Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandra Silva: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:36, 14 June 2016

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The discussion is leaning toward deletion, but the "no indication of notability" delete !vote is ambiguous in terms of whether or not it is based only upon the state of sourcing in the article, which is not an indicator of whether or not a subject is notable, or if additional source searches were performed to qualify the stance. The weak keep !vote provides some evidence to substantiate the rationale. Ultimately, no consensus for a particular action exists relative to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and the strengths of the overall arguments herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandra Silva

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing at all actually solidly pinning applicable notability here and my searches clearly found nothing better, keep to mind this is apparently not connected to Richard Gere's girlfriend, Alejandra Silva. The links tossed about here also offer no solid signs of the needed notability too. SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no indication of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep She has been in Spanish news steadily for the past 2 years. She is on the June cover of Hola! She is in Vanity Fair, too. However, much coverage is related to Richard Gere, her boyfriend, but not all of it is. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
-The result was '''no consensus'''. The discussion is leaning toward deletion, but the "no indication of notability" delete !vote is ambiguous in terms of whether or not source searches were performed, or if it is based only upon [[WP:NEXIST|the state of sourcing in the article]], which is not an indicator of whether or not a subject is notable. The weak keep !vote provides some evidence to substantiate the rationale. Ultimately, no consens for a particular action exists relative to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and the strengths of the overall arguments herein. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 02:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
+The result was '''no consensus'''. The discussion is leaning toward deletion, but the "no indication of notability" delete !vote is ambiguous in terms of whether or not it is based only upon [[WP:NEXIST|the state of sourcing in the article]], which is not an indicator of whether or not a subject is notable, or if additional source searches were performed to qualify the stance. The weak keep !vote provides some evidence to substantiate the rationale. Ultimately, no consensus for a particular action exists relative to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and the strengths of the overall arguments herein. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 02:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 ===[[Alejandra Silva]]===
 :{{la|Alejandra Silva}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandra Silva|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 30#{{anchorencode:Alejandra Silva}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alejandra_Silva Stats]</span>)