User talk:Sro23

Talk Page Edit Removal

This was done because the user has been trolling on my page. Hasn't gotten the answer he/she has demanded, refuses to follow the rules, and is now forum shopping. So, I'm applying WP:DENY to the whole thing. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 08:43 on June 27, 2016 (UTC)

I don't know what to say other than the comment didn't seem that bad to me, but I am not involved. Sro23 (talk) 19:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

I was just giving you an explanation. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:38 on June 28, 2016 (UTC)

Your fan...

...has gotten a 1 week rangeblock. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Camisole

FYI: wp:RFPP here Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Impersonations

FYI: I haven't created any doppelgänger accounts. If you see a user with a name similar to mine, report it immediately. Sro23 (talk) 03:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your request

1 month /29 rangeblock. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:22, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, but this person is back. The IP's are from all around the world, so they might be editing via open proxies. Sro23 (talk) 04:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Materialscientist can you help out? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't watch this page and don't receive pings. Yes, they are kind of "proxies" (upon a brief look), i.e. rangeblocks won't work, and semiprotection would be a more efficient route. Materialscientist (talk) 08:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

The problem is it's not the articles they're attacking, it's Sro23. Whatever article Sro23 touched as part of their patrolling would turn into a revertfest. Do you still advocate semi-protection in this case? I will certainly heed your advice. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

This is a standard situation where semiprotection is the best remedy. It can be brief if the disruption is caused only by the maniac, or can be longer if there is a history of vandalism/spam/etc. Materialscientist (talk) 22:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Unreliable source?

You said that famousbirthdays.com was an unreliable source on 'Maty Noyes' page, I do not understand what was unreliable about this source. Please could you tell me your reasoning for this. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipediaeditperson (talk • contribs) 19:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

I direct you to WP:IRS. The tell-tale signs of unreliable online sources are often a lack of author, lack of credibility for publisher, and sometimes but not always .com, .info, .net open domains. If you read the website's about page, you'll see that under the "CONTRIBUTING TO FAMOUS BIRTHDAYS" section it implies anyone can submit to the site (just like wikipedia) therefore it is not trustworthy. Sro23 (talk) 19:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

I understand that it is able to be contributed by anyone, but as you say Wikipedia is the same - it is a bit contradictory to say that a website is not reliable, because that would make Wikipedia unreliable. Also, you cannot just update the website famousbirthdays.com - you can suggest an update, but this has to be reviewed prior to being put on the website, so I feel that this makes it a suitable and reliable source. Would you agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipediaeditperson (talk • contribs) 20:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

But that's the thing, Wikipedia isn't reliable (even if it may contain links to reliable sources). I still don't trust the website because so little is known about who exactly runs it. Why should we believe them? Sro23 (talk) 20:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok, I dont agree that Wikipedia is unreliable - there are a lot of members and if someone makes a mistake, it is usually picked up by others. Also, as I said, the famousbirthdays website verifies every edit, making it even more reliable than Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipediaeditperson (talk • contribs) 20:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Desalination

Can someone please revert the vandalism on Desalination now. Lol. Sro23 (talk) 08:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Greeku Veerudu

What is the necessity of redirecting it to the director and adding categories?PhysicsScientist (talk) 00:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Do you mean Greeku Veerudu (1998 film)? I assume it's because it doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for films, so redirect to its director. And what's wrong with adding categories to redirects? If you think it's not a helpful redirect, you can list it for discussion but please don't blank pages. Sro23 (talk) 00:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Doing like this increased the films (which were created) by the director by 1. I just do not like it. What will happen if it is deleted?PhysicsScientist (talk) 12:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

About the edit on List of Space Shuttle missions.

How is reinstating an IP warriors edits not vandalism? The IP has been blocked for his malicious edits. If the IP just wanted to comment out the entire page, why would he make any "good" edits? I'm a bit confused. MegaMan1988 (talk) 04:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Just because an editor is blocked, does not mean all of their edits should automatically be reverted. The edit was actually constructive (aside from the unexplained commenting out). Blindly reverting every edit from blocked users is not the best idea, especially if it reinstates BLP and copyright violations, vandalism, typos, factual errors, etc. Sro23 (talk) 04:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Someone really hates me. I log into literally hundreds of my edits being reverted every day. That's crazy, and in the end I'm only creating more work for everyone else.

