Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SapphireOne: Difference between revisions
m Bbb23 moved page Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JohnAdamsSapphireOne to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SapphireOne: oldest account |
|
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 14:38, 3 August 2016
JohnAdamsSapphireOne
JohnAdamsSapphireOne (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Please note that a case was originally opened under SapphireOne (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JohnAdamsSapphireOne. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JohnAdamsSapphireOne.
28 July 2016
Suspected sockpuppets
- RbABC (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- SapphireOne (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
New user has re-created an article (SapphireOne) that has been repeatedly deleted under WP:A7 and WP:A11 - the original author has been indefinitely blocked and this author has posted the article in an identical format. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:56, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- This is actually the second account to emerge, the first was SaphireOne which was pounced on and quickly blocked by Faithlessthewonderboy (talk · contribs). Additionally, the accounts made a preliminary attempt at creating their article at Sapphireone. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Additionally, our editor doesn't seem to grasp the concept of copyright either - on both occasions I've deleted the article its been created by copying and pasting information verbatim from copyrighted sources. At the rate they are going these accounts are going to end up indef-blocked on WP:COPYVIO. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- I flagged the article for CSD yesterday because I was suspicious about its significance. I later removed the tag because I thought I had mistakenly applied it; the editor arrogantly challenged my CSD request asking to "enlighten [them]" as to why it should be removed. I now see that this article has been repeatedly created and support a block, as "repeated uploading of copyrighted material" is listed on WP:VANDAL. Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 05:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- OTRS agent (verify): See Ticket#2016072910003892. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- See note in ticket. ~ Rob13Talk 06:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Quick update – as of July 31st, User:RbABC is working on the same "SapphireOne" article in the sandbox and as a userspace draft (they have requested feedback from another editor), and has also posted that blue highlighted message across their userpages. Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 05:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)