Jump to content

Optional preferential voting: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
complete numbering is not required under the OPV system (effectively a full-preference vote), single-preference voters are supposed to use a '1' rather than a tick or cross. In practice, ticks or crosses are still considered valid votes as the intention is clear.
complete numbering is not required under the OPV system (effectively a full-preference vote), single-preference voters are supposed to use a '1' rather than a tick or cross. In practice, ticks or crosses are still considered valid votes as the intention is clear.


OPV is used in [[New South Wales]] and [[Northern Territory]] elections in the [[Commonwealth of Australia]].<ref>[http://www.elections.nsw.gov.au/about_elections/voting_and_counting_systems/optional_preferential Optional Preferential: Elections NSW]</ref><ref>[http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2016/02/northern-territory-adopts-optional-preferential-voting-and-bans-campaigning-near-polling-places.html Northern Territory Adopts Optional Preferential Voting and Bans Campaigning Near Polling Places: Antony Green ABC 11 February 2016]</ref> All other Australian lower house elections are run under [[full-preferential voting]], where all of the candidates must be ranked in order of the preference of the voter to be counted.
OPV is used in [[New South Wales]] and [[Northern Territory]] elections in the [[Commonwealth of Australia]].<ref>[http://www.elections.nsw.gov.au/about_elections/voting_and_counting_systems/optional_preferential Optional Preferential: Elections NSW]</ref><ref>[http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2016/02/northern-territory-adopts-optional-preferential-voting-and-bans-campaigning-near-polling-places.html Northern Territory Adopts Optional Preferential Voting and Bans Campaigning Near Polling Places: Antony Green ABC 11 February 2016]</ref>


In the [[Victorian Legislative Council]] ''semi-optional'' voting is used with a minimum number of preferences required if a voter chooses to vote [[Above-the-line voting|below the line]].
In both the [[Tasmanian House of Assembly]] and the [[Tasmanian Legislative Council]], ''semi-optional'' voting is used - a minimum number of preferences must be expressed, but there is no requirement to complete the entire ballot paper. All other Australian lower house elections are run under [[full-preferential voting]], where all of the candidates must be ranked in order of the preference of the voter to be counted.

In the [[Victorian Legislative Council]], semi-optional voting is used if a voter chooses to vote [[Above-the-line voting|below the line]].


In 2016, Senate Voting Reform in Australia switched the [[Australian Senate|Senate]] ballot papers from full-preference voting to semi-optional. A minimum number is specified in the instructions on the ballot paper. Since in the past a single single number '1' [[Above-the-line voting|above the line]] was formal, that is still a valid vote even though voters are encouraged to number six squares.
In 2016, Senate Voting Reform in Australia switched the [[Australian Senate|Senate]] ballot papers from full-preference voting to semi-optional. A minimum number is specified in the instructions on the ballot paper. Since in the past a single single number '1' [[Above-the-line voting|above the line]] was formal, that is still a valid vote even though voters are encouraged to number six squares.

Revision as of 21:05, 17 August 2016

Optional Preferential Voting (OPV) is a system of vote-casting.

Under OPV, voters may choose to mark a preference for one candidate (effectively voting as though it were a first-past-the-post election), all candidates or any number of candidates in between. Although complete numbering is not required under the OPV system (effectively a full-preference vote), single-preference voters are supposed to use a '1' rather than a tick or cross. In practice, ticks or crosses are still considered valid votes as the intention is clear.

OPV is used in New South Wales and Northern Territory elections in the Commonwealth of Australia.[1][2]

In both the Tasmanian House of Assembly and the Tasmanian Legislative Council, semi-optional voting is used - a minimum number of preferences must be expressed, but there is no requirement to complete the entire ballot paper. All other Australian lower house elections are run under full-preferential voting, where all of the candidates must be ranked in order of the preference of the voter to be counted.

In the Victorian Legislative Council, semi-optional voting is used if a voter chooses to vote below the line.

In 2016, Senate Voting Reform in Australia switched the Senate ballot papers from full-preference voting to semi-optional. A minimum number is specified in the instructions on the ballot paper. Since in the past a single single number '1' above the line was formal, that is still a valid vote even though voters are encouraged to number six squares.

In other countries, such as Malta, Ireland, and Northern Ireland, full preferences are not required.

References