I decided I'm going to stop or at least slow down editing for a bit until things cool off. Thank you so much everyone who reverts, protects, blocks, reports, etc. I truly appreciate it. Sro23 (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Relax. If he/she/and-or-it isn't reverting your edits, it'll only happen to someone else. There are many eyes watching. Again, relax. It's all good.   Aloha27  talk  15:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thanks for your help with that sockpuppet issue while continuing to work tirelessly to revert other disruptions. United States Man (talk) 22:11, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Point me...

To the relevant banning information? LadyofShalott 04:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own Sro23 (talk) 04:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! LadyofShalott 04:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit warriors

Always worth making sure the problem user has been explicitly warned not to edit war, as they may be blissfully unaware that it's ever a problem - just stick a {{uw-ew}} template on their user page. I'll give Wythy the benefit of the doubt on their latest revert as they might have been writing their "determined to conceal these *facts*" edit summary while I was warning them. --McGeddon (talk) 18:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, I was going to do so. Sro23 (talk) 18:22, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

The "professional"

Our favorite editor has returned to her old ways at Ginnifer Goodwin et al. I've requested the Robby Benson page be semi-protected, and that perhaps the Goodwin page be put under pending changes protection. If you want to warn him, feel free. I don't feel it's necessary to edit-war with it over the changes. An admin will do the protecting and likely block the entity. Maybe even a rangeblock. Anyhoo, cheerio. :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 07:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Editor wondering if you are a robot and some other stuff ;)

Hello Sro23 i am not sure if you are a robot or not but either way would like if you could reply soon. I do not feel in anyway me edit was bias and am the slightest bit shocked that Ukraine even though i am American doesn't have its own segment even though there are picture of Ukrainian vodka being used in the article. I apologise if taken wrongly but am just trying to find a solution to the very obvious mistake which is needed to be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.164.156.203 (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @101.164.156.203: Never mind that- you should play close attention to the messages Sro32 has left you on your Talk Page. You should have been reported for edit-warring, but he is an amazingly forgiving editor. May I suggest though, that you refrain from making another edit to the Vodka article. If you do, it wil likely be interpreted as a continuing of your ethno-centric point-of-view pushing and either he or I will be forced to seek administrative attention. Cheers! -and happy editing. _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Sock

This user (Bysomalilander) is another sock of that recently banned user. I will assist you in the clean up as well in the meantime. AcidSnow (talk) 22:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

My apologize it's not a sock but rather the owner. AcidSnow (talk) 01:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you...so much. omg. According to the SPI the account is unrelated (despite acting the exact same way), so the situation is more complicated than I first thought. Maybe we should ask Wikipedia:WikiProject Somalia for guidance? Sro23 (talk) 01:05, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

AcidSnow ,Sro23 (talk) you two make me sick instead of apologizing to me you both for accusing me you guys apologize to each other. what kind of a movie is this Sooraan and Jawan ?Bysomalilander (talk) 01:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Bysomalilander: They're just only making a big mistake on that part, please don't accuse them as they apologize each other? They're also a people like you, making a mistake sometimes. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

What are your thoughts on this new account that has recently surfaced: Bluebluellllll? I have already gone and reported it as I believe there is enough similarities already present. Also, I am not sure what exactly the project page will do for us in this situation. I usually do my best to act fast when there's a disturbance. AcidSnow (talk)

Louisa Johnson

I took the liberty of leaving a high level BLP warning for a revert you made to this article. We edit conflicted on the revert but you never left a warning on the user's talk page, so eventually I did. Meters (talk) 07:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Ah, i see what probably happened. You reverted the minor 2nd bit of vandalism and never noticed the major BLP edit it was hiding. Meters (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I didn't even bother warning, I just went straight to AIV, since the account is cleary WP:NOTHERE. It's still not blocked yet though...Sro23 (talk) 07:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

I should have checked there I guess. No biggie. I was just touching base since I don't usually leave warnings on someone else's rvt. Meters (talk) 07:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

How to revert move changes?

