Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abctales (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Starting |
Updating nomination page with notices (delsort.js) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|Abctales}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Abctales}}) |
||
This has actually (1) not substantially improved since starting in August 2008 but (2) also has not actually substantially improve since the 1st AfD by {{U|DGG}} in January 2013, that AfD itself was kept because of a few links listed but that's all they were, a few links and quote "paragraphs", nothing substantial and my own searches have found this also. This has also not improved since {{U|Drmies}} tagged and protected three years ago (note he deleted his own 2nd AfD). The first two sources, The Argus and Spiegel.de mention them a few times but it's still questionably borderline at best. I should note I still confirm my original PROD: "Listed sources are not actual substantial coverage sources and their own links are also noticeably listed, my searches also found nothing convincingly better to suggest this can be improved. The best source listed, The Telegraph, is only a mere paragraph about the website listed along with several other websites". [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 21:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC) |
This has actually (1) not substantially improved since starting in August 2008 but (2) also has not actually substantially improve since the 1st AfD by {{U|DGG}} in January 2013, that AfD itself was kept because of a few links listed but that's all they were, a few links and quote "paragraphs", nothing substantial and my own searches have found this also. This has also not improved since {{U|Drmies}} tagged and protected three years ago (note he deleted his own 2nd AfD). The first two sources, The Argus and Spiegel.de mention them a few times but it's still questionably borderline at best. I should note I still confirm my original PROD: "Listed sources are not actual substantial coverage sources and their own links are also noticeably listed, my searches also found nothing convincingly better to suggest this can be improved. The best source listed, The Telegraph, is only a mere paragraph about the website listed along with several other websites". [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 21:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature|list of Literature-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 21:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Revision as of 21:36, 24 June 2016
- Abctales (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has actually (1) not substantially improved since starting in August 2008 but (2) also has not actually substantially improve since the 1st AfD by DGG in January 2013, that AfD itself was kept because of a few links listed but that's all they were, a few links and quote "paragraphs", nothing substantial and my own searches have found this also. This has also not improved since Drmies tagged and protected three years ago (note he deleted his own 2nd AfD). The first two sources, The Argus and Spiegel.de mention them a few times but it's still questionably borderline at best. I should note I still confirm my original PROD: "Listed sources are not actual substantial coverage sources and their own links are also noticeably listed, my searches also found nothing convincingly better to suggest this can be improved. The best source listed, The Telegraph, is only a mere paragraph about the website listed along with several other websites". SwisterTwister talk 21:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)