Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OWMC: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
«new: +(46 words)» starting afd |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[OWMC]]=== |
===[[OWMC]]=== |
||
A disputed PROD. Article has no sources, no editors seem capable of providing them (Google turns up little to nothing, for example), and even were it verifiable and sourced and not a hoax or something, I'm not sure it would be notable. --[[User:Marudubshinki |maru]] [[User talk:Marudubshinki| (talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Marudubshinki | contribs]] 04:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC) |
A disputed PROD. Article has no sources, no editors seem capable of providing them (Google turns up little to nothing, for example), and even were it verifiable and sourced and not a hoax or something, I'm not sure it would be notable. --[[User:Marudubshinki |maru]] [[User talk:Marudubshinki| (talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Marudubshinki | contribs]] 04:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete and Resubmit With More Detail''' This article does not have enough contextual detail to even really qualify as a stub. I recommend deletion, and leave a note on the author's talk page encouraging them to flesh the page out with more details and resubmit it. --[[User:Dtony102|dtony]] 05:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:34, 31 August 2006
A disputed PROD. Article has no sources, no editors seem capable of providing them (Google turns up little to nothing, for example), and even were it verifiable and sourced and not a hoax or something, I'm not sure it would be notable. --maru (talk) contribs 04:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and Resubmit With More Detail This article does not have enough contextual detail to even really qualify as a stub. I recommend deletion, and leave a note on the author's talk page encouraging them to flesh the page out with more details and resubmit it. --dtony 05:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)