Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Petersen (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:40, 8 August 2016

Austin Petersen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nom does not believe page should be deleted. This is a procedural RfD to resolve repeated redirects. LavaBaron (talk) 20:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (Oppose Deletion, Merge, or Redirect) Meets our GNG. Austin Petersen has been the subject of focused biographical profile stories - dated before and after his failed candidacy - in the Kansas City Star, National Review, Reason Magazine, and KYW-TV. He has been mentioned as part of round-up stories by CNBC, the Los Angeles Times, CNN, Washington Times, and Washington Post. Previous issues with this article which resulted in its justifiable deletion - namely, it was sourced to a combination of YouTube videos and Libertarian fan blogs - have now been resolved. LavaBaron (talk) 20:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of the information mentioned in the above comment is repeated stories already in the numerous deleted variations of the Austin Petersen article attempts. Since the end of the party convention Petersen has not been news-worthy. Bunco man (talk) 20:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Libertarian Party presidential primaries, 2016 as per previous nom. The articles cited don't add up enough to meet the "significant press coverage" requirement of WP:NPOL IMO. - SanAnMan (talk) 21:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, you're mistaken. Biographical profile stories (not just incidental mentions), published in Kansas City Star, National Review, Reason Magazine, and KYW-TV substantially overcomes the 'significant press coverage' requirement of WP:NOL. This is established through wide precedent of other minor party candidates, see: Darrell Castle, Evan McMullin, Rocky De La Fuente, Ken Fields, etc. etc. WP:IDONTLIKEIT by Libertarian Party fanboys is not a reason to delete. LavaBaron (talk) 21:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. ^Falling_Gravity 21:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per LavaBaron. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 :({{Find sources AFD|Austin Petersen}})
 Nom does not believe page should be deleted. This is a procedural RfD to resolve repeated redirects. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 20:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
-* '''Oppose Deletion, Merge, or Redirect''' Meets our GNG. Austin Petersen has been the subject of focused biographical profile stories - dated before and after his failed candidacy - in the ''[[Kansas City Star]]'', ''[[National Review]]'', ''[[Reason (magazine)|Reason Magazine]]'', and [[KYW-TV]]. He has been mentioned as part of round-up stories by [[CNBC]], the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', [[CNN]], ''[[Washington Times]]'', and ''[[Washington Post]]''. Previous issues with this article which resulted in its justifiable deletion - namely, it was sourced to a combination of YouTube videos and Libertarian fan blogs - have now been resolved. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 20:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
+* '''Keep (Oppose Deletion, Merge, or Redirect)''' Meets our GNG. Austin Petersen has been the subject of focused biographical profile stories - dated before and after his failed candidacy - in the ''[[Kansas City Star]]'', ''[[National Review]]'', ''[[Reason (magazine)|Reason Magazine]]'', and [[KYW-TV]]. He has been mentioned as part of round-up stories by [[CNBC]], the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', [[CNN]], ''[[Washington Times]]'', and ''[[Washington Post]]''. Previous issues with this article which resulted in its justifiable deletion - namely, it was sourced to a combination of YouTube videos and Libertarian fan blogs - have now been resolved. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 20:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * '''Delete''' Most of the information mentioned in the above comment is repeated stories already in the numerous deleted variations of the Austin Petersen article attempts. Since the end of the party convention Petersen has not been news-worthy. [[User:Bunco man|Bunco man]] ([[User talk:Bunco man|talk]]) 20:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 *<small>'''Automated comment:''' This AfD was not correctly [[WP:TRANSCLUDE|transcluded]] to the log ([[WP:AFDHOWTO|step 3]]).  I have transcluded it to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 8]].  —[[User:Cyberbot I|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot I</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot I|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 20:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)</small><!--Cyberbot I relist-->