Jump to content

Talk:Güiro: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 184.166.20.139 - "Untitled: "
Line 54: Line 54:
''This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 03:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
''This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 03:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
|}
|}

== Diaeresis in wrong place ==

This applies both to the article on the Güiro and the Güira - I note that the diaeresis is consistently shown over the 'u', not the 'i'. Two dots over the 'u' would produce the German 'ü' ({{IPA link|ʏ}} sometimes written 'ue'). A diaeresis splits two vowels, which would normally be sounded as a diphthong, or in this case, shows that the 'u' is to be sounded separately, as in Spanish 'gu' before an 'i' or 'e' normally just sounds like a hard 'g'. At some point IMO someone should go through these two articles converting 'üi' to 'uï', and replacing the older articles with Redirects. Comments? [[User:Jpaulm|Jpaulm]] ([[User talk:Jpaulm|talk]]) 15:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:04, 6 August 2016

Untitled

can any one name songs with a guiro playing?

A composition rather than a song, but The Rite of Spring by Igor Stravinsky employs one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Livedevilslivedevil (talkcontribs) 10:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

You will hear good guiro playing in almost any song by Los Van Van or NG La Banda. They have a full-time guirero for those bands. It is a very important part for those Cuban bands.

Probably the "definitive" guiro song is Oye Como Va but I would suggest a Tito Puente original version rather than Santana. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.81.166.225 (talk) 16:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

Frog vs. Toad - just a note, the Guiro in the picture is actually a toad. Toads have parotid glands (the bumps visible behind the eyes), frogs do not.

All I Wanna Do/Sheryl Crow


David Bowie, "The Man Who Sold the World" has it playing throughout. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.166.20.139 (talk) 03:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge rationale

The güiro and güira are very similar instruments, derived from the same base, therefore it does not make sense to have two separate articles. Kakofonous (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I must respectfully disagree. Yes, they are both Latin-American percussion instruments, played in a similar manner, but they are constructed quite differently, have distinctive sounds, and tend to be used with differing musical traditions. Can most people tell a viola from a violin? They are, in my opinion, considerably more similar than are the güira and güiro, but have individual articles. The same can be said for many other groups of similar musical instruments. Wikipedia has over 30 articles on individual types of drums, many of which differ less than do the güira and güiro. Tim Ross·talk 11:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Tim insofar as they are different instruments, so different pages.69.17.15.223 (talk) 05:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree, the articles in my opinion ought to remain separate. Philip.t.day (talk) 16:16, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Being a guirero (I play both kinds), I also have to agree. You'd never see the guira in Cuban son music, and you'd never see a guiro in a Dominican bachata ensemble. If I can, I'd like to remove the tag. DubCrazy (talk) 03:48, 19 August 2008 (UTC)DubCrazy[reply]

There seems to be a reasonable consensus to keep the two articles separate. I will delete the tags. Tim Ross (talk) 11:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "Works that use the instrument"

I am removing the lengthy list of songs which utilise the Guiro. I understand that the instrument is somewhat uncommon in western music; however, no other instrument pages (that I have seen) includes such a list. Some of the entries, if they can be sourced, may be interesting if incorporated into the body of the articles (such as the classical compositions). However, in its current form, the list is inconsistent with wikipedia's formatting and entirely unsourced. Jellocube27 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

File:Mex guiro.gif Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Mex guiro.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mex guiro.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Diaeresis in wrong place

This applies both to the article on the Güiro and the Güira - I note that the diaeresis is consistently shown over the 'u', not the 'i'. Two dots over the 'u' would produce the German 'ü' (ʏ sometimes written 'ue'). A diaeresis splits two vowels, which would normally be sounded as a diphthong, or in this case, shows that the 'u' is to be sounded separately, as in Spanish 'gu' before an 'i' or 'e' normally just sounds like a hard 'g'. At some point IMO someone should go through these two articles converting 'üi' to 'uï', and replacing the older articles with Redirects. Comments? Jpaulm (talk) 15:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]