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.194.101 (talk) 06:12, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No subject

Will you known that, FSC Rupandehi is the fast nonprofits organisations for farmers in Nepal. This is a great information page about farmers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dev Dhawal (talkcontribs) 06:23, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hello

I was trying to correct some mis-information on Pierce Freelon's page. For example, he is not a CEO of Black Academics, he is not currently in Ghana, or a board member of the NC Arts Council, among many other factual errors. Why was my attempt at updating the page blocked? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Durhamight (talkcontribs) 06:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Durhamight! It's because, with one of your edits, you removed content without an edit summary. I reviewed your changes, and I have restored the article. In the future, you'll want to use edit summaries to explain any changes. If you have any questions, please let me know. Happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:27, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Making a correction to whom the inventor was and whom the manufacture was.

I want to make a correction to whom the inventor was and whom the manufacture was. and update some of the websites with articles from media sites.

"The first one-inch zipper was created by YKK in 2001 for Dorinha Jeans clothing line the original inventor of the one inch zipper,:"

06:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalereynolds (talkcontribs)

61.9.218.168

I have reported the IP to WP:AIV. Any additional comments such as your talk page being vandalized should be clarified. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 06:43, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JudeccaXIII - Awesome! Thanks for filing the report! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, definitely you made a mistake

You made a mistake by claiming that my edit wasn't "constructive", on the article Terry Bean. If you want people to take your claims seriously, you need to fully explain why you are trying to revert material and why it isn't "constructive", in your opinion. I will restore this material, anticipating that you will not be able to explain why my edits weren't "constructive". Please do not proceed with an edit war against me. 67.5.251.135 (talk) 06:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cookies for Santa

Wikipedia is indeed an educational place - you made me look up the American tradition of leaving cookies out for Santa Claus, which I'd never heard about! (In Sweden and several other northern European countries, kids don't need to leave anything for Santa, because he comes a-knocking on the door himself on Christmas Eve, asking if there are any well-behaved children in the house, and handing over the presents in person.) It confused me a little at first because I forgot that your Santa comes in through the chimney and so the cookies are presumably left indoors and eaten by the parents when they place the gifts... the closest tradition we have here is when people living on farms used to leave a bowl of rice pudding for the tomte at Christmas so he wouldn't leave the farm, and that offering would be left outside. Anyway, thanks! :-D --bonadea contributions talk 06:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonadea! Yeah, ours is an obese gentleman who drinks coca-cola and somehow can fit down chimneys (even though though you have the fire running) and puts toys under a tree that you go into the woods and cut down. You bet! Thanks for helping out with that article; it made dealing with that situation less of a challenge ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i have resource

regarding topic you removed from:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponisha I have resource but it is in persian language I translated: http://manoghalam.mihanblog.com/post/222 and http://forum.shopkeeper.ir/showthread.php?t=26539&p=305842&viewfull=1#post305842 this is scam website with a little expreince I do not understand why should listed in wiki. lot more expreinced similar website exists in iran. Eximal (talk) 07:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eximal - You need to cite your references in-line with your added content, as it helps others verify the authenticity of the content you're adding. Please review these policies and guidelines, and let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content work

I just stubbed:

Feel free to expand those if you are looking for content work. I plan to expand them in the next few days, but you are welcome to them. Such species articles are very easy add content to, unlike crabs or spiders or insects, which have complicated body parts. Also, I gave you two at IRC. Anyhow, if you don't like those, consider other species you can find by shopping via taxoboxes. Lots of stubs, plentiful RS, good, solid encyclopedia building. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anna Frodesiak - What I'm going to do is create/expand some technology-related articles. If I'm going to do some content creation, it should definitely be something I'm interested in, even if it means that the task will be more challenging (which is actually better). There are great suggestions, though (and very nice stubs, if I may say so myself ;-)). Keep on me; I need to and I will do some creation. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Tech, eh? Okay! Sounds good. And not so nice stubs. I'll fill them out. Always do. Say, I'll make you a deal. You turn your TOC into non-collapse and I'll give you two poutines, a painting of a chair, and an earth sample from Idaho. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Anna Frodesiak, lol what's wrong with my TOC being collapsed by default? It tends to get long very quickly, so I thought it would be more convenient for readers if it was out of the way by default. Do you feel differently? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) One step at a time Anna - not long ago Oshwah didn't even have a table of contents on their Talk! ;-) Mike1901 (talk) 12:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mike1901 - Why, did someone vandalize it? :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What? You didn't used to have a TOC at all? Anyhow, anything that makes me hone and click is not preferred by me, but others may think it's fine. No big deal mind you. And wow, such a busy usertalk. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Anna Frodesiak - I know it's just a preference; I was just teasing you :-). Yes, it is very busy here. I get a lot of messages and requests for help. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You do indeed get a lot of messages here. Soon you'll cause what's known in the biz as "serverfire", the result of which is glowing puddles of molten servers which in turn results in, what's know in the biz as "nerdpanic". :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese idol

I'm sorry to disturb you, but please also look at this: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Moscowconnection reported by User:MugiMafin (Result: ). I pinged you from there, but I'm not sure if it works from the Wikipedia namespace. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moscow Connection! Yup, it actually does work there; I got your ping as soon as you made it. All you need to do to ping a user is make a wikilink to their user space (or use those "ping" templates), sign the same edit, and make sure that the edit is not a minor one ;-). Great; I'll visit the thread and weigh in. And stop apologizing! You're more than welcome to bug me any time you need to! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grant Gustin Height

He is 6 ft 2 in that is the citation from IMDb. LadyThunder38 (talk) 14:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@LadyThunder38: IMDB is generally not a reliable source for that. The main appropriate uses for IMDB are MPAA ratings, WGA credits, and MAYBE cast lists / running times / etc. SQLQuery me! 15:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page "Vandalism"

Please don't warn people for vandalism for commenting on talk pages, and don't delete comments that aren't very clear vandalism. Cluelessness != vandalism. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SarekOfVulcan - I typically don't, unless its unambiguous. Where did you see that I've done that? I'd like to take a look. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SarekOfVulcan - Just got your revert notification -- I remember this. So, I thought this was a troll due to this message being similar to another user that was trolling. But looking back on this user's contributions, I can clearly see that this is just someone who is angry (and is probably just pushing a POV) but not the same person as the other user that was trolling. So, you're right; definitely not vandalism as you said. I apologize; I saw similar messages on other people's talk pages (that were trolls) that included incivility and out-right harassment, and I thought that this was one of them. For the record, I do know the difference between trolling and anger, frustration, and incompetence and they are not the same. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SarekOfVulcan - You bet, bud. Thank you for leaving me a message about this and for giving me a heads up about what I dun goofed at :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:27, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to return the favor anytime. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

recent deletion

good day sir, I was just looking to say that the page for oak knoll middle school was more of an abstract work of poetic license that is was meant to make you feel what happened at that school, and while it may have seemed untruthful and just full of memes, it was what the school was all about, so I was hoping thatyou would be willing to revert your change, if not to make a couple of children hoping to share there experienced at a school on an educational website — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMemeTeam (talkcontribs) 00:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My Apologies Kind Sir

I am still in the process of learning Mandarin... it appears I would still need some practice xD.

Thank you for your time.

-2601:801:280:54:84AB:F94E:EA14:E358 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:801:280:54:84AB:F94E:EA14:E358 (talk) 01:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh...

Thanks... Vensco (T | C) 01:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vensco - No problem! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO

You want me to NOT use opinion when that's all your series on Donald Trump is?? Not likely.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.248.6.15 (talk) 01:37, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion: The Outcasts (Brotherband)

[Sorry I screwed up and forgot to add a title] Hi Oshwah,

You recently (as in 2 minutes ago :p) reverted my edits to The Outcasts (Brotherband), indicating that it appeared to be a test of editing. However, I added correct punctuation that made the sentence structure grammatically correct. If there is something in particular that I did wrong, please tell me and I can correct that. However, some of the sentences simply did not make sense in that form so I added punctuation (commas, hyphens) that cleared it up. Also, there is a part in that page where there are two consecutive periods. It was there before my edits, but I only realized it now, and I don't want to change it myself as it may appear that I am ignoring your message by reverting my edits. Thanks and sorry! Markus1463 (talk) 01:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Markus1463! I know what happened! I struck the keyboard shortcut twice and accidentally reverted the edit (your change) after the one I intended to. I've restored your changes back to the article, and I apologize for the confusion. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do for you. Thanks for letting me know about this, and happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey User:Oshwah, No problem. Thanks for your very quick reply and thank you again for your work with Wikipedia - I can definitely see it's a lot of work! Have a good night. Markus1463 (talk) 01:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert of my contribution, "because did not appear constructive"

Information icon Hello, I'm Logicalgenius3. I wanted to let you know that I am going to revert one of your recent reverts of my contribution done by you, "because it did not appear constructive" of 01:22, 2 June 2016  —the one you made with this edit and the previous one to Art Nouveau— because your revert was not constructive and thus in violation of VAN (Blanking) and - subsequently - of OWN, as only an introductory knowledge of the subject would inform that my edits corrected many obvious errors and also added missing languages of countries significant to the subject to show the actual distribution of the terminology. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think you made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.--Logicalgenius3 (talk) 02:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you double-hit the revert button, or do you think the article should be kept? —C.Fred (talk) 02:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

C.Fred - It should be kept. Clearly a notable amazing person, and would blow GNG out of the water. Can't you see it?!! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see it now! Let me bookmark it (hits ctrl-opt-D on keyboard). :) —C.Fred (talk) 02:45, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, it looks like I reverted myself for... some reason... delete away. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
C.Fred - Tag restored. Also, you look like you might have some ducks on your tail in that article. Bring a catching net ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete?

You have recently deleted my page entitled "Ellie Volpe"and I would appreciate an explanation, thanks for your time! Qwerty10131888 (talk) 02:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any way i can get my page back and work on it for a little?Qwerty10131888 (talk) 03:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Qwerty10131888 - The reason that the article was deleted was because it met the criterion for speedy deletion of people, in that the article did not assert or discuss why the person was significant. Check out Wikipedia's guidelines on the notability of people and asserting a credible claim of significance; they will answer your questions and provide you with the information you need. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mark B N Hansen page

"Hi Oshwah,

I received your email in regards to reviewing my page before I publish it.

I am ready to publish it. Please let me know what you think.

