Jump to content

Talk:Killing of Freddie Gray: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Death of Freddie Gray/Archive 2) (bot
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
{{Press|url=https://aaa.uoregon.edu/news/artists-join-volunteers-change-how-women-represented-wikipedia|title=Artists join volunteers at 'edit-a-thon' to change how women are represented in Wikipedia|author=Malone, Emerson|org=School of Architecture and Allied Arts, University of Oregon|accessdate=March 13, 2016|date=March 10, 2016}}
{{Press|url=https://aaa.uoregon.edu/news/artists-join-volunteers-change-how-women-represented-wikipedia|title=Artists join volunteers at 'edit-a-thon' to change how women are represented in Wikipedia|author=Malone, Emerson|org=School of Architecture and Allied Arts, University of Oregon|accessdate=March 13, 2016|date=March 10, 2016}}
{{Archives}}
{{Archives}}

== has this article just been abandoned?==
it started of heavilly biased with the writing largely favor an exaggerated who-dun-it style making stuff up or drawing inferences with no reason to. Now much of this stuff has ben completely disproven in court, such as the completely bogus" rough rid" theory, as they had video recording of the van he was in and it appaeared to be driving normally at all times, on top of another passnger in the fan testifying that the fan ride was completely smooth. Instead this fairy tale rough riden nonsense is not only in the article but a large portion of the lede. The judge just completely eviscerated mosby's entire prosuction of the case saying she had no a single shred of evidence and didn't even draw reasonable inferences. This should be a nifonglike controvrsy at this point regarding a political witch hunt, not a made up fairy tale of no existent police brutality that there is not oen shred of evidence or reasonable inferences supporting [[Special:Contributions/68.117.95.24|68.117.95.24]] ([[User talk:68.117.95.24|talk]]) 16:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:51, 26 June 2016

has this article just been abandoned?

it started of heavilly biased with the writing largely favor an exaggerated who-dun-it style making stuff up or drawing inferences with no reason to. Now much of this stuff has ben completely disproven in court, such as the completely bogus" rough rid" theory, as they had video recording of the van he was in and it appaeared to be driving normally at all times, on top of another passnger in the fan testifying that the fan ride was completely smooth. Instead this fairy tale rough riden nonsense is not only in the article but a large portion of the lede. The judge just completely eviscerated mosby's entire prosuction of the case saying she had no a single shred of evidence and didn't even draw reasonable inferences. This should be a nifonglike controvrsy at this point regarding a political witch hunt, not a made up fairy tale of no existent police brutality that there is not oen shred of evidence or reasonable inferences supporting 68.117.95.24 (talk) 16:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]