Hi sorry I'm new to all this and trying to correct an error, someone incorrectly moved the SimBin Studios page to the Sector3 Studios page, they should be 2 separate pages as they are 2 completely separate companies.— Preceding unsigned comment added by USteppin (talk • contribs) 13:16, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. It's okay I understand. What you can do is place the WP:RMCM template on the talk page of Sector3 Studios, requesting it be moved to SimBin, to preserve history. Then a new article can be created for Sector3 Studios. We'll need some reliable sources to verify that the companies have split first however. Once the page moves are sorted out, I can also change the incorrect redirects as well. Sro23 (talk) 14:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

star NGC 67

My Recent purchase of a Name a star pack gave me the ability to rename the star NGC 67, the information about the star that is provided is different to the wiki page so decided to change it based on the sources provided. But my changes were been reverted by you, please give me the ability to edit the page based on MY sources Thanks Jake Rattlesnake7501 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Rattlesnake7501, please read this. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

@Rattlesnake7501: I've got some magic beans here if you want them...? _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

• You know it's not even a single star anyway, it's a galaxy? I hope you didn't pay much! Andy Dingley (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

My edits

Why are you reverting useful edits Kiuy1 (talk) 19:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Because you are an obvious sockpuppet. Save us all the time and give it up. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Of User:Filipz123? Classic! What an imagination he's got _Muffled ^Pocketed 19:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

For your continuing work

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		You deserve this for your efforts in reverting the numerous "pain in the patoot" people who are harassing other editors (and occasionally you) on an almost daily basis. Your vigilance is much appreciated. MarnetteD|Talk 00:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Template:Z147

And occasionally me it turns out :-) Many thanks for the reverts and enjoy your weekend. MarnetteD|Talk 04:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Spam immediate

{{uw-spam4im}} is a good way to give an immediate final warning. I like the blacklist notice in the template. Do be careful as giving a -4im- warning will cause Huggle to want to send a wp:AIV report and an admin may be reluctant to block for a few warnings. Then again, some seem quite willing to do so. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

No worries

No worries; I'm used to socks. Take a gander at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002/Archive. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Just wanted to say

I really wanted to revert this guy and say "no you fuck off" but you did it before me..--Bolter21 (talk to me) 23:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, lol...Sro23 (talk) 23:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	You're catching those socks before I can! RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:40, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

NYC Dcas

you keep changing this wiki page with incorrect information, please look up this job in google and will see that they are not listed as police agency or department. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:7085:AB00:AD8A:5368:2F87:EA3A (talk) 19:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

click on the wiki page hyper link and you will see the job description and employment requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:7085:AB00:AD8A:5368:2F87:EA3A (talk) 19:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

I will explain: I saw the page history and noticed repeated unexplained removals of sourced claims with new unsourced info, so I restored it to the version before the problematic editing began. Please, if you want to make a change, support it with citations. It's not my job to do the fact checking for you, it's actually your job if you want to change/introduce new information, per WP:BURDEN. Sro23 (talk) 19:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

And you are who?

I think the user Chronus and the user DanielGSouza are the same guy, or they are working in meatpuppetry,Chronus send a message in Portuguese threatening me and saying "WE will work against you". "WE"?

I need to advice that this user Chronus is an dictator in the Portuguese Wiki (No exaggeration), he is known to all users of the Wiki-pt as rude and possessive, preventing all editing in articles where he touchs. Already quarreled with multiple users both Wiki-PT and even here, always wanting to impose his point of view. He is also known for extreme ideological bias (he is communist) and collusion with Wiki-PT administrators. You should kick this guy over here forever.Tamakukan (talk) 22:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Clearly you and Bazaira are the same person. I'm not going to waste my time responding to this. Sro23 (talk) 23:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

"I'm not going to waste my time responding to this," he says while wasting his time responding to it. Lol! Sro, you're so stupid. -YouKnowWho79 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.40.95 (talk) 23:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Says the person who wanted me to "fox" the List of Another World characters article. lol Sro23 (talk) 23:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Meh. Autocorrect, you know. At least my brain was on the right track. There's never any logic to anything you say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.40.95 (talk) 23:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits

Who was that person? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

It's User:Cebr1979, he thinks I don't contribute enough. I guess I'm supposed to leave the vandalism alone. Sro23 (talk) 00:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Do you want a semiprotect? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes please do so. Sro23 (talk) 00:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

I read what he wrote... it's delusional horseshit. Been here over ten years and I probably have less article creations than you. Early on, I came across a comment from someone high up in the WMF. He said if content creators all left, Wikipedia could go on for years. Information would gradually go out of date, but it'd still be there. If the vandal fighters all left, Wikipedia would be overrun in a few days by vandals, spammers, and trolls. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

I just blocked one of his commonly-used ranges. Hopefully, that will slow him down a tad. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:56, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

@NeilN: as well as Sro23, would you mind pinging me when you see Cebr pop up? Based on my looking around, his IP ranges generally have very little collateral damage and long-term blocks should be worthwhile. Looking at his ranges, a lot of vandalism is coming from them that hasn't necessarily been connected with him in the past. Knowing what IPs he uses and how often makes it easier to find and block ranges with little collateral damage to limit the vandalism. Thanks! ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

BU Rob13, maybe create a LTA page or subpage somewhere where we can list IPs? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@NeilN: It already exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Cebr1979. Feel free to create a subsection for specific blocked IPs/ranges on that page with dates of the blocks. I'll probably add the ones I've done recently to it later tonight (and create the section if someone hadn't already done so by then). ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

You think you've seen vandalism, Rob? I'll freaking show you vandalism if you start following me around! You're nothing compared to the others I've gone up against and I'm still here, boy. Piss me off. I dare you. I'll effing show you disruption. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.37.85 (talk) 05:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

It's the Sundance Kid-! _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Ok. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@BU Rob13: This is nothing urgent, but I thought I should let you know: Cebr1979 is still evading his block. He's being a little less obvious about it this time but I know it's him. Here are just a few IP's he's been using lately: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] Sro23 (talk) 03:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Sro23. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

@BU Rob13: Responded, sorry for taking so long. Also, could you block 207.102.57.250 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)? Static IP that Cebr keeps returning to. Sro23 (talk) 23:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Suamargad

actually the name of the fort is Sumargad and not Suamargad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccmarathe (talk • contribs) 15:06, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

If that's true, then you can request Suamargad be moved to Sumargad. Please don't do cut and paste moves, per WP:CUTPASTE. Sro23 (talk) 15:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your support

... on the "3 GB barrier" page. Jeh (talk) 02:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome, it's clear the IP has some crazy personal agenda against you. Sro23 (talk) 03:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Or against the person he thinks I am—somebody on some other forum. He also keeps quoting stuff that doesn't at all say what he thinks it says, thinking it supports his claims. But the final straw, his accusation that I hacked into an MSDN page to make it support my position, is just sad. Jeh (talk) 09:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the "oo" correction on carbon bubble. 69.58.42.90 (talk) 21:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome Sro23 (talk) 21:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Thoughts?

Do you have any idea who the IP vandal at Template:Fargo TV might be? TheREALCableGuy comes to mind, who recently had a ban appeal denied at AN because he was found to have been recently socking. It's certainly his topic area, but I don't know if any other sockmasters operate in this topic area. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

It's User:Hypocritepedia. Sro23 (talk) 22:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Was just on my way back over to tell you I had figured it out myself. Thanks for the help. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

J. Walter Thompson

I've added to the list of SPAs that have been active on this article. See the talk page. I didn't bother checking IPs. Meters (talk) 16:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

JWTWorlwide has been blocked now, so we have the option of starting an SPI later. Meters (talk) 17:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Wow, that's a lot of accounts. Maybe SPI would be appropriate in case there are more. Sro23 (talk) 17:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Spain national basketball team

I am guessing you are a fan of the Spain national basketball team :-). Sorry but according to Fiba.com, Diop is off the team. According to ESPN.com, Spain's ABC, and others, M. Gasol hasn't recovered from his injury and can't play. Don't worry, I think Spain can still be competitive against the US :-). Worldviews2016 (talk) 16:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Worldviews2016

I'm actually not really a fan, but I just noticed this edit instated some vandalism, but I can understand if it was unintentional. Sro23 (talk) 17:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

User talk page move protection

I've move protected your user talk page so only admins can move it. I can undo it or lower the protection to confirmed users if you want, but I don't really see why it's not the default (seeing how the only time we have to move it is when an admin renames an account). Ian.thomson (talk) 21:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for doing that Ian.thomson. The attacks on Sro23 are really out of line. S I would recommend leaving it. Today's move came by an editor who made just enough nonsense edits to become confirmed before messing with your page. I do admire you putting up with this so stoically. Many Many Many thanks for your work here at WikiP. MarnetteD|Talk 21:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Articles I created

I think vandal fighters and primarily content contributors are both needed. I'm more interested in reverting vandalism because I think I'm good at it and because I like maintaining quality. I don't believe this makes me less valuable of a user. Some people think I don't contribute enough, like this is some sort of contest to see who can contribute the most? Well here is proof this is false, so no more whining about how I don't create enough articles! In fact I've created/started several, mostly biographies of living people. Maybe they're not the best written, but that's still content from ME. Sro23 (talk) 17:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Honestly, article creation is becoming a less reasonable measure as time goes on. Ten years ago? Yeah, we needed articles. But outside of attempting to fix systemic bias, we're getting to a point where most new good-faith article attempts need to be wary of WP:NOTNEWS or WP:GNG; or else require doctorate-level research skills (and tools). We've also got a few users (no names) who act as though making articles when we barely had any to excuse their rather flagrant violations of WP:DICK.

