Talk:Hankel matrix: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Reference to R. B. Pachori: new section |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Please improve the section on system identification... it currently doesn't begin to suggest how one might actually do this.--[[User:Witbrock|Witbrock]] ([[User talk:Witbrock|talk]]) 18:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC) |
Please improve the section on system identification... it currently doesn't begin to suggest how one might actually do this.--[[User:Witbrock|Witbrock]] ([[User talk:Witbrock|talk]]) 18:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Reference to R. B. Pachori == |
|||
Bhajan123 has been including references to R. B. Pachori in several articles. Bhajan123 may simply be promoting his or her own work. I recommend removing such references. — [[User:Anita5192|Anita5192]] ([[User talk:Anita5192|talk]]) 19:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:41, 31 July 2016
Mathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority | ||||||||||
|
Hankel transform as presented in the text correct?
does the material presented in the section Hankel transform correct? I can make a simple example to violate it! For example, take b1=1, b2=1, b3=2 and you will have detB=1 but detC=-1! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.18.170.199 (talk) 09:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
formula is now correctBPets (talk) 04:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Please improve the section on system identification... it currently doesn't begin to suggest how one might actually do this.--Witbrock (talk) 18:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Reference to R. B. Pachori
Bhajan123 has been including references to R. B. Pachori in several articles. Bhajan123 may simply be promoting his or her own work. I recommend removing such references. — Anita5192 (talk) 19:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC)