Talk:Belmont Stakes: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:01, 9 June 2016

Horse racing B‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Long Island B‑class Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Long Island, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Untitled

The record for attendance for the Belmont Stakes was set in 2004 when Birdstone upset Smarty Jones to deny him the Triple Crown. I don't have the exact figure, but it was 120,000+. thank you buddwd Buddwd (talk) 21:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to the official Belmont site, distances varied from 1 1/8 miles to 1 3/8 miles until 1926 when it was set at the now standard 1 1/2 miles. I didn't want to edit the page until someone else rechecked my figures. Thanks -- Vclift

I think that the Belmont is held three weeks after the Preakness, which is usually the second Saturday in June, but sometimes the first.

Date of running would be useful. --squadfifteen

According to Dorothy Ours' research for her book on Man o' Roar, the Belmont Stakes at one time was raced in a fishook pattern, styled after the European Classic races. The actual start of the race was on the training track (the one mile track adjacent and perpendicular to the main track). The special course curved around the training track and then joined the main track for a long straight run to the special finish line, which differed from the regular finish line. (Man o' War. Dorothy Ours, St. Martin's Press, New York, ISBN: 0-312-34099-0,. page 12) I would love to add this to the Belmont Stakes article, but I don't know how long they used this course for the running of the race or when it started and when it ended. Anyway, if someone has time to find out more, it might be an interesting addition. Thanks! -- Kraynak

Fillies

How many fillies have won the Belmont Stakes? And how many have ever run? I think that would be interesting to know. -fan 23:50, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Only three fillies have ever won the Belmont Stakes: Ruthless in 1867, Tanya in 1905, and Rags to Riches in 2007. (JosephASpadaro 02:54, 10 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

It should be noted that between Tanya and Rags to Riches only 5 fillies tried, so this whole "Incredible, a filly winning the Belmont!" thing is a media story blown way out of proportion. 3-y-o fillies just very seldomly compete against colts because there are enough rich filly races. Malc82 09:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found source showing the total number of filly entrants (only 23), so added a comment on the respectable win percentage when enteredJlvsclrk (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Random

The table should be modified to show the distance run for that specific race. Currently, if you sort by time, you'll get misleading results, you'll think the fastest horses were bred before 1925. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.238.49.65 (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

resolved a while backJlvsclrk (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Error in main page on Belmont Stakes. (copied below) Colonial Affair did not win the Triple Crown.

resolved a while backJlvsclrk (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other records Only James G. Rowe, Sr. and George M. Odom have won the Belmont Stakes as both jockey and trainer.

added a while backJlvsclrk (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On June 5, 1993 thoroughbred racing's all-time leading female jockey, Julie Krone, became the first woman to win a Triple Crown race when she rode to victory in the Belmont Stakes aboard Colonial Affair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.4.94 (talk) 15:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

added a while backJlvsclrk (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fillies: Number of Belmont Races and Number of Kentucky Derby Races

As of this date, there have been 144 races of the Belmont Stakes and 138 Kentucky Derby races. See the official site http://www.belmontstakes.com/ for how many times the Belmont has been run and http://www.kentuckyderby.com/ for how many times the Kentucky Derby has been won. These statistics were incorrect so I fixed them. Missyagogo (talk) 05:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How?

How can Big Brown be listed as 2008 winner before the race has even been run?

How? Because this is "the encylopedia that any moron can edit." That's how. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 22:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Records

Thereis no mention (in the narrative) ofMan o' War's apparently unbroken record (for the distance that was run in those days). Kdammers (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Man o' War's track record set in the Belmont for 13⁄8 mile was eventually broken. He does still hold the 15⁄8 mile record set in the Lawrence Realization https://www.nyra.com/belmont/records/

Color of Belmont winners

I added a trivia bit about the color of the winners because I thought it was a fun fact. The source did not specify who was what, but I've identified that Belmar and Native Dancer were the greys, and High Echelon was the roan. Should I add a note to this effect? A lot of people find grey horses irresistible! Jlvsclrk (talk) 18:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will note that the Jockey club is clueless about modern genetics and that the "roan" was probably a gray, so I'd use the current "gray or roan" from the registry. Also, they now say "Bay or Brown" so I'd put those side by side too. Perhaps Like this: "Bay or Brown (X# Bay, X# Brown)" I know this is absurdly anal-retentive, but the reality is that true roan (horse) actually doesn't exist in Thoroughbreds (or Arabians). The Jockey Club is not willing to admit this yet, but... Montanabw^(talk) 19:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Montanabw, I actually thought the same when I saw that roan, not to mention the blacks. So I'll group the roan with grey, the black with dark bay/brown. Should I add a note about this on the page for anyone who checks against the source? (The grey/roan will be obvious, the change to the blacks, not so much).

Revision as of 19:26, 8 June 2016 edit Montanabw (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 105,437 edits →Color of Belmont winners: Color-genetics-antl-retentiveness-geekery ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:01, 9 June 2016 edit undo Jlvsclrk (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 9,362 edits →Color of Belmont winners Next edit →
Line 51:		Line 51:

	:I will note that the Jockey club is clueless about modern genetics and that the "roan" was probably a gray, so I'd use the current "gray or roan" from the registry. Also, they now say "Bay or Brown" so I'd put those side by side too. Perhaps Like this: "Bay or Brown (X# Bay, X# Brown)" I know this is absurdly anal-retentive, but the reality is that true [[roan (horse)]] actually doesn't exist in Thoroughbreds (or Arabians). The Jockey Club is not willing to admit this yet, but... [[User:Montanabw\|<font color="blue">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw\|<font color="orange">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 19:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)		:I will note that the Jockey club is clueless about modern genetics and that the "roan" was probably a gray, so I'd use the current "gray or roan" from the registry. Also, they now say "Bay or Brown" so I'd put those side by side too. Perhaps Like this: "Bay or Brown (X# Bay, X# Brown)" I know this is absurdly anal-retentive, but the reality is that true [[roan (horse)]] actually doesn't exist in Thoroughbreds (or Arabians). The Jockey Club is not willing to admit this yet, but... [[User:Montanabw\|<font color="blue">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw\|<font color="orange">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 19:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

			::Thanks [[User:Montanabw]], I actually thought the same when I saw that roan, not to mention the blacks. So I'll group the roan with grey, the black with dark bay/brown. Should I add a note about this on the page for anyone who checks against the source? (The grey/roan will be obvious, the change to the blacks, not so much).