Talk:Killing of Freddie Gray: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Death of Freddie Gray/Archive 2) (bot |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
{{Press|url=https://aaa.uoregon.edu/news/artists-join-volunteers-change-how-women-represented-wikipedia|title=Artists join volunteers at 'edit-a-thon' to change how women are represented in Wikipedia|author=Malone, Emerson|org=School of Architecture and Allied Arts, University of Oregon|accessdate=March 13, 2016|date=March 10, 2016}} |
{{Press|url=https://aaa.uoregon.edu/news/artists-join-volunteers-change-how-women-represented-wikipedia|title=Artists join volunteers at 'edit-a-thon' to change how women are represented in Wikipedia|author=Malone, Emerson|org=School of Architecture and Allied Arts, University of Oregon|accessdate=March 13, 2016|date=March 10, 2016}} |
||
{{Archives}} |
{{Archives}} |
||
== has this article just been abandoned?== |
|||
it started of heavilly biased with the writing largely favor an exaggerated who-dun-it style making stuff up or drawing inferences with no reason to. Now much of this stuff has ben completely disproven in court, such as the completely bogus" rough rid" theory, as they had video recording of the van he was in and it appaeared to be driving normally at all times, on top of another passnger in the fan testifying that the fan ride was completely smooth. Instead this fairy tale rough riden nonsense is not only in the article but a large portion of the lede. The judge just completely eviscerated mosby's entire prosuction of the case saying she had no a single shred of evidence and didn't even draw reasonable inferences. This should be a nifonglike controvrsy at this point regarding a political witch hunt, not a made up fairy tale of no existent police brutality that there is not oen shred of evidence or reasonable inferences supporting [[Special:Contributions/68.117.95.24|68.117.95.24]] ([[User talk:68.117.95.24|talk]]) 16:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:51, 26 June 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Killing of Freddie Gray article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Killing of Freddie Gray article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
A news item involving Killing of Freddie Gray was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 1 May 2015. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
has this article just been abandoned?
it started of heavilly biased with the writing largely favor an exaggerated who-dun-it style making stuff up or drawing inferences with no reason to. Now much of this stuff has ben completely disproven in court, such as the completely bogus" rough rid" theory, as they had video recording of the van he was in and it appaeared to be driving normally at all times, on top of another passnger in the fan testifying that the fan ride was completely smooth. Instead this fairy tale rough riden nonsense is not only in the article but a large portion of the lede. The judge just completely eviscerated mosby's entire prosuction of the case saying she had no a single shred of evidence and didn't even draw reasonable inferences. This should be a nifonglike controvrsy at this point regarding a political witch hunt, not a made up fairy tale of no existent police brutality that there is not oen shred of evidence or reasonable inferences supporting 68.117.95.24 (talk) 16:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Maryland articles
- Mid-importance Maryland articles
- WikiProject Maryland articles
- B-Class Law enforcement articles
- Unknown-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- B-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press