Kindest, Samira"

Samira khalili naghadeh (talk) 04:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Samira khalili naghadeh - I have added the necessary template to the top of the article. Someone will review it soon, and either publish it for you or decline and explain why. Please let me know if I can do anything else for you. Happy editing, and welcome to Wikipedia! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

nancy dow

the change is directly quoted from the very same source already referenced at the end of the sentence where it is inserted. Please avoid jumping the gun before actually checking the available source following a revision. I wil now revert your trigger-happy reversion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:CDA0:9220:9DFE:7F48:99F9:2558 (talk) 06:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the Godfather

You need to realize that the godfather is a piece of crap no matter what you say. i dont care what anybody else thinks, but i do know one thing: You need to allow people to make edits on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maverick 2017 (talkcontribs) 06:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I Have added content , But it was removed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chennai_Institute_of_Technology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chennai_Institute_of_Technology  ; The Content which I added was true and the reference for proof is website www.citmechatronics.hol.es. It was developed by B.Bharath Kumar Reddy , Department of Mechatronics Engineering , Cit Chennai. Please add the content as it exists.Even the app is working and there are users for the app.

Thank You

--117.217.176.97 (talk) 07:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC) B.Bharath Kumar Reddy[reply]

The content you added has nothing to do with the college self. If the app has notability, it should have its own article, not significant content on another article to the point that the article becomes mostly about something else. If you have any questions, please let me know. I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

afm

Hi,

I wanted to add also the 25-pounder gun on the page that is all

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.71.189.186 (talk) 07:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't close unblock requests

Oshwah, you are not an admin, so please don't respond to unblock requests. Let the administrator do it. And also, WP:DENY applies to Supreme Genghis Khan. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 08:45, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TheCoffeeAddict, I've been told by a couple administrators that my declining of unblock requests in clear cases is okay with them. Our administrators are very backlogged at times, and I'd rather SNOW those so that they don't waste their precious time towards things such as this. However, I will say that in this very case, the unblock request should have just been reverted instead of declined (per WP:DENY). ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hellooooo please review the grammar and content of NICHIREN SHOSHU as both informational sides are shared to avoid bias. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:218A:2D00:6814:3767:333B:D158 (talk) 08:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


QUESTİON

hello, can you help me to create/write article about company? Maybe something I'm doing wrong, every time my article deleted.Kompaniya (talk) 11:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).[reply]

@Kompaniya: (talk page stalker) Have you read the information provided to you on your talk page? -- samtar talk or stalk 12:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kuala Lumpur

How could that is not a spam? 128.90.59.252 (talk) 12:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)@128.90.59.252: Just wondering how you think what you removed is spam. -NottNott|talk Reply with {{re}} 12:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Sorry I think I made mistake. I also want to ask you. Can you create a profile for one of business person in Bulgaria ?

Regards David

Lisa Sparxxx

It wasn't a mistake. Can you change it back? It's relevant to the person and the article and was in the intro for many years until removed by a user claiming to be Sparxxx. They were not and took every opportunity to stop anyone editing "their" page. I definitely think it's a fact worth being in the intro as it shows why this particular person is well-known. It's, well, encyclopedic. 2601:204:C203:9240:90EF:93E0:17F8:7244 (talk) 12:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I should also point out that fact I added is IN the article later. But it should be in the intro as again, it's why this individual is noteworthy. 2601:204:C203:9240:90EF:93E0:17F8:7244 (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it is sourced later in the article. Intros are for noteworthy accomplishments, titles, etc. This would be all of that. It's completely constructive. 2601:204:C203:9240:90EF:93E0:17F8:7244 (talk) 13:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Sorry about that! I verified that it is, indeed, mentioned and referenced in the article. I've restored your changes. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Much appreciated. 2601:204:C203:9240:90EF:93E0:17F8:7244 (talk) 13:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Can you create a article for wikipedia for one of my celebrity friend? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don David Wineberg (talkcontribs) 13:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No subject

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 2602:306:3357:BA0:532:B317:DB4F:1390 (talk) 13:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[Yes I did]. I was declining a speedy deletion tag for an article that was not eligible to be deleted under the criterion it was tagged for. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong rename of the species

"Hi Oshwah, There is no dolphin species like "South Asian River Dolphin". It is very misleading and a misinformation, originally the species is named "Gangetic river dolphin" with scientific name "Platanista gangetica". I know you have made it intentionally. Thank you"111.93.163.126 (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please review recent WP:AIV report

The helper-bot cleaned things up too hastily! I’d like you to reconsider my recent report [1] regarding XtraTacoman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). You said “edits are not vandalism”, but I ask that you review the diffs for all four contributions. The one with the edit summary “noticed a spelling error of alan turing” is indeed a correction, but of their previous edit to change “Turing” to “Tubing”. The other two edits add “Hey there Danny ;)”, and change “Turing” to “Turtwig”. I see an editor that is WP:NOTHERE. Thanks if you can take the time to reconsider. Cheers. Willondon (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I thought you had admin rights. What I've done is just resubmitted the report. I hope you agree that it shouldn't be flagged as "edits are not vandalism". Cheers. Willondon (talk) 14:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Willondon! You know, now that I look at it again, I should have used a different response template or not have placed one on your report at all. I apologize; I perhaps thought that the user was simply edit testing a random word, but I clearly see now that this was not the case. I appreciate you for bringing this to my attention; this helps me to keep alert and diligent with each of my responses, reverts, warnings, etc and to not let my guard down as far as being careful. It's very easy to cross the line and into the mode of going too fast and not giving each recent change the careful review that it deserves. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Blocker..

well Now I haven't any idea what link I would add.. perhaps talking to me before You delete it would be more helpful. what exactly was the content I added ? did u save a copy or just delete it ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oldtimer61 (talkcontribs)

Thanks for your input.

