User talk:75.175.65.141: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::NeilN, you sound confused. Are you using boilerplate comments, that don't actually apply to the situation at hand? [[Special:Contributions/75.175.65.141|75.175.65.141]] ([[User talk:75.175.65.141#top|talk]]) 20:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC) |
::NeilN, you sound confused. Are you using boilerplate comments, that don't actually apply to the situation at hand? [[Special:Contributions/75.175.65.141|75.175.65.141]] ([[User talk:75.175.65.141#top|talk]]) 20:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
:::I am not confused. Just so '''you're''' clear: Do not add back your allegation without providing rock solid mainstream sources. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 20:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC) |
:::I am not confused. Just so '''you're''' clear: Do not add back your allegation without providing rock solid mainstream sources. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 20:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
::::Is "New Yorker" magazine a "rock solid mainsteam source"? Or is what you want a "rock solid mainstream source that doesn't show that Obama used an American terrorist as a ghost-writer and has been lying about it for years" [[Special:Contributions/75.175.65.141|75.175.65.141]] ([[User talk:75.175.65.141#top|talk]]) 20:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:31, 26 July 2016
July 2016
Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Sro23, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. NeilN talk to me 20:20, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- NeilN, you sound confused. Are you using boilerplate comments, that don't actually apply to the situation at hand? 75.175.65.141 (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- I am not confused. Just so you're clear: Do not add back your allegation without providing rock solid mainstream sources. --NeilN talk to me 20:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Is "New Yorker" magazine a "rock solid mainsteam source"? Or is what you want a "rock solid mainstream source that doesn't show that Obama used an American terrorist as a ghost-writer and has been lying about it for years" 75.175.65.141 (talk) 20:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- I am not confused. Just so you're clear: Do not add back your allegation without providing rock solid mainstream sources. --NeilN talk to me 20:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- NeilN, you sound confused. Are you using boilerplate comments, that don't actually apply to the situation at hand? 75.175.65.141 (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)