If we're going to be the inclusive community we pretend to be, we do need to start emphasizing stuff like fighting vandalism, resolving disputes, gnome-ish edits, and so forth. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

The articles get more obscure, but we'll always need articles, if only because the newly notable people worldwide each year is a very large number. If y'all ever need articles to create, I have a literal encyclopedia of sports statistics from Canadian football where every single entry to notable as per WP:NGRIDIRON and there's enough information there to at least create a stub. I've gotten GA credits out of that book, though. Having said that, your work is obviously extraordinarily valuable to the project, Sro, and you shouldn't let the vandals who say otherwise get to you. I've known you for a couple weeks and you've already become my go-to when I need to identify a sock. The only reason you'd ever "need" to create substantial content would be to go for adminship, which I certainly hope you'll eventually do once you're ready. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 19:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your support, that's not something I can really see myself doing. I just want to say I really appreciate all the work you've already accomplished in the short time you've been admin. Sro23 (talk) 19:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Sock-puppet of JovanAndreano

Dear Sro23, I noticed that the user user:JovanAndreano, has returned making making all kinds of edits like 1, 2 and 3. He makes the same kind of edits like JovanAndreano and he removes or inserts information without explanation. The users are user:105.156.236.182, user:105.156.233.41. Just a few minutes the user user:196.206.65.201 reverted 30+ edits in less than 10 minutes. Thank you. Alhaqiha (talk) 19:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes the IPs certainly seem to be JovanAndreano. I'm not sure what else to do other than report them at the SPI or request pages be protected. I'm sorry this is happening. Sro23 (talk) 19:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks especially for catching that vandalism on my page! Cheers! Pax Verbum 03:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Eshumaitreyus

I notice that you added a 3RR warning to User talk:Eshumaitreyus. Just in case you didn't see it, because he removed it, I had already warned Eshumaitreyus about edit-warring.[8] He is skating on very thin ice. --AussieLegend (✉) 20:59, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

And then they made a bad faith vandalism report against me, not to mention that long incoherent rant they made on the talk page in addition to their overall combative attitude. Sro23 (talk) 21:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

There is something very fishing gone on here, re: User:Asukadamooka and User:Eshumaitreyus – if this keeps up, I'd suggest an SPI or contacting Bbb23 directly. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

And already done by NeilN: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eshumaitreyus. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

[9] _Muffled ^Pocketed 05:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

That hurt to read... Sro23 (talk) 11:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

My brain exploded before I got to the end. Well before. --AussieLegend (✉) 11:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

See NeilN's somewhat caustic response  ;) 11:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Homeboy accounts

I just checked on Meta and all of the Homeboy accounts have been globally locked so they can't be used, so no block is probably needed anymore. here. :) Feinoha ^Talk 22:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

NYC Police vandal

Do you know if this IP editor has had an account that he's currently blocked under? See here. Thanks! ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Not that I know of. Sro23 (talk) 11:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC) Actually, this account does appear to be related, but it is not blocked and has never even been warned. Sro23 (talk) 02:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

AN (about the Sipilä article)

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 19:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Seth MacFarlane awards

Why do you keep reverting edits on Seth MacFarlane awards page. The lead section is fine and explains the overall summary of the awards page. Every awards is listed in alphabetical order. The page is in its proper format. You keep reverting it back to where the page has issues. 107.77.230.94 (talk) 20:53, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Because you're a blocked disruptive sockpuppet that's why Sro23 (talk) 02:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quarterback

Punted this one to RPP. I'm hoping the admin will jsut block all the IPs as obvious socks to avoid a messy SPI. Meters (talk) 20:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Reply

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Foleo (talk) 02:33, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

I've blocked Foleo for 72 hours. It's rather rich they're plastering warnings all over the place without taking part in the talk page discussion. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:40, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

BANREVERT

Regarding your comment/question here, I recommend letting the revert stand as an "object lesson". We need to be creative in trying to redirect this vandal. - Brianhe (talk) 04:32, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Why did you remove section from Plastic Welding Page?

