User talk:GungyRedBrick: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:49, 22 August 2016

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I've written the article. It's been edited over and over again and it looks great IMO. How do I have it published? When we search for it, it is not showing up. It's only showing up in our contributions category but nowhere else? It says User:Nonnahs SMS/Moses Sanchez at the top but we can't search Moses Sanchez and it pop up? Are we missing something? Thanks

Nonnahs SMS (talk) 18:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted your article for review. Within the next few weeks, another editor will review your draft and determine if it is ready for publication. Between now and then, you are welcome to continue editing the draft. , it will be moved to the mainspace and be searchable normally. As the draft is in the userspace, it can't be searched for without the User: prefix.

On another note, you keep using the pronoun "We." I have to ask, is there more than one person using this account? -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 18:27, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moses Sanchez (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See political notability guidelines and general notability guidelines. This individual does not appear to be notable. Also, this draft contains peacock language praising the subject and his family.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moses Sanchez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:55, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nonnahs SMS, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:55, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moses Sanchez (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would not resubmit because there's still nothing actually convincing for his own independent notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moses Sanchez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 |}<!-- Template:Teahouse_invitation -->
 {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{ns:3}}|[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]}}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
+== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Moses Sanchez|Moses Sanchez]] (August 22) ==
+<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
+{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage about the subject in [[WP:RS|''reliable'' sources]] that are ''independent'' of the subject—see the [[WP:BIO|guidelines on the notability of people]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.|}}&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:
+{{divbox|blue|3=I would not resubmit because there's still nothing actually convincing for his own independent notability.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.  You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
+{{clear}}
+* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Moses Sanchez]] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
+* If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Moses_Sanchez '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span> or on the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Moses_Sanchez '''reviewer's talk page''']</span>.
+* You can also use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors]].
+[[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 06:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->