User talk:Aust331: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 08:21, 10 August 2016

Template:Useronline

Welcome to my talk page!

Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing!

Also take care of the following points:

If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page.
Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":"
Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room.
Please, always assume good faith.
If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page.
And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving WikiLove.

⇒Start a new topic⇐

Review Earth April

Hi, thanks for your editing for Earth April, it was tagged for speedy deletion, I responded in the talk page can you have a look and remove the tag? Fn2gf3431 (talk) 03:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fn2gf3431, as it stands, the article seems to require stronger 3rd-party sources. I cannot remove the tag without this first. Aust331 (talk) 08:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but it already has it, the positive review from international leading scientist bekoff for the project of earth april https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animal-emotions/201204/the-superior-human-who-do-we-think-we-are Fn2gf3431 (talk) 08:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It needs more than a single review. Aust331 (talk) 08:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added more sources,can you have a look? Or you can just google 'The Superior Human?'. Fn2gf3431 (talk) 09:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The organization's most 'notable' accomplishment, The Superior Human? (Documentary), is currently undergoing an AfD discussion. Part of the problem is that both articles (the organization's and the documentary's) describe the documentary as having received "hundreds" of positive reviews, but this is not the case (it may have received positive reviews from the general public and small organizations, but only a few from notable, independent, and trusted sources). I've googled the film and it has indeed received some feedback (although the youtube link's voting has been turned off), but at this point it seems this issue will be resolved via the AfD discussion. I would suggest you contest the Speedy deletion on the article's talk page, outlining this and any other detailed reason why you don't think the article should be deleted. Aust331 (talk) 09:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are hundreds positive reviews on Youtube comment section alone. The Superior Human? has been there for 2 years, you can check the history. What is your opinion of the deletion? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Superior_Human%3F Fn2gf3431 (talk) 10:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is my point, "hundreds of positive reviews on Youtube" does not qualify the article as notable. Aust331 (talk) 10:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about others aspects? involving many world leading academics?Fn2gf3431 (talk) 11:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But there aren't many. Aust331 (talk) 11:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Richard D. Ryder, Steven Best, Bernard Rollin and Marc Bekoff at lest. Please look into their wikipedia pages Fn2gf3431 (talk) 11:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Songlines (magazine), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Allen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monumental Pictures

The organization is opening a new film in September at festivals across the world. I'm more than sure that adequate publicity and coverage of it including published articles will emerge when this happens. I'll be more than happy to provide them to the page when that happens. Is there anything I can do in the meantime? I found some podcasts and blogposts that might be of interest. I have followed this organization for a very long time. They are legitimately popular and sell out theaters that I have been to first hand. The farthest back I can find the official website according to it's registrar and the internet archive is 2001. I don't know if this means anything to it's credibility?Contentcreatordata (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alexia Thomas

Nice catch. I have deleted the article as re-creation of a deleted article, self-promotion, and general crackpottery. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for helping Wikipedia. PUFFAR (talk) 08:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My Page

Please do not erase my page. I have worked hard on it and it has much importance. Page: PUFFAR — Preceding unsigned comment added by PUFFAR (talk • contribs) 08:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not want the page to be deleted, then you need to establish why it should be kept and provide evidence of notability. As it stands, the page does not meet Wikipedia's standards. Aust331 (talk) 08:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 08:15, 10 August 2016 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,554,948 edits m Signing comment by PUFFAR - "→My Page: new section" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:21, 10 August 2016 edit undo Aust331 (talk \| contribs) 373 edits →My Page Next edit →
Line 50:		Line 50:

	Please do not erase my page. I have worked hard on it and it has much importance. Page: PUFFAR <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:PUFFAR\|PUFFAR]] ([[User talk:PUFFAR\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PUFFAR\|contribs]]) 08:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		Please do not erase my page. I have worked hard on it and it has much importance. Page: PUFFAR <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:PUFFAR\|PUFFAR]] ([[User talk:PUFFAR\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/PUFFAR\|contribs]]) 08:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			:If you do not want the page to be deleted, then you need to establish why it should be kept and provide evidence of notability. As it stands, the page does not meet Wikipedia's standards. [[User:Aust331\|Aust331]] ([[User talk:Aust331#top\|talk]]) 08:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)