Talk:Murder of Seth Rich: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Merge: Reply |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:You just deleted the stuff about the links to the email leak and now you want to merge it to that article? How does that work? [[User:TradingJihadist|TradingJihadist]] ([[User talk:TradingJihadist|talk]]) 00:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC) |
:You just deleted the stuff about the links to the email leak and now you want to merge it to that article? How does that work? [[User:TradingJihadist|TradingJihadist]] ([[User talk:TradingJihadist|talk]]) 00:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC) |
||
::See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Recently_dead_or_probably_dead]. You can't put speculation and conspiracy theories into an article about a recently deceased person, especially based on junk sources like the Daily Mail.[[User:Volunteer Marek|Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 00:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC) |
::See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Recently_dead_or_probably_dead]. You can't put speculation and conspiracy theories into an article about a recently deceased person, especially based on junk sources like the Daily Mail.[[User:Volunteer Marek|Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 00:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC) |
||
:::You are making false claims even after having this pointed out to you. Nowhere is the Daily Mail being used to support conspiracy theories. The content you are deleting is well sourced, and you can't give a reason to delete the content. [[User:TradingJihadist|TradingJihadist]] ([[User talk:TradingJihadist|talk]]) 00:43, 11 August 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:43, 11 August 2016
Merge
This should be merged to 2016 Democratic National Committee email leakVolunteer Marek (talk) 00:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- You just deleted the stuff about the links to the email leak and now you want to merge it to that article? How does that work? TradingJihadist (talk) 00:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- See [1]. You can't put speculation and conspiracy theories into an article about a recently deceased person, especially based on junk sources like the Daily Mail.Volunteer Marek (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- You are making false claims even after having this pointed out to you. Nowhere is the Daily Mail being used to support conspiracy theories. The content you are deleting is well sourced, and you can't give a reason to delete the content. TradingJihadist (talk) 00:43, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- See [1]. You can't put speculation and conspiracy theories into an article about a recently deceased person, especially based on junk sources like the Daily Mail.Volunteer Marek (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)