Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gstigler: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Benvenut7 - ""
Benvenut7 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>


At the top of this page says: Do not make accusations without providing evidence. Doing so is a personal attack and will likely be summarily removed.
And this is exactly what this person is doing !
I am not affiliated to the reported account (Gstigler) I dont know what are the fundaments of the [[User:Sro23]] to involved me in this dispute. Plase remove me of this, I didnt do anything againts the community, just contribs with good faith. He is the one who spam my contributions without any good reason.


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 06:59, 29 June 2016

I am not affiliated to the reported account (Gstigler) I dont know what are the fundaments of the user: Sro23 to involved me in this dispute. Plase remove me of this, and unblock my user because I didnt do anything againts the community, just contribs with good faith. This is total unfair, that Sro23 is spamming me with lies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benvenut7 (talkcontribs) 06:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply] 


Gstigler

Gstigler (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gstigler/Archive.



29 June 2016

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

User:Yamaguchi先生 recently removed a whole bunch of unsourced claims on Rodrigo Semprun. Soon later, User:VrK11 edits the redirect to Rodrigo Semprun, Rodrigo Semprún (note the accent), to Gstigler's preferred version of the article. Sro23 (talk) 03:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added new account User:Benvenut7, who also edited the same article. Sro23 (talk) 03:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

At the top of this page says: Do not make accusations without providing evidence. Doing so is a personal attack and will likely be summarily removed. And this is exactly what this person is doing ! I am not affiliated to the reported account (Gstigler) I dont know what are the fundaments of the User:Sro23 to involved me in this dispute. Plase remove me of this, I didnt do anything againts the community, just contribs with good faith. He is the one who spam my contributions without any good reason.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments