Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaclyn Glenn: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Makk3232 (talk | contribs)
Fixed based on articles page
Makk3232 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources AFD|Jaclyn Glenn}})
:({{Find sources AFD|Jaclyn Glenn}})


*'''Delete''' Lack of sources {{Prod blp/dated|concern=|month=June|day=16|year=2016|time=05:16|timestamp=20160616051654|user=}} <!-- Do not use the "prod blp/dated" template directly; the above line is generated by "subst:prod blp|reason" -->, notability by {{notability}} guidelines. As it stands does not meet Wikipedia criteria. Many sources are not Primary, they are secondary or blog sources. There are many YouTube personalities with large followings that do not meet Wikipedia's standards for a stand alone page. I do not feel based on the current setup of this page that this individual ranks in that category either.[[User:Makk3232|Makk3232]] ([[User talk:Makk3232|talk]]) 04:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Lack of sources "subst:prod blp|reason", notability by {{notability}} guidelines. As it stands does not meet Wikipedia criteria. Many sources are not Primary, they are secondary or blog sources. There are many YouTube personalities with large followings that do not meet Wikipedia's standards for a stand alone page. I do not feel based on the current setup of this page that this individual ranks in that category either.[[User:Makk3232|Makk3232]] ([[User talk:Makk3232|talk]]) 04:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:18, 16 June 2016

Jaclyn Glenn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Delete Lack of sources "subst:prod blp|reason", notability by guidelines. As it stands does not meet Wikipedia criteria. Many sources are not Primary, they are secondary or blog sources. There are many YouTube personalities with large followings that do not meet Wikipedia's standards for a stand alone page. I do not feel based on the current setup of this page that this individual ranks in that category either.Makk3232 (talk) 04:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]