Talk:Sugar dating: Difference between revisions
Appleuseryu (talk | contribs) |
Appleuseryu (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:Fair enough. You'll have to forgive my poor article construction. I'm terribly distracted off-wiki. Cheers. [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 02:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC) |
:Fair enough. You'll have to forgive my poor article construction. I'm terribly distracted off-wiki. Cheers. [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 02:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
== |
== Comparison or a link be made between sugar baby and compensated dating(enjo kosai) == |
||
These articles can be in fact merged into one. The compensated dating page focuses more on its implications on the Japanese society. |
These articles can be in fact merged into one. The compensated dating page focuses more on its implications on the Japanese society. |
Revision as of 16:45, 28 June 2016
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Template:Friendly search suggestions
Page move
A better name? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Reverts
Hi The Drover's Wife. Content was removed in these edits. There are sourcs for all of that. Plus, the prostitution part does make sense. Please, let's restore it with sources, okay? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:53, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- It was removed because it was wrong: just because an article focused on sugaring in a college context does not mean that sugaring as a concept is. The "average" is from one article, not cited to who made that claim, and pretty hilariously misinformed. Both parties consent to the arrangement in prostitution as well, which is why I removed it: it makes absolutely no sense; not to mention that (as many sources discuss) the lines between sugaring and prostitution are relatively blurred, and people may well be both. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hmmmmmmmm...........good points! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Orphan
It's a bit of an orphan. Could you suggest some places it could go? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- SeekingArrangement has its own article, a summary style breakout of Mistress, the template that is already on the article, and there are probably a few sex work templates/articles it belongs in too. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks for that. I'll see what I can do. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Student
This is just not true. 44% does not equal "absolutely all" just because you found a few HuffPo trend pieces focused on the student angle. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough. You'll have to forgive my poor article construction. I'm terribly distracted off-wiki. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Comparison or a link be made between sugar baby and compensated dating(enjo kosai)
These articles can be in fact merged into one. The compensated dating page focuses more on its implications on the Japanese society. --Appleuseryu (talk) 16:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Start-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- Start-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles