Talk:Sugar dating: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:45, 28 June 2016

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Friendly search suggestions

Page move

A better name? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

Hi The Drover's Wife. Content was removed in these edits. There are sourcs for all of that. Plus, the prostitution part does make sense. Please, let's restore it with sources, okay? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:53, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was removed because it was wrong: just because an article focused on sugaring in a college context does not mean that sugaring as a concept is. The "average" is from one article, not cited to who made that claim, and pretty hilariously misinformed. Both parties consent to the arrangement in prostitution as well, which is why I removed it: it makes absolutely no sense; not to mention that (as many sources discuss) the lines between sugaring and prostitution are relatively blurred, and people may well be both. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmmmmmm...........good points! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan

It's a bit of an orphan. Could you suggest some places it could go? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SeekingArrangement has its own article, a summary style breakout of Mistress, the template that is already on the article, and there are probably a few sex work templates/articles it belongs in too. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for that. I'll see what I can do. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Student

This is just not true. 44% does not equal "absolutely all" just because you found a few HuffPo trend pieces focused on the student angle. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. You'll have to forgive my poor article construction. I'm terribly distracted off-wiki. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can a comparison or a link be made between sugar baby and compensated dating(enjo kosai)

These articles can be in fact merged into one. The compensated dating page focuses more on its implications on the Japanese society. --Appleuseryu (talk) 16:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 This is just not true. [http://www.cosmopolitan.com.au/health-lifestyle/lifestyle/2014/2/the-secret-world-of-sugar-babies/ 44%] does not equal "absolutely all" just because you found a few HuffPo trend pieces focused on the student angle. [[User:The Drover&#39;s Wife|The Drover&#39;s Wife]] ([[User talk:The Drover&#39;s Wife|talk]]) 02:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 :Fair enough. You'll have to forgive my poor article construction. I'm terribly distracted off-wiki. Cheers. [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 02:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
+== Can a comparison or a link be made between sugar baby and compensated dating(enjo kosai) ==
+These articles can be in fact merged into one. The compensated dating page focuses more on its implications on the Japanese society.
+--[[User:Appleuseryu|Appleuseryu]] ([[User talk:Appleuseryu|talk]]) 16:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)