Why did you remove section from Plastic Welding Page? What makes you an expert on this?

I will report both you and Mean as custard to wikapedia for trying to monopolize the page. There are links to websites on this page and we are manufacturers of Laser Welding machines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmitryp123 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Italian

It is the closest language to Latin. Few months ago an IP changed it and nobody spoke.--93.36.3.110 (talk) 18:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

You mean this? Why is it unreliable? Sro23 (talk) 18:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Castle of Óbidos

Hi How was it a cut and paste move? Pyrusca (talk) 19:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Castle of Óbidos is a duplicate of the older article, Castelo de Óbidos. I'm not sure how this mix up happened, but for now I've redirected the newer article to the older one so that there are not two articles about the same subject. Sro23 (talk) 19:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

• I don't actually understand the intent of the page move to the Portuguese naming convention? Age of the article should not mean anything in this case. The older article should have been moved to "Castle of Óbidos", just like the recent move to "Castelo de Mértola" from "Castle of Mertola". The English convention should predominate in this case, as there are sources that refer to the English naming convention. Please revert Castle of Óbidos as the valid article, there is no justification for reverting the name to the Portuguese.^{ruben jc} ZEORYMER (talk) 20:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm just discovering this now, apparently a user created a bunch of duplicate Portuguese Castle articles instead of simply expanding on the existing articles and moving the pages to the English title (Castle of Mertola is a duplicate of Castelo de Mértola, Castle of Belmonte is duplicate of Castelo de Belmonte, there's more...I have undone my changes but right now I'm SO confused, it feels wrong. Sro23 (talk) 20:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Yup, I discovered that ages ago...and have been slowly expanding articles, then moving them to their acceptable English naming convention. A recent user, who may have perpetuated these errors was later determined to be a sockpuppeteer and suspended accordingly. Regardless, I appreciate you reverting the article redirects. I will try to cleanup the content accordingly, after my zip through "Lighthouses of Portugal". Cheers. ^{ruben jc} ZEORYMER (talk) 16:24, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Gumtala

Please do not continue editwarring at Gumtala. It would be best to familiarise yourself with the WP:3RR (three revert rule), because violation of this policy could lead to a block. What you are removing is not vandalism. Creektiming (talk) 18:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

I know about the rule. The content I'm removing is an unsourced statement that is repeatedly being reinserted by a blocked user (User:Cebr1979), which exempts me from 3rr. Sro23 (talk) 18:38, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

@Sro23. If we are dealing with a banned user then that puts a different light on things. Your best bet is to open a SPI with links to the accounts being suspected. Without this, you, I, and all others are obliged to follow the general rules. Creektiming (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

My article of Faris Al-Rawi

Why did you undo my revision. If you had checked ALL my sources and not simply assume it was unreliable you would have realized that my information is actually RELIABLE! Pnmforlife (talk) 23:28, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

FYI

FYI, I reported Colinmiller13 to AIV a bit ago. User was blocked recently for the same behavior. EvergreenFir (talk) 01:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I think it's worrying how all the user's edits appear to be unexplained date changes. Sro23 (talk) 02:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, there

Hi, Could you please stop editing my article? The article you are talking about is a stub, I have added more info to my article. If you want you can export the missing info to make and complete one single article. I would appreciate your respect to my research. Syntaktis (talk) 21:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

@Syntaktis: Please see WP:OWN. You do not own the article, and since the article already exists on Wikipedia, a new article doesn't belong. Instead, introduce your edits at Rodrigo Semprun. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

@BU Rob13: Hi, I KNOW I don't own the article, with the term "my article" I meant that I wrote the article that Sro23 was redericting to a "shorter one" (stub) and well it's ok, I will export the missing info. Thanks guys. Syntaktis (talk) 22:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Please Sro23

Sro23 please stop making a personal attack and accusation at me, yes my actions were Homechallenge were not the correct way to make a compromise and that's on me, but all I was doing was making changes on the Michelle Ruff page.--AnimeDisneylover95 (talk) 04:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank You for Editing the List of Columbia Pictures Page

Thank You for Editing the List of Columbia Pictures Page, can you also add the movies "The King's Crown", "Romeo and Juliet", and "The Culver City Story" on the List of TriStar Pictures Page. Arik069 (talk) 3:47 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Porn vandal

Please ping me when you find them again; I'm adding the images to the bad images list and blocking quickly. Investigating potential range blocks. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Okay. Sro23 (talk) 03:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

He's range blocked for a week and I think I revision deleted everything objectionable. If they pop up, let me know, but they should be gone for now. Thanks for your help in reverting them. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Battle of Sirte

I moved it per Wikipedia common name, since there was already a disambiguation page with the correct name, the standard move page procedure cannot be used.XavierGreen (talk) 15:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry but cut and paste moves are not allowed. You can however request a move at WP:RM. Sro23 (talk) 15:58, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Whisper2Me

Hi!

