User talk:173.52.99.208

Strange

I find it strange an IP user such as yourself first appears to defend articles by a certain user. Care to explain?ALongStay (talk) 16:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Who are you? I won't even bother. Engaging you might cause further issues as per [1]. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 18:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

No need, your lack of response is all I need. You can go back to your user account next time to vote at Afds, you aren't fooling me, I know exactly who you are. Ta-tah.ALongStay (talk) 18:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your recent tagging of articles for AFD

If you believe that these articles should be nominated for AFD, you should follow the directions and familiarize yourself with how to properly nominate an article first before tagging them yourself, as you did not nominate these articles properly. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:00, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

I got your message. Hold on; you might be right... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

I responded to your message on my talk page. In short, you are correct! I restored your AFD tags, and I manually fixed the Baby Grandmothers article (you didn't add a speedy deletion tag, you added the notification that goes on the creator's user talk page) :-). Thanks for leaving me a message and for the heads up :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:15, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Editing logged out to evade scrutiny is not allowed

I believe I know who you are too, like the user above. Note that editing logged out to evade scrutiny is not allowed. Please use your account to nominate articles for deletion and all other purposes. Bishonen | talk 15:40, 6 July 2016 (UTC).

I looked at WP:EVADE. Am I blocked anywhere else? I also looked at WP:SCRUTINY. What have I violated? "Editing under multiple IP addresses may be treated the same as editing under multiple accounts where it is done deceptively or otherwise violates the principles of this policy. Where editors log out by mistake, they may wish to contact an editor with oversight access to ensure there is no misunderstanding." What is my IP address linked to? 173.52.99.208 (talk) 18:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Note, IP, that trying to encourage another editor to breach WP:OUTING is as bad as actually doing it oneself. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

• Shrug. I'm depressed to see such a dishonest and evasive reply from you, IP. Bishonen | talk 18:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC).

Nomination of Afd

Since you are presumably CrazyAces489, I am telling you Hank Kraft has been nominated for deletion.ALongStay (talk) 04:47, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification

You are being discussed at AN/I. I know you know this but I was requested to message you.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 06:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 06:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for evading a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 07:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

173.52.99.208 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Since when was I blocked? I am responding on AN/I. Am I being disruptive? 173.52.99.208 (talk) 07:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Since when was I blocked? I am responding on AN/I. Am I being disruptive? [[Special:Contributions/173.52.99.208|173.52.99.208]] ([[User talk:173.52.99.208#top|talk]]) 07:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Since when was I blocked? I am responding on AN/I. Am I being disruptive? [[Special:Contributions/173.52.99.208|173.52.99.208]] ([[User talk:173.52.99.208#top|talk]]) 07:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Since when was I blocked? I am responding on AN/I. Am I being disruptive? [[Special:Contributions/173.52.99.208|173.52.99.208]] ([[User talk:173.52.99.208#top|talk]]) 07:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

.