Have been asked to update our company site (someone else started it, but now information is out of date and the logo needs updating and I've been asked to update it). I'm new to all of this so didn't realize I'd done anything irregular. The original login details are "lost" so we created a new login (it's been a while since the page was set up). Thanks for flagging - will keep an eye on this going forward. SantoroMKTG (talk) 15:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Message to John Hobson

You just sent me a message:

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ALGOL, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

You may have noticed that I had a link to the Wikipedia page on the star "Algol" in the change that I made to the programming language article. Do you accept Wikipedia as a reliable source? JHobson3 (talk) 18:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(page stalker) No, Wikipedia isn't considered a reliable source for Wikipedia, because that would mean WP is vouching for itself. It seems strange, but if you want Wikipedia to be regarded by readers as reliable, Wikipedia has to reject itself as a reliable source. Willondon (talk) 19:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
JHobson3 - Adding onto Willondon's response: You'll want to Willondon's response, you should check out the Wikipedia essay Wikipedia is not a reliable source; it also explains why we do not reference other Wikipedia articles as sources. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi you seem like a nice guy. 47.20.214.217 (talk) 21:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question

In the past I vandalized a lot and was very rude on Wikipedia. I have a question. I was blo led for three months and the block ended today. Before I vandalized a lot and I mean a lot. Now I want to change and build an encyclopedia. I want to redeem my ways and turn myself around. My question is "am I allowed to keep editing?" Do I now have to stop editing from Wikipedia. You are probably thinking, "Why should I believe him?" Please Oshwah. Please trust me. I SWEAR I will never vandalize again. Please get back to me A.S.A.P and tell me if I can edit constructive again. I will respect your decision no matter what. Sincerely, 47.20.214.217 (talk) 21:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(page stalker) I don’t know if you can edit constructively now, but you’re free to try with the IP 47.20.214.217. It’s not a personal thing, Wikipedia admins just block IP addresses where needed to prevent vandalism. That IP is unblocked now, Wikipedia keeps rolling along, and if there’s a problem in the future, history will just repeat itself. Have at ‘er, and good luck. Willondon (talk) 21:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LeperKhanz Page

Hey! I'm closely related to the band. I'm trying to clean the page up, add in relevant info, update things that are out of date, and also move some of the text to better match chronology.

Please give me a chance to finish editing it before you revert all my changes!

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.216.245.27 (talk) 01:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Typo

P.s. The word I said that you probably can't read is blocked47.20.214.217 (talk) 21:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 2 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article from my watchlist that's getting problematic and I won't be able to react seasonably

Kindly see Rosalind Brewer. A range of dynamic long IP addresses were on a spree of WP:SOAPBOXery a while back and forgot about it, and I think they popped up again about an hour ago. I honestly haven't thought about whether there's sockpuppetry here because this has been on, you know, my "non-top-of-mind" watchlist subset. But I'm going to be out of easy vandalism-fighting hardware equipage for a few days, and I fear this is the beginning of another preoccupied salvo. Could you please keep your good watchful eye on this, and/or spread the word among your comparable compadres? (For the record, I haven't set foot in a Walmart in over 20 years, but if I had ever borne a daughter she would very likely have been named "Rosalind," and this is why Wikipedia needs INFP editors along with the INTJs...) Thanks, O.! Stay cool! Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Julietdeltalima - I'm more than happy to step in and keep a fresh pair of neutral eyes on this article. Looking at the history page, there has definitely been some problematic edits in the past (many of which that I, actually, reverted... haha). Things appear to be somewhat under control right now, but I'll be happy to keep watch for you. It sounds like you're going to be traveling. If so, have a safe travel and I hope it because you're doing something fun or good. I'll see you when you get back! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Julietdeltalima - Oh, and I also went ahead and warned the IP who added the content you just reverted there. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Much obliged! not sure how I missed that! I'm going to be hanging for 48 hours with a bunch of dear folks I haven't been in the same place with in 25 years and hope any Wikipedia time from here through Monday is purely for aide-memoire purposes regarding blissfully bygone popular history! Take care! - Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How do i delete a page i created??

Hi, How do i delete a page that i created??

Thanks, Jdmdk (talk) 01:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jdmdk - What page do you want deleted? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yun Bo Zhang. Jdmdk (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Jdmdk - The article has been tagged for removal. An administrator will get to it soon. Hang tight. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!! Jdmdk (talk) 01:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You bet! Happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding sold out dates to MMXVI World tour.

Hello Oshwah. I was adding information to Wikipedia regarding sold out shows on the MMXVI world tour page, but you told me my post wasn't constructive. I have references, they are news sources such as www.cincinatti.com (regarding the ticket sales of their Cincinnati performance). There are many holes in the ticket sales column of the tour dates box. It would be nice to flesh this out with the info. What exactly is the problem here? Thanks!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.76.154 (talk) 02:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oshwah!

Thank you for the response! I changed movie's title, cause creators took it from bible's quotes (I think from Ephesians Chapter 5:20-33) (Original quote in Greek "ἡ δὲ γυνὴ ἵνα φοβῆται τὸν ἄνδρα") I search the original bible's quote and it is "but the woman should revere her husband". Said woman, not wife. Also word "And" at the begging fails to ascribe the exact meaning of the quote! Not important detail though. I tried to make a little improvement to the article. Excuse moi, I am not an advance editor yet! Thanks again for your response. pouspoul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pouspoul (talkcontribs) 02:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pouspoul! This looks like something you should discuss on the article's talk page and have other editors review and collaborate with you about. Please let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing -- ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Elizabeth Holmes

The removal of networth from infobox was discussed on the talk page. Please do not blindly revert edits without discussing first. Galestar (talk) 03:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Galestar - You didn't leave an edit summary that described the consensus or the discussion. You just said "removing this" and did not state why. In the future, if you leave complete edit summaries, it will avoid confusion such as this with other editors. Thank you for understanding the reason behind my reversion, and have a nice day! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to police edits on an article, you need to read the Talk page. Full stop. Galestar (talk)

Removal of false information

"In 1971, Nizami was chief of infamous Al-Badr militia.[20] Along with Pakistan army, this militia prepared a plan to abduct and kill Bengali intellectuals. They have massacred lots of professors, journalists, litterateurs, doctors and pro-liberation people.[21][22]"

Hello I removed the above few misleading lines from the page of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motiur_Rahman_Nizami. Because the information is wrong. There was obviously a military-led group called Al Badr. But Nizami was not the chief of this organization. Nizami was a non-military person and leader of a student organization. The people those who blame this against him are doing falsely just for political reasons. Those are not true at all. Then why should this wrong information exist in Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johirbuet (talkcontribs) 03:16, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i saw your reverts there. What is going on there? Also, is it ok to copy paste material from other articles? TheDwellerCamp (talk) 03:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TheDwellerCamp - I'm reverting his removal of content, and I think he's confused and believes that his reversion of my changes is also removing the content... I think? I'm super confused as well when I look at his edit summaries... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think he should keep his account logged in right now. Its incredibly obvious that he uses that IPv6 address, which goes to Los Angeles. TheDwellerCamp (talk) 03:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
TheDwellerCamp - Hey, as long as his edits are good and he's trying to build an article, I'm a totally happy man. His edit summaries just threw me off. Even after I reverted myself thinking oh, it's probably just huge re-construction, maybe. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, i'll revert my own edit to that article. Lets see how it goes ok? TheDwellerCamp (talk) 03:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
TheDwellerCamp - Sure, do it up my fiend :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oshwah, i'll give it a week. and review it later. Although, the copying from articles kind of bothers me. Is there some kid of rule against that?TheDwellerCamp (talk) 04:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
TheDwellerCamp - No, there isn't a rule against re-using things. So long as it's relevant to the article you're re-using content from, and that the article isn't similar to the other. Obviously it depends, and there are exceptions either way. But good faith re-use doesn't strike me as something deeply concerning, no. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
of course, good faith. In that case, I'll just be happy with the edits then. TheDwellerCamp (talk) 04:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is the styling of dates?

Im writing this when i noticed List of conflicts in Angola. For example in the section of List of conflicts in Angola#Kingdom of Kongo, there is excessive use of C.E., which is common era. This would suggest an academic background with regards to history-related fields. Would that be necessary? TheDwellerCamp (talk) 04:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Top Gear Controversies

Hello Oshwah,

I'm replying to you regarding the reversion of my edit to the Top Gear Controversies page. I had changed "on account of" to "for the fact that it was." Although "on account of" is a common idiom, it didn't sound right to me in the context of an encyclopedic article. I am unclear, however, on how the change in wording affected the page's neutrality. The edit may have changed the flow of the sentence slightly, but it did not change the sentence's meaning or introduce any bias.

Could you explain your decision in more detail?


Thanks,

R.J. Lupin 65.78.104.22 (talk) 05:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Silattur Wikipedia page edit

I belong to Silattur I edited the one related to Silattur . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brahadeesh.k (talkcontribs) 05:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OshwAh

My edits were appropriate regarding Silattur I don't know why reverted back

I wanted to contribute a lot regarding many places in India, Srilanka and NEPAL. But I was upset that my edit is not accepted.bye — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brahadeesh.k (talkcontribs) 05:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hemu's Samadhi Sthal

I did not remove any matter from the page, only added some new information which is true and relevent to the page. Please put it again.27.7.196.248 (talk) 07:48, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

You are fast TheDwellerCamp (talk) 04:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi TheDwellerCamp! Thanks for the beer! I'll buy the next round! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HG reversion

Hey Oshwah, (REDACTED) is me doing some half-asleep reading and attempting to copyedit. I admit that it isn't the most stellar copyediting, but all I did was rearrange some words. Nothing was added or subtracted. Please be careful with HG! Best, Airplaneman 06:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Airplaneman - Let me re-read the sentence. I was pretty sure that I checked for that... I guess not! :-P ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hemu

My edits on Hemu's Smadhi Sthal and Hemu are not controvercial by any means. There were two chapters on 'Encrochments', so I removed one. Did not remove any thing else. On Hemu page, the entire quotaion is from author 'Jadu Nath sarkar' and is available online. i do not think there is any controversy there. Some one removed two paras, though citation is there.27.7.196.248 (talk) 07:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page reversion an actual mistake.

You actually did make a mistake, the page might not have appeared constructive, but it had true statements, it just needed more accuracy and updates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.249.199 (talk) 07:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boxing families

Oshwah: I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of boxing families with this edit, without adequately explaining why.

I didn't remove it, I moved it to the American boxing families section, as they're an American boxing family and not a Mexican one.96.27.24.254 (talk) 09:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Praktan

Adrija I am very upset with you oswah.Who are you to poke your nose and cut of my editing?Wait!I will report your behaviour.--116.193.136.78 (talk) 09:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)--116.193.136.78 (talk) 09:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(page stalker) I assume you refer to this edit here. [2] Wikipedia is a group effort, and there’s no need for special qualifications to edit it. Please see the article at Wikipedia:Ownership of content. You, me and he all have equal access to making changes. Oshwah didn’t explain in his edit summary, but I would have reverted it as “not an improvement”. The phrase “tells her slangs” doesn’t mean anything to me, a native speaker of English, and I don’t know the word “culcrate”, although if it is actually a word, it is surely conjugated as “he culcrates her”. In short, the language can’t be understood as English, and it doesn’t improve the article. That may be a hard blow to the ego, but you’ll find the ego is the first thing that needs to go if you’re going to have a pleasant and productive time editing Wikipedia. Please don’t take things personally. Cheers. Willondon (talk) 19:15, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

System configuration guess

Let me guess... You have a $50k LN2 cooled gaming system and have an apartment on top of the Wikipedia servers? Oh, and are 14 years old (fastest click in the west). Jim1138 (talk) 09:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim1138 - I'm 27, but you were close though! ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The twin using the Atari 1040 ST was 27 years old, but when the other twin returned from using the $50k LN2 cooled gaming system, it was like they’d only aged 14 years. Willondon (talk) 02:40, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to Edit a Page

"Hi Oshwah, I am Kevin Harding the Brand and Merchandising Director at Strathberry (kevin@strathberry.com / strathberry.com). I am trying to edit our Wikipedia Page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strathberry_of_Scotland) as it is very old and gives incorrect information. Unfortunatley the page was created by a former employee and there is no way of obtaining the login details under which the page was created. Please let me know how I can edit it or archieve it so that it is not searchable and I will create a new one. Many thanks, Kevin." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.103.248 (talk) 09:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Weiner

Why did you delete my edit? Anthony Weiner is a disgraced former politician. He was involved in two sexting scandals, one which led to his resignation from Congress, the other which led him to lose the 2013 New York City mayoral race. His career in politics is over. fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mixitcat (talkcontribs) 10:15, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

can you read?

His true birthday is September 8, 1930. I found a witness to his live birth . She is 99 years old and was in the house when he was born. I just removed all that garbage about his birth being unknown. As it is important now that Ali has died as people may have an interest in Liston for a while. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.18.55.90 (talk) 12:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@184.18.55.90: can you link me to a reliable source citing that birthdate please? SQLQuery me! 19:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(page stalker) I assume you're referring to this edit here [3]. You'll want to read the article at Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. The content you removed cites various sources regarding the unknown birth date. You replaced it with a claim that might be 100% true, but it isn't verified by published secondary sources. It can be very annoying when you know what the truth is, but Wikipedia can't include it. Wikipedia sacrifices 100% truth in favour of knowledge that can at least be traced to reliable sources. Your witness to Liston's birth would be very interesting to an historian interested in his biography, someone who publishes research on the topic. Wikipedia just isn't set up to handle original research, so it relies on reporting what other people say, who have gone to the trouble of checking facts and building a reputation for reliability. I'm sorry that you'll likely be disappointed in this explanation of Wikipedia, but like the sea monkeys, it's not quite as awesome as it looks in the ad. Willondon (talk) 19:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Matthews (American football)

I'm reverting your edits, because you and Kevboy11 deleted valid content to put information about a person with no references at all, that is named Kevin Matthew (Not even Kevin Matthews) and that plays soccer not American football. If you want to keep your information, you can create an article name Kevin Matthew and put it there.Makers267 (talk) 16:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Makers267: Looking at that page's history, Kevboy11 was the one who inserted the false information. When an IP editor went to remove that false info, they didn't re-insert the correct info at the same time, and Oshwah reverted the IP because it apparently looked to him like the IP was simply removing valid info without a good reason. I don't think Oshwah was aware that the page had previously been vandalized before he reverted the IP's removal of info. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 17:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Makers267, A guy saved by Jesus - Yes, it appears that vandalism was added earlier. I was just confused with the removal due to the lack of an edit summary. Thanks to you both for catching this and letting me know. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Bowers

I recommend that this article be deleted. With due respect to Joe Bowers, he's notable only for being the first man to try and escape from Alcatraz, and that doesn't warrant a separate article. I recommend that it could be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.56.213 (talk) 11:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the UK Kennedy/Lincoln/Titanic IP, who also has a fixation on Alcatraz. No opinion on whether they're correct about deletion. Acroterion (talk) 11:53, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Why you deleting my page.

WTF man — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZaynMoosa (talkcontribs) 00:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Leaky Gut Syndrome

Osway--I am attempting to edit the Leaky Gut Syndrome page because the original author is biased, and is not presenting a balanced view. Just because this doesn't fit traditional medical opinion does not mean that it is "psuedoscience". Alternative medicine is not psuedoscience. If you're saying that I'm the one making it MORE biased, you really need to look at and understand the original writer's work.