"Whisper2Me" is not me. (pun not intended) WhisperToMe (talk) 16:28, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Impersonator then? I guess it could be a coincidence, but I do think the name is too similar. Sro23 (talk) 16:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

See what the further edits are like. It may be a total coincidence. Only if say the person is trying to actually impersonate me would I take action. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Sock puppet

Good call identifying Electivo000 as a sockpuppet. He clearly fits the pattern. —C.Fred (talk) 03:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Actually, it was Fountains of Bryn Mawr who first made the connection. I simply saw the sockpuppet investigation page. Sro23 (talk) 11:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Untitled

Thank you for your work. How long will it take for Wikipedia to remove that page about me (Constantia Oomen)? I would prefer for it to be gone soon, as it has spread over the internet without ever being updated and it's so old. If I would write books about these subjects again, they would be different. Now this article about me appears on many other pages with photos of mine that are taken from my website without permission, like "america.pink". I have written them numerous times: no reply. Very rude. Hope by removal of this Wikipedia page, I will be "less interesting" to copy.

Best regards, ThroughTheWindow (talk) 03:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Constantia Oomen

At this point the article will surely be deleted, but I honestly have no idea how long it will take for the discussion to close. Probably not too long. Sro23 (talk) 11:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Apparently not; Just closed as No consensus. _Muffled ^Pocketed 12:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Actually, there's a second nomination currently open. Sro23 (talk) 12:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

@Sro23: Cheers! -I must've been on drugs :o -saying had 'just' been closed when actually it was four years ago! D'OH. _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Sirte edit warring

First, this is Wikipedia policy on Common names (common name is Battle of Sirte). Second, the ORIGINAL article name was Battle of Sirte (2016) and THAT move to offensive was undiscused (contrary to Wiki policy) without a move request. So both me and Xavier are canceling an editor's unilateral move to offensive who did not make a move request (that you are talking about constantly). Third, you just made four reverts (more than 3) in less than 24 hours on a single article page violating Wikipedia's rule on WP:3RR which can get you blocked. If you do not cancel your last edit I will have to report you. EkoGraf (talk) 15:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Please read WP:CUTPASTE. You weren't cancelling any move, you were doing a cut-and-paste move. Under no circumstances are these moves allowed, because they split the page history, which is required for attribution and copyright reasons. Since more than one person has become upset by this, I have requested a move at WP:RMT. Sro23 (talk) 16:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

For the third time, the original article's name WAS Battle of Sirte which was changed without a move request a few weeks ago by another editor. XavierGreen's first edit was not a copy-paste but an appropriate redirect which you reverted. And again, you violated 3RR by making 4 reverts (1 more than is allowed per WP policy) and per Wikipedia's policy an administrator can very easily decide to block you because of this. You are obligated to discuss the issues at the talk pages instead of engage in edit warring. EkoGraf (talk) 16:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

The pages history here and here prove that it was a cut and paste move. I ask for your patience, as I have requested an uncontroversial move here:[10], so it shouldn't take too long for the article to be moved to the proper title. Sro23 (talk) 16:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Sro23 is right, the page needs to be moved properly. An admin can revert the undiscussed move, but copy-pasting the content is not sufficient. clpo13_(talk) 16:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Anyway, I said what I had. Battle of Sirte (2016) was the original article name and its move to offensive (a few weeks ago) was undiscussed. Xavier's first edit was a proper redirect (not a copy-paste) and you canceled it. And again, 3RR is something that shouldn't be taken lightly. EkoGraf (talk) 16:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Do you mean this? No, that's still a cut and paste move.

