Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Sartorius: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Jacob Sartorius: Snow keep
Line 19: Line 19:
* '''Keep''' Poor article? Yes. Non-notable? No. He easily passes [[WP:MUSIC]] point 2 as one of his songs has appeared in the top 100. '''[[User:Omni Flames|<span style="color:#68829E; font-family:Segoe UI; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #C4DFE6">Omni Flames</span>]] ([[User_talk:Omni Flames|<span style="color:#A2C523;">talk</span>]])''' 04:52, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' Poor article? Yes. Non-notable? No. He easily passes [[WP:MUSIC]] point 2 as one of his songs has appeared in the top 100. '''[[User:Omni Flames|<span style="color:#68829E; font-family:Segoe UI; text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #C4DFE6">Omni Flames</span>]] ([[User_talk:Omni Flames|<span style="color:#A2C523;">talk</span>]])''' 04:52, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', for better or worse, sufficient coverage exists of him to meet GNG. Article has/had some COI and promo issues, and it should be kept watched, but it does meet gng itco. [[User:Crow|<font color="black">'''Crow'''</font>]][[User talk:Crow|<font color="black"><sup><small>''Caw''</small></sup></font>]] 18:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', for better or worse, sufficient coverage exists of him to meet GNG. Article has/had some COI and promo issues, and it should be kept watched, but it does meet gng itco. [[User:Crow|<font color="black">'''Crow'''</font>]][[User talk:Crow|<font color="black"><sup><small>''Caw''</small></sup></font>]] 18:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''SNOW Keep''' – Passes WP:GNG, especially for being on the Billboard Hot 100 as a passing criteria for WP:MUSICBIO. [[User:Adog104|'''<span style="color:#8FBCE6">A</span><span style="color:#092C5C">dog</span><span style="color:#F5D130">104</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Adog104|<span style="color:#2EB347">'''''Talk to me'''''</span>]]</sup> 22:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:24, 13 July 2016

Jacob Sartorius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nonnotable singer. Only promotional babble in references. - üser:Altenmann >t 04:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Sartorius stop claiming false WP:OWNERSHIP of Jacob Sartorius. I added a majority of the (sourced) information and citations [1] [2] and submitted the article for review [3]. Here are some of your edits, not a single citation used. [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] And the first edit was actually by "Ivyarrow"[13], so neither of us actually "created" or started the page, but one did make much more significant contributions. I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO (talk) 04:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This person is sufficiently notable. --Dcirovic (talk) 06:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello, significant contributor here. I added a majority of the information and references to the article and submitted it at Articles for creation. SwisterTwister declined it and I agree with his decision. Someone better not claim I'm breaking one or more of your precious policies by exercising my right to ¡vote!
  • Keep as this individual is notable - in fact, his single recently entered the Billboard Hot 100. --Zerotalk 14:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 23:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]