If this is what happens in my first edit on Wikipedia, I will never contribute again.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/03/27/new-research-shows-poorly-understood-leaky-gut-syndrome-is-real-may-be-the-cause-of-several-diseases.html

Les5889 (talk) 01:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Les5889 (talkcontribs) 01:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(page stalker) The original author/writer has no special privilege with the article. What you are seeing is the result of collaborative effort from many editors. This link [4] will show you the history of editing. It's a shame to see a first edit rebuffed, and the editor get frustrated, because Wikipedia is always looking for good editors. Unfortunately, it can be a tough slog for a new editor to learn the ropes, and have their edits stick. If you're up for the challenge, the best tip I can give you is that successful edits come from discussions on the talk page. The talk page for Leaky gut syndrome is the recognized place for all of us to hash out disagreements about the article content. Cheers. Willondon (talk) 01:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Willondon. If there are disagreements or if you believe that there are issues with bias or misinformation currently on the article, you should discuss this on the article's talk page. This will start a discussion about the article and give other editors the ability to look into your thoughts and contribute to them. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leaky Gut Sydrome

Oswah--Never mind, I am not going to fight to try to edit that article; you've already decided it's psuedoscience, and you've got the power. What's the point? Even Wikipedia recognizes that Wikipedia is biased. Enjoy having a slated, biased, traditional medicine article in place that was written by some grouchy doctor with a bone to pick. Not my job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Les5889 (talkcontribs) 01:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do wrong

I'm new and just wanted to add my page to the list of security company's in the USA. I'm going to work on my page tomorrow. When I get to a pc Thanks Brandon whalen Whalen1126 (talk) 01:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki page for Mahmud al-Muntasir

Hello,

I recently attempted to edit/contribute a line of information on to the Mahmud al-Muntasir (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmud_al-Muntasir) Wiki page. The addition read: "He is the great-grandfather of American Journalist Mola Lenghi." The edit was denied because it was not sourced. Understandable. I am Mola Lenghi. Mahmud al-Muntasir was my great-grandfather. His daughter, Souad al-Muntasir married my grandfather Abdelmawla Lenghi. Their son, Issam Lenghi, is my father. Perhaps not ideal but I am a first-hand source. Does this meet your criteria?

Thank you for considering and for properly maintaining what is a very important page to me and my family.

Mola Lenghi Leeebeee123 (talk) 01:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit - General Stores and Mold Loft Building-Harriman Yard of the Merchant Shipbuilding Corporation

I replaced the location coordinates which have no citation and are obviously incorrect. They point to Temple University in North Philly. The location in Bristol PA is common local knowledge and needs no citation. The correct address is already cited twice in the article and cited in the NHRP link. Please restore the correct data.

Content disputes can't be vandalism?

Wikipedia:Vandalism#Hoaxing vandalism Mdrnpndr (talk) 02:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mdrnpndr! I was looking for blatant vandalism, but if you believe the content-related edits to be blatant hoaxes, then what I'll do is remove my response, as I don't want to add to a discussion about something that should probably just be looked into by an administrator. Thanks for leaving me a message regarding my response. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I responded to an identical concern at Talk:Willondon#Content disputes can't be vandalism? Willondon (talk) 03:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From 72.197.170.8 (get your own section header, stray cat, says page stalker)

Meow? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.197.170.8 (talk) 03:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Those edits were not false (even the one I made in demographics, which I was going to delete in a few seconds.) I know this because I am a student in seventh grade PRISM as of the 2015-2016 school year. Derpfacedoge (talk) 03:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Derpfacedoge[reply]

please stop being mean to me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisdolcimascolo72 (talkcontribs) 03:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hello O. I am very appreciative of your post at ANI and on my talk page. I'm afraid that the "please comment on harassment" banner at the top of our watchlist the last few days has broght up some old (and even present) feelings about the PA's that happens to us old timers from time to time. I totally apologize for my reaction (over) to your post. Thanks for taking the time to clarify things. MarnetteD|Talk 04:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MarnetteD! Of course, and no apologies needed! I'm just glad that we talked and that we were able to shake hands and make sure that we were on the same page together. It's too often that people refuse to do something as simple as that; we both have seen our fair share of it over the many years we've been here. Take care, my friend. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Taylor Lianne Chandler

Sarahj2107 deleted Taylor Lianne Chandler based on false information on the page from vandalism. The photo from an appearance on Howard Stern was deleted in the same manner. In the history you will see the page was repeatedly vandalized and protected numerous times. The reason for deletion is false and could have been easily verified through the original content on the page and verified citations. Please restore my page to its content before the vandalism and add back the photo that was deleted and protect my page yet again. Not sure why Sarahj2107 did this. Please help me. I'm verified across social media as a public person www.facebook.com/TaylorLianneChandler Been in numerous magazines newspapers and tv to this day. Written two books, I'm a COVERGIRL, adult film star and advocate for Intersex and gender rights speaking around the country. The original page citations were verified repeatedly due to vandalism. My page was constantly being protected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8806:2204:D800:4D28:43EF:E258:8A86 (talk) 06:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OSWAH DONT UNDO MY EDIT ON THE JESUS ON ISLAM PAGE LET THAT CONTENT REMAIN REMOVED TILL THE PROPBLEM IS SORTED OUT THEN IT CAN BE PUT BACK IF THE CONTENT IS VALID

