Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaclyn Glenn: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:51, 16 June 2016

Jaclyn Glenn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Lack of sources, and the article lacks notability by notability guidelines. As it stands does not meet Wikipedia criteria. Many sources are not Primary, they are secondary or blog sources. There are many YouTube personalities with large followings that do not meet Wikipedia's standards for a stand alone page. I do not feel based on the current setup of this page that this individual ranks in that category either. In short fails Fails WP:GNG, and fails WP:BASIC, as most information available via Google is Blog based, or interview sources, nothing Primary. Makk3232 (talk) 04:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 08:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 :({{Find sources AFD|Jaclyn Glenn}})
-*'''Delete''' Lack of sources, and the article lacks notability by notability guidelines. As it stands does not meet Wikipedia criteria. Many sources are not Primary, they are secondary or blog sources. There are many YouTube personalities with large followings that do not meet Wikipedia's standards for a stand alone page. I do not feel based on the current setup of this page that this individual ranks in that category either.[[User:Makk3232|Makk3232]] ([[User talk:Makk3232|talk]]) 04:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Lack of sources, and the article lacks notability by notability guidelines. As it stands does not meet Wikipedia criteria. Many sources are not Primary, they are secondary or blog sources. There are many YouTube personalities with large followings that do not meet Wikipedia's standards for a stand alone page. I do not feel based on the current setup of this page that this individual ranks in that category either. In short fails Fails [[WP:GNG]], and fails [[WP:BASIC]], as most information available via Google is Blog based, or interview sources, nothing Primary. [[User:Makk3232|Makk3232]] ([[User talk:Makk3232|talk]]) 04:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 *<small>'''Automated comment:''' This AfD was not correctly [[WP:TRANSCLUDE|transcluded]] to the log ([[WP:AFDHOWTO|step 3]]).  I have transcluded it to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 16]].  —[[User:Cyberbot I|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot I</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot I|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 05:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!--Cyberbot I relist-->
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:GSS-1987|<span style="font-family: monospace;font-weight: bold;font-size: 16px;color: hsl(205, 98%, 55%); ">GSS</span>]] ([[User talk:GSS-1987|talk]]) 08:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)</small>