I truly believed that undoing cut and paste moves exempted me from 3rr (#5), but if this is false, my sincerest apologies for the disruption. I promise it won't happen again. I will try not to edit war, but please, I also encourage you to respect policy on cut and paste moves: instead you need to request moves when undiscussed complicated page moves are made that can't be undone by regular users. Sro23 (talk) 17:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

IPS

Hi!I went to the IPS investigation of JovanAndreano, but I saw that the investigation was closed.Alhaqiha (talk) 18:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

If you want to open a sockpuppet investigation, you can use Wikipedia:Twinkle, or go to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, where it says "How to open an investigation", enter JovanAndreano's name, hit submit and then follow the instructions from there. Sro23 (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Syntaktis

*Sigh*... They're still removing the protection & deletion templates from the page. Also just a heads up, they reported you at WP:AIV... :-/ ElysianTail (talk) 18:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I saw that. I've been reported there in bad faith before and nothing happened, I'm not too worried. Sro23 (talk) 18:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm sure, just didn't know if you saw it or not... Cheers! ElysianTail (talk) 18:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

The AIV reports (both) were removed and the page was deleted by two admins. Tony Tan · talk 18:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Typo fix on a talk page

Hello, i want to understand there were typo on blocked message added by other user. I know i should not edit other's talk message. But in the message, it says "indefinete" rather than "Indefinite, so i corrected the typo. Does the policy against editing others talk message also apply to this reason? Stylez995 (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

WP:TPO states "It is not necessary to bring talk pages to publishing standards, so there is no need to correct typing/spelling errors, grammar, etc. It may irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. The basic rule—with some specific exceptions outlined below—is that you should not edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission." Sro23 (talk) 14:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

OK, thank you. I should remember that. :) Stylez995 (talk) 14:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Sro23

So you are a Germany hating person ? But all that edits are still correct and true, which i do. Ma34rsta (talk) 18:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

GAB^gab 21:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

A good laugh

I can't get enough of this guy! GAB^gab 20:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

I didn't even get to this one in time, but he still remembered me. Bless. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

About SPI edit

Thanks for telling me. I won't tag the trolls as you told me. This should keep those clowns away. ThunderFan109 ^{(Thunder Up!)} 21:36, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Whack-a-Mole Winner

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For sharp-eyed vandal reversion in music articles, especially the very annoying hoaxer known as the Kenny Loggins vandal. Many thanks! Binksternet (talk) 23:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Maile Flanagan

Excuse me, but why would you revert and remove my edit 11 days later if both Astro Boy and Naruto are Anime hence the reason as to why English version was put in?--AnimeDisneylover95 (talk) 01:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Because it is already implied every role is in English, as with other articles. Sro23 (talk) 02:04, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Yeah but some actors (mainly celebrities) and certain voice actors (mainly the ones that do Pre-lay animation like Tara Strong, Jim Cummings, etc..) don't often appear in anime voice over work, and Maile is one of them.--AnimeDisneylover95 (talk) 16:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Incorrigible Troll's SPI

You really need to see the new sock's username. Ayub407^talk 06:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Begusarai Edits

Hi Sro23,

The page that has been put up is up to date with all the latest facts. It is not an old page. A lot of the stuff used in the page is pure hard facts which have come from the old page. There are many differences. If you have any problems with the facts please let us know. Just reverting arbitrarily does not make sense. I assert again that the page you see is an updated version and not an old page. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yeasayer (talk • contribs) 14:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

No, with this edit (I assume it was you) you reverted back to a May 2016 version of the article. You need to clearly explain what exactly is incorrect about the newer version so we can fix it instead of reverting to an older version. Please stop edit warring, you don't WP:OWN the article, others are free to edit it. Sro23 (talk) 14:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Sro23, I have not reverted to that page. Please notice that everything now reads 'was' instead of is. The ending date of the show has been put in and so has the Ending sequence of the show. The page looks similar because I have picked up passages from the old page. Please also notice that the name of the company Saregama productions which was the original contract holder from &TV for this production has been added. Trust me brother, I am just trying to present the facts without any Ego. The only difference between us is that I was actually involved with the show and know everything about. NOT trying to be smart or offensive please, in case it comes off as that I am deeply apologetic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yeasayer (talk • contribs) 14:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

This page is about trusted web. It is not a spam or promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by E.Macro (talk • contribs) 16:28, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Concerning the Latest Vandal on "The Good Dinosaur"

Given the vandal's insistence on mentioning me, it sounds like a sockpuppet of Dinosaurpainting (talk · contribs), a sockpuppeteer who makes a habit of giving me grief when it remembers to do so.--Mr Fink (talk) 04:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

why are you reporting me as a :Sockpuppet whan I am not?

why?

--Iniced (talk) 13:02, 7 August 2016 (UTC)