OSWAH DONT UNDO MY EDIT ON THE JESUS ON ISLAM PAGE LET THAT CONTENT REMAIN REMOVED TILL THE PROPBLEM IS SORTED OUT THEN IT CAN BE PUT BACK IF THE CONTENT IS VALID IM TALKING TO THE EDITOR THAT PUT IT THERE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.40.16.15 (talk) 05:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Woah now IP, let's just keep it cool and calm and I'm certain Oshwah will help you understand what is going on -- samtar talk or stalk 07:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That being said, IP has been blocked for block evasion -- samtar talk or stalk 07:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

why i removed content

look this article on the Jesus in Islam is something to do with religon and this is not something you can just play with lots of content like the story of Jesus and the Jew etc has been added and its reliability is not given we can't misguide others we need to be 100% sure were right so if we keep adding stuff without checking or explaining it then we can misguide others I DONT WANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT JUST CHECK THE NEW INFORMATION THAT IS WHAT I AM ASKING. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.40.16.15 (talkcontribs)

Mullan/Legal

    :Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives; the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment. This policy applies to any living person mentioned in a BLP, whether or not that person is the subject of the article, and to material about living persons in other articles and on other pages, including talk pages.[3]. The mentioning of a civil lawsuit to which Mullan was not a party, and only a witness, falls into the category of "titillating claim", regardless of a written court "opinion. Deleting that content was being nice, given the contributions the man has made to human kind. You trying to insure that the content remains is not nice.  (ice2016)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ice2016 (talkcontribs) 11:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply] 

Incoming!

Hello, Oshwah. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Mike1901 (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike1901! I received your email! I haven't read it yet (I'm currently at the office), but I will read it today and get back to you. Thanks for the message, and I'll speak with you soon! Cheers -- ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Hi i'm kinda new to this stuff :/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninjakrom (talkcontribs) 14:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No subject

Hi Oshwah,

I am Glad to interact with an expert like you .I am a new editor to wikipedia and was trying to publish a new article with URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nyalakonda_Ramkishan_Rao. it was denied once and I have re submitted it . If you don't mind can you please review the article and let me know for any further changes to be made .Please take this as my personal request and guide me .

Thanks & Regards , vamshi Krishna

(Vamshi.areddy (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC))[reply]

No subject

Sorry. I think it's not good to reveal the whole story of the movie a mere weeks before its release, so I want it deleted till the release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.120.147.48 (talk) 00:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that's not how Wikipedia works. Removing something because you don't like it is not a valid reason for removing content. Please do not continue to do this, as it is considered disruptive. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No subject

I removed the reference because it was out of context and irrelevant to the section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waterfall mg (talkcontribs) 01:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hello

I would like to tell u that the info I put in was correct. I hope u change it soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.27.200.239 (talk) 01:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adlene Guedioura height

Dear Oshwah,

You have (automatically?) reverted my change about the height of soccer player Adlene Guedioura. He is in no way 1.86m (even though he/someone has recently managed to include that into "official" statistics).

Actually, many sources credit him as being 1.78m (https://www.google.com/search?q=1.78m%20%22guedioura%22&start=0&rct=j).

To prove my point, I can show you this picture: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/02/07/256F719400000578-2943890-image-a-104_1423329569272.jpg where Guedioura is clearly smaller than Wilfried Zaha (who's 1.80m).

What should I do to have my change accepted?

Yours sincerely,

Actarus2805 (talk) 02:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Actarus2805. The reason I reverted your change was because it removed a reference and replaced the person's height without citing a reference. If you want to change something like this on a biography of a living person, you need to cite a reference that is reliable. Please let me know if you have questions regarding the Wikipedia guidelines I provided you here. I'll be happy to answer them. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs)

No subject

Not sure what the issue is on the Clinton Sexual Misconduct Allegations articles. I just added a reference to his affair with Jennifer Flowers, which is well-sourced. Adultery is a type of sexual misconduct. For example, it is a criminal offense in 20 some states and is a grounds for divorce in almost all states. How could this be NOT CONSTRUCTIVE? In addition, an Allegation exists in two states. There is an an unproved allegation and a Proved allegation. Flowers is a Proven allegation. Also, this discussion should be part of the Talk on the Article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.56.194.3 (talk) 02:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for leaving me a message! After looking through your content addition again, I decided to go ahead and restore your changes, since they do appear referenced at first glance. I apologize for the confusion. Thank you for letting me know about this, and I wish you happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No subject

Hey can I edit this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryans19087651 (talkcontribs) 02:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ryans19087651 - Yup! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey why did you edit that back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryans19087651 (talkcontribs) 02:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was for real

dear oshwah. I made and edit on the John Laurens page as a fun fact. And it was true. He did like to draw turtles. The point of it was that not many people know that and think they should.HamiltonIsLife (talk) 03:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oshwah -

In the Allan Quatermain entry, a citation was requested about the name Quatermain often being misspelled and I gave a perfectly fine one. That was a few days ago. Today it has been removed. That does not bode well for my recent important well-cited entries noting how Uncle Scrooge was a precursor of Indiana Jones. I decided that rather than wait on the edge of my seat waiting for some editor to remove those remarks, I decided to remove them myself. Also the same thing goes for the list of Indiana Jones ---Novelizations and Novels--- that I also added. No doubt some editor would come along and say the list is redundant of Indiana Jones franchise. Bottom line: I do not have the temperment to be a Wikipedia contributor. Best Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.100.33.118 (talk) 04:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WTH

DUDE WTH I SPENT SO MUCH TIME WHO EVEN CARES ABOUT REECE OXFORD