Talk:Hankel matrix: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Reference to R. B. Pachori: new section |
m →Reference to R. B. Pachori: Specified user links |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Reference to R. B. Pachori == |
== Reference to R. B. Pachori == |
||
Bhajan123 has been including references to R. B. Pachori in several articles. Bhajan123 may simply be promoting his or her own work. I recommend removing such references. — [[User:Anita5192|Anita5192]] ([[User talk:Anita5192|talk]]) 19:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC) |
[[User:Bhajan123|Bhajan123]] ([[Special:Contributions/Bhajan123|contributions]]) ([[User talk:Bhajan123|talk]]) has been including references to R. B. Pachori in several articles. Bhajan123 may simply be promoting his or her own work. I recommend removing such references. — [[User:Anita5192|Anita5192]] ([[User talk:Anita5192|talk]]) 19:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:10, 1 August 2016
Mathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority | ||||||||||
|
Hankel transform as presented in the text correct?
does the material presented in the section Hankel transform correct? I can make a simple example to violate it! For example, take b1=1, b2=1, b3=2 and you will have detB=1 but detC=-1! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.18.170.199 (talk) 09:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
formula is now correctBPets (talk) 04:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Please improve the section on system identification... it currently doesn't begin to suggest how one might actually do this.--Witbrock (talk) 18:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Reference to R. B. Pachori
Bhajan123 (contributions) (talk) has been including references to R. B. Pachori in several articles. Bhajan123 may simply be promoting his or her own work. I recommend removing such references. — Anita5192 (